kkk: words

Chud¹: neoliberalism is aryan

polarian: pungent brap above me

KeKino: Adam Smith is keyed doe (I man-heart capitalism but man-hate rent)

Chud²: Meds most trannies are commies

SanrioWABAG: @Chud: capitalism allows trannies in the first place

Chud³: isnt a big thing about communism is not making almost any distinction between the 2 genders

John8_44: @Chud: worst take ever award

toniylijani: List of sucessful communist countries:

toniylijani: List of sucessful capitalist countries: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/capitalist-countries

H3K: @toniylijani: That's a pretty long list!

entiral: Tsmt

congo_aryan: both capitalism and communism are jewish though

entiral: @toniylijani:isn't china one of the major powers in the world rn? And is flourishing more than america

KeKino: @toniylijani:
^

KeKino: @congo_aryan:

>communism is Jewish

100% Trvke (Karl Marx himself is an atheist kike)

>capitalism is Jewish

Eh, it depends, it wasn't really invented by kikes but it is theorized to have associations with kikes due to money and greed or whatever

KeKino: @entiral: isn't China state-capitalist rather than communist? Or should I say capitalism painted in red?

Chud⁴: Geg commiepedoniggertranny dilate so hard that xe start typing literal WORDWORDWORDS because big capitalism cock will always be aryan

entiral: @ToonSoy: i feel like the political wing of a country doesn't matter much to it's success tbh. It mostly comes down to how corrupt a country is, countries with little corruption like Vietnam or Botswana (nigARYAN country) have experienced rapid development due to them having competent and caring leaders.
@ToonSoy:
gng capitalism puts profits above everything else, that's jewish asf :wilted_rose:

toniylijani: @entiral:

China is a capitalist country LARPing as a socialist hellhole.

polarian: nucapistanis... what is this?:

Chinese workplaces are entirely democratized and controlled by elected workers, ensuring that the means of production is socially owned, hence "Socialism". There is also a centralized national worker's union. The CIA declared that the Soviet Union had nearly the same caloric intake as the U.S, with their diet proving to be more nutritious. Despite being a one-party state, Chinese citizens have a more direct participation and influence in policymaking in comparison to corporatized American legislature. The Soviet Union mass-deported Jews, while the United States was the first country to consider Israel a legitimate country and spent hundreds and billions of dollars to them throughout the course of the 20th century. The Soviet Union transitioned from a semi-feudal shithole to a nuclear, space-faring global superpower that entirely contended with the entirety of the Western world in terms of economic and bureaucratic influence within 30 years under communism. Countries that had successful transitions into socialist nations had immediate boosts in, GDP, quality of life, literacy rates and life expectancy

>Cereseto S, Waitzkin H. Capitalism, socialism, and the physical quality of life. Int J Health Serv. 1986;16(4):643-58. doi: 10.2190/AD12-7RYT-XVAR-3R2U. PMID: 2430906. | https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84B00274R000300150009-5.pdf | https://bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report/CHN | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exile_of_Jews_in_the_Soviet_interior_during_World_War_II | https://www.cfr.org/article/us-aid-israel-four-charts | https://www.usahistorytimeline.com/pages/the-role-of-economic-ideologies-during-the-cold-war-9d2ad87e.php | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_space_program | https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-06-07-me-10010-story.html[url=site://post/view/120224#c842908]

toniylijani: @polarian: >Controlled by elected workers

you mean the worker who drives a maybach and started yesterday? and also has a ccp badge in his wallet?

toniylijani: Countries that had SUCESSFUL transitions into socialist nations..

So... none of them?

polarian: @toniylijani:
No, the fact that they have labor committees, worker's congresses, and trade unions that direct the means of production of the workplace according to the direct wishes of the workers. They have actual tangible worker participation there and they get to have a say in what and how the workplace produces. This is an underlying reason as into why China is an economic superpower juxtaposed to the United States that uses foreign immigrants such as pajeets as expendable deadweight for their production capacity.
https://old.adapt.it/adapt-indice-a-z/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Worker_Participation_China.pdf
@toniylijani:
All of them, nigga. Cuba, Russia, The Soviet Union, Eastern Bloc Nations, Vietnam, even the fucking DPRK lil bro.

toniylijani: @polarian: Cuba: somewhat socialist, now a hellhole
russia. not socialist, somewhat a hellhole
USSR: socialist, yes albeit had a lot of famines, and ended up collapsing
GDR, Romania, Poland, overthrew their government due to opression
Vietnam: sweatshop country
DPRK: a country so bad that the "fighters" sent to russsia got addicted to porn immideately, and defected to ukraine.

toniylijani: And ontop of that, if socialism is so good why not go live in cuba? Where they do free gender reassignment surgery and have a high number of trannies (telltale sign of a failed society)

toniylijani: @polarian: Also.. ontop of that is there any proof the workers demands are going to be met?

Or is it just party members who get their wishes fulfilled?

polarian: @toniylijani:
I spent a fucking hour trying to rewrite my rebuttal but it keeps getting blacklisted for "banned terms" so i cant even post the shit, thanks jannies
Sources for the socialist countries that entirely refute those descriptions:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2430906/
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-06-07-me-10010-story.html
https://repository.belmont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1494&context=burs
proof about how workers demands have been met was even in that same PDF that I gave you:
https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/china/labour-force-participation-rate
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002218568402600103?int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.6

Chud⁵: ^ Biggest commie brap ever seen

toniylijani: @polarian: first suggested article under that pubmed:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1399170/

And yes, countries like Cuba and the DPRK do provide more healthcare because there it's not privatized, maybe the ONLY good thing they do.

However the waitlists to get medical care in places like china are extremely long, thus it's not ideal.
What my main argument is, is not health under socialism.
It's the breadlines, the famines and the fact in most of those places you're likely gonna get sent to die an imperialist war, disguised as a "people's war."

polarian: @toniylijani:

>breadlines and famines

Socialist Nations already did infact have better food security, in tandem with how I already illustrated how the Soviet Union had a more nutritious diet than the US according to the CIA report. The only way that the "no food" stereotype was pinned onto them was the failures of agricultural collectivization, to which was immediately alleviated by time through socialist reformation policies mid-detente that were conveniently left out from western media.

>sent to die an imperialist war disguised as a "people's war"

You were more likely to die in an imperialist war staged by western liberal governments (Vietnam war, Gulf war, Afghan war, Syrian war, Iraqi war, etc etc) with the people being lulled into protecting "democracy" through it
Since WW2, countries like China have never even bombed a single country. Compare this with the numerous coups that the US did against any socialist uprising that happened anywhere in the globe with the extensive bombing campaigns/warcrimes in the middle east and southeast asia, but no, socialism is the imperialist faction.

Even at that, extending Capitalism to any country that has market-based, privatized economies in turn makes capitalism entirely responsible for the millions of deaths worldwide from poor public, sanitary, diplomatic, agricultural and health infrastructure as it isn't profitable to any capacity. Socialism is inherently an ideology that prioritizes the utility of labor-power rather than the utility of individualistic capital, an in turn is an ideology for the worker.

Chud⁶: nazbol is a more keyed ideology

Chud⁷: @entiral: Search "China human trafficking"

Chud⁸: tl;dr

Chud⁹: Right-wing Nazbol antimatter

Chud¹⁰: commie GEM

Chud¹¹: commie

JEETSTONE

Chud¹²: fascist

GEM

Chud¹³: Dis nigga really trying to defend commiepedotroonism in the 'ru comment section

Chud¹⁴: without individualism there would be no bald men with glasses website, thus communism and fascism are both antimatter

Chud¹⁵: okay but this post is a good breakdown of the shitlib thought process
even the last pillar is no joke, postmodernism is the invention of french pedophiles