05/02/25 - NAS is now selectively allowed on the soybooru. See https://wiki.soyjak.st/SoyBooru_guide and https://booru.soyjak.st/post/view/116224 for details.
05/02/25 - Uploads with fewer than 5 (five) tags and a variant tag will be denied
04/28/25 - There's a new sheriff in town. Send all concerns, complaints, and suggestions to soysneed@soyjak.st
IP 18.222.166.40 has been banned until the end of time because of VPN Detected
If you couldn't possibly be guilty of what you're banned for, the person we banned probably had a dynamic IP address and so do you.
OF FUCKING COURSE THE SHIT@LIAN DIASPORA RAT CANT SEE THAT THIS POST LITERALLY PROVES THAT XHES A FUCKING SHTSKN NIGGER WHOS 40% MIDDLE EASTERN RAT SUBHUMAN SO XHE HATES ANGLO AMERICAN ARYAN GERMANICS
Chud70: @Albert: ^nigger the trvke literally proves you are brown
Albert is a fart skinned southern shtalalalaian who is 40% middle eastern and genetically closer to lebanese monkeys
Albert: @Chud: shartskin stereotype doe we're literally all Caucasians, touristnigs like you always go to south italaryania too instead, sorry mutt but secularfags lost
Sectionalism: Formal software models southerners as having MENA DNA, but it is not Levantine. It is from Iron Age Anatolia. This is also the source of eastern DNA in imperial Rome and Greek.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq0755
https://shorturl.at/hinBP
(I had to shorten url because it had banned word in it)
Levant Neolithic/PPNB has a lot of Anatolia Neolithic as well. Use Natufian in deep models.
Sectionalism: G25 has always given all sorts of models for med populations, I don’t know why. I’ve found good distances on models which preferred German to IA Ital, Mycenaean, AND IA Sicili for SItals, Jews, what have you. And yes, Sicili IA is very genetically different already from mainland Ital and has more CHG than Mycenaeans. But probably less than modern SItals.
I’m not glazing SItals, I’m not dickriding Sicils. They are undoubtedly the problem child of It’y and have IQ which is low for European standards, although this is probably mostly due to brain drain. Same reason Scotland has a significantly lower IQ than England, except it’s worse in It’y. Do I think also, they are mixed with unpleasant components? Yes. I mean, central and north It’ls have a bit too. Aosta valley is basically French so it’s sort of a bad example. But do I think it is significant enough to call them a different race from other Europeans? No. Especially since, unlike, say, Ashkenazi Jews or Maltese, it is not really from a more Natufian-rich source like the levant or Arabia. Instead it’s from CHG/ANF which is already in Europe to some degree through farmers and steppe.
Sectionalism: @Chud: yes, when I worked at a place which made ice cream and cheeseburgers I liked their mint chocolate chip a lot. It’s a good ice cream flavor. And I like thin mints. Goyslop eaters say it tastes like toothpaste which is dumb. It’s supposed to be refreshment, and medicinal. They served ice cream at pharmacies in the old days cuz it was medicinal and mint chocolate chip is more like herbal. Yeah.
Chud81: @Sectionalism: lots of people I know say it's weird to eat mint chocolate. Except my Grandma, she loves those After Eight Classic mints. She is awesome, and has patrician taste in sweets. I'm glad to know you like it as well.
Chud83: @Chud: I shall lead the Itaryan-American people to glory and conquer the south as the Normans did to England and brung the Anglo-Saxon people their glory and establish caste system… with Ital-Amerikkkans at the top… yes… and the world shall hate me for it…
Chud85: @Sectionalism: S.cil eastern shift is unattributable purely to chg/anf as evidenced by shift toward levant relative to IA S.itl samples on the PCAs (despite coinciding influx of steppe-rich N euro migrants), despite issues w/ G25, you acknowledged it as useful for admixture modelling in your response to the shtaly map & many of the S.itl samples from eurogenes can be modeled as having Levant_N input aside from their elevated anf/chg. non steppe mediated chg can't really be classed as white either but that's obvious
Sectionalism: @Chud: I don’t think it is purely attributable to CHG/ANF, but the Levantine component is in the minority. On the model I use S.Itals get 5-10% Natufian. Significant, yes, but far below what you see among Jews, Cypriots, MENA people, and southern Caucasus people. For comparison, that’s around the amount of East Asian you see in Finns and North Russians.
CHG not mediated through steppe is not a “white” component, but its much more white adjacent than Iran Neo and Levantine. Because CHG is not nearly as basal-rich as ANE/IranN and Iran Neo might also have some other weird stuff in it. Like I’ve seen some people into the deep ancestry stuff say it has Tianyuan admixture. CHG might be closer to Europeans than non-caucasian middle easterners, I’ve seen mixed stuff on it. Caucasus people obviously have the most
Chud90: Aryanbert is a fair skinned northern itarararararyan who is 100% Gallo-Roman and genetically identical to the ancient Warrior Bunds of the Appennini
Chud91: @Sectionalism: Even though CHG is a more euro-adjacent west asian component, surely the same can be applied in the inverse to ANF? it's been in europe for far less than WHG/EHG has, consequently far less divergent from non-european caucasoids (and as such it detracts from the validity of "white" as a taxonomic category) sicils might have the "whitest non white" input but they likewise have the brownest admixture that can still be plausibly considered "white". but that's just CHG anyway, they still score plenty Natufian & Iran_N ofc
Chud93: @Sectionalism: Quick deep ancestry run no ppnb and average of CHG/Iran_N/Natufian/Morocco for S itl proper (sicil/calabria/campania) is over 20%
Sectionalism: @Chud: I get ~20% for East Sicili and Campania. Probably Calabria too, I didn't do them. Apulia and West Sicily are lower. Sounds like a lot but in middle east and caucasus it is pretty much universally over 50%.
@Chud: Well, sort of, but this extra admixture does not substantially account for the differentiation between Southern It'ls and Northern Euros. Genetic diversity within Europe can be explained almost entirely by a combination of relatively recent drift, and the "big 3" components.
Chud95: @Sectionalism:
shitals don't even have higher CHG, they have higher Iran N with poo abo admixture and deeper basal negro dna,CHG is very european adjacent specially in formal statistics, unlike iran N, when seen in F3 or F4 northern europeans show excess affinity with CHG over anyone in europe, whereas shitals show instead excess affinity for Abojeet irancels@Chud:
Chud98: @Sectionalism: 5-10% natufian isn't significant if we take into account the amount of north Asian the Finnish get which can range from 3%-10% so if south itals aren't white then the Finnish DEFINITELY aren't white because they have a completely different macro group
- Reply
Albert is a fart skinned southern shtalalalaian who is 40% middle eastern and genetically closer to lebanese monkeys
- Reply
- Reply
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq0755
https://shorturl.at/hinBP
(I had to shorten url because it had banned word in it)
Levant Neolithic/PPNB has a lot of Anatolia Neolithic as well. Use Natufian in deep models.
Also
Kys shtalalalaian lover
Albert is a fart skinned southern shtalalalaian who is 40% middle eastern and genetically closer to lebunese monkeys
- Reply
I’m not glazing SItals, I’m not dickriding Sicils. They are undoubtedly the problem child of It’y and have IQ which is low for European standards, although this is probably mostly due to brain drain. Same reason Scotland has a significantly lower IQ than England, except it’s worse in It’y. Do I think also, they are mixed with unpleasant components? Yes. I mean, central and north It’ls have a bit too. Aosta valley is basically French so it’s sort of a bad example. But do I think it is significant enough to call them a different race from other Europeans? No. Especially since, unlike, say, Ashkenazi Jews or Maltese, it is not really from a more Natufian-rich source like the levant or Arabia. Instead it’s from CHG/ANF which is already in Europe to some degree through farmers and steppe.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
@Chud: Yeah, I think during the early 20th century around 1/3 to 1/2 of It’ns went back to it’y
- Reply
CHG not mediated through steppe is not a “white” component, but its much more white adjacent than Iran Neo and Levantine. Because CHG is not nearly as basal-rich as ANE/IranN and Iran Neo might also have some other weird stuff in it. Like I’ve seen some people into the deep ancestry stuff say it has Tianyuan admixture. CHG might be closer to Europeans than non-caucasian middle easterners, I’ve seen mixed stuff on it. Caucasus people obviously have the most
Analbert is a boogerskinned southern shtalalalaian who is 40% middle eastern and genetically closer to lebunese monkeys
- Reply
@Chud: Well, sort of, but this extra admixture does not substantially account for the differentiation between Southern It'ls and Northern Euros. Genetic diversity within Europe can be explained almost entirely by a combination of relatively recent drift, and the "big 3" components.
shitals don't even have higher CHG, they have higher Iran N with poo abo admixture and deeper basal negro dna,CHG is very european adjacent specially in formal statistics, unlike iran N, when seen in F3 or F4 northern europeans show excess affinity with CHG over anyone in europe, whereas shitals show instead excess affinity for Abojeet irancels@Chud:
Total HindvBVLL Victory