2 months ago#150834
furries shouldnt breed and pollute the gene pool
womanburner
OHNONONONO ZOOPEDOCATTROONS WHATS DIS https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778266/ GEEEEGGGGGGG
2 months ago#156424
we start with you zoopedotroon
womanburner
OHNONONONO ZOOPEDOCATTROONS WHATS DIS https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778266/ GEEEEGGGGGGG

MenstrualCykill
Freedom
2 months ago#156443
The irony of OP being in support of eugenics
Zonky
PM me if you need something
2 months ago#156445
I would rather the government say I’m not fit for the affordable care act as opposed to not being fit for being able to something that we are designed to do as human beingslisterinally applies to anything award 🏅thats an inherent problem with the government itself, not with the practiceShow quoted text
eugenics is stupid as fuck because at any moment the government could decide you aren’t fit for having kids
deliriant99
soybooru must serve as an archive
2 months ago#193946
I'm not seeing enough G25 slop
amogusimposter
Analects Chapter 1 Line 6
2 months ago#195832
nothing wrong with eugenics as long as youre not killing people against their wills. i do think some people shouldnt breed
muscular_engineer
Inventor of the Mineral Inspecteur Soyjak
2 months ago#195954
i would support eugenics if it was gene editing people's kids to be gigachads and not cutting off your nuts because you aren't a gigachad yourself
Garzon
Have you seen the amount of queer people on this site? There's also those who are obsessed with BBC
2 months ago#196354
You have to think about it long term, if you cut off your nuts and gigachad doesn't then the next generation will be more giga per capita.i would support eugenics if it was gene editing people's kids to be gigachads and not cutting off your nuts because you aren't a gigachad yourself
Pseudo
Shine bright
Gay and cucked. If that's someone's mindset though then I wont cry if they cut their balls off. We already have the technology to artificially create the pressures to foster a more thoughtful and healthy civilization but we don't even do that. Therefore, we cannot take eugenics seriously because when we obtain the technology for it, then without a doubt it will be financially sectioned off to the the upper middle class and wealthy who will likely use it to make sure their kids are autistic 7 foot tall freaks or something. There's already technology for embryo selection, in which an embryo with possibly more desirable traits is selected manually by a doctor for insemination, and that's limited to the wealthy too. Repeating myself here, but I like the idea of eugenics but in our current system it can't be taken seriously. We have technological problems, but politics and economy are the larger blockades.You have to think about it long term, if you cut off your nuts and gigachad doesn't then the next generation will be more giga per capita.Show quoted text
i would support eugenics if it was gene editing people's kids to be gigachads and not cutting off your nuts because you aren't a gigachad yourself
TL;DR you don't wanna put eugenics in the hands of the zog or the jews are blamed for everything
muscular_engineer
Inventor of the Mineral Inspecteur Soyjak
2 months ago#196713
yes but what if i didn't cut off my nuts and i released inside your mom insteadYou have to think about it long term, if you cut off your nuts and gigachad doesn't then the next generation will be more giga per capita.Show quoted text
i would support eugenics if it was gene editing people's kids to be gigachads and not cutting off your nuts because you aren't a gigachad yourself
Log in to reply to this thread.
