The deletion of my further flattening efforts after this post has been a gross miscarriage of justice. THEY ARE STILL THE ORIGINAL SOYJAK IMAGE, AND RECOGNIZABLE AS SUCH. THEY ARE MERELY DISTORTED, IN A WAY THAT MANY OTHER SOYJAK EDITS HAVE BEEN DISTORTED BEFORE, AND NOT REMOVED. I DEMAND A RETRIAL.

IAS

@Sgt_Blueheart: dap just delete this raisin

When determining if something is a soyjak, think the following: Would a reasonable person (possibly one that might be considered a normie) say the image you are planning on uploading is a soyjak?

Low effort soyjak posts may be rejected at the approver's discretion.

@Chud: You have no rebuttal. I'm right.

@Chud: i'll let this one stay. you can still tell this is soyak by looking at it

@dap: This was high effort. Also, if we are going by what a "normie" would consider to be a soyjak, then 80% of the posts on this site labeled IAS would not be IAS. In any case, a normal person upon cursory inspection would see it is a flattened soyjak image.

@dap: You could tell the other ones were soyjak by looking at it too. Your judgement is flawed, or you are an abnormally imperceptive person.

made me brap

@Sgt_Blueheart: you're not funny nor clever. go make some real oc instead of flattening soyjaks until they resemble a bunch of noon lines

@dap: I'm not trying to be funny. I'm completely serious, and I'll be taking this up with your higher ups.

@dap: also "a bunch of noon lines" isn't this what any fucking drawing of a soyjak is? Your logic doesn't make any sense. The soyjak wasn't flattened enough to be unrecognizable, and it wasn't flattened enough for the lines to merge into one. It was still very much readily identifiable as a soyjak.

soyjacque social experiment

@MoistPepper: it is called soy woah jacque you bigot

@Sgt_Blueheart: your post is still in the deletion queue and is awaiting to get either completely deleted or restored. what will happen from now on is up to admins

If you zoom in to one of the flattened soyjaks, you will see immediately that they are a soyjak. The eyes, nose, mouth and teeth are all readily discernible. All it takes is zooming in. That isn't hard. Any normie could do it. If your complaint is that you can't tell from a distance; you can't tell that soybooru post number 165215 has soyjaks without zooming in because the image is so large. Does that make that NAS? This image is also very large.

@Sgt_Blueheart: its brimstone

@dap: And the admins will prove me right.

@Zonky: >calling soyak brimstone
Go back

@dap: i have made myself clear - the version of the flattened soyak i deleted was way too distorted to even resemble a soyjak

@dap: You have made yourself clear, and you are completely wrong. You still haven't addressed a single one of my points. The version of the flattened soyjak you deleted still contained all the components to resemble a soyjak, which were readily recognizable.

@Sgt_Blueheart: all of those components don't really matter if they are unidentifiable by the naked eye

@dap: They are identifiable to the naked eye. All it takes is zooming in, which as I have mentioned is the same amount of effort needed to discern whether a large crowd soyjak drawing like post number 165215 is IAS.

@MissCircleLargeBreast: we call this a uollac in Puerto Rico

ferrets be having philosophical debates on what is IAS or not

@MoistPepper: It IS that deep btw.