6 days ago#1331973
WBAN ALL PORNShow quoted text
In this context it also has to be completely independent from the motive of depicting a substitute, replacement or recreation of cacajak. Which is done by making it completely unassociated, and i deem this almost impossible because anyone who tries this knows why they are doing it, they want to be called pædophile.Show quoted text
You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend. Perhaps if you grabbed an adult that is not derived from bernd, who happens to have a beard, put a binky on him that does not have association with caca, perhaps we can call it such.
You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
If cacajak porn wave never existed, perhaps i may see a possibility.
6 days ago#1331989
Even cado?BAN ALL PORNShow quoted text
In this context it also has to be completely independent from the motive of depicting a substitute, replacement or recreation of cacajak. Which is done by making it completely unassociated, and i deem this almost impossible because anyone who tries this knows why they are doing it, they want to be called pædophile.Show quoted text
You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend. Perhaps if you grabbed an adult that is not derived from bernd, who happens to have a beard, put a binky on him that does not have association with caca, perhaps we can call it such.
You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
If cacajak porn wave never existed, perhaps i may see a possibility.
Margarine_Man
I AM FULL OF HATE
6 days ago#1332017
So you just want to throw away something that has been in the Soysphere for a long time and been accepted by many? Admittedly not what it used to be since it get misused but it is more of a destroyed history than a coin slot your trying to destroy.
Margarine_Man
I AM FULL OF HATE
>wanting to throw away something that has been in the Soysphere for a long time and been accepted by manySo you just want to throw away something that has been in the Soysphere for a long time and been accepted by many? Admittedly not what it used to be since it get misused but it is more of a destroyed history than a coin slot your trying to destroy.Show quoted text
YES
6 days ago#1332037
False dichotomy again, trying to desperately put more words in my mouth than you stuff serbian cocks up your ass.No, Gold, by depicting Doll as a babyjak you're depicting an ADULT as a babyjak. No amount of arbitrary culture nonsense can get past this fact. Is Doll not an adult? Are those posts not depicting Doll? Answering negatively to one of these guarantees absurdity.Show quoted text
Only if it is DOLL since you are just depicting babyjak without changing any aspects that does not distance itself from caca.
Stop comparing apples and oranges, stop pretending things dont exist, also admit you think culture matters.
Culture matters, you admitted to it. DOLL is an adult. Cacajak is not. You simply putting cacajak through an AI is still a depiction of caca. If we put shitlita through an ai and somehow she looks like a young woman, does that suddenly make it okay? No, still an expression of shitlita, and a depiction of it.
>B-but le different origins
Does not negate the argument, you admitted culture matters so please stop the pretending. The inverted swastika and normal swastika shows the same effect when you fly the nazi flag or hindu swastika in Poland, the locals will not be fond of it regardless how you fly it, and thus it is inappropiate. And i bet any person who graffitis swastikas, regardless of the origin of inverted or eastern on a synagogue will be regarded as someone who is not fond of jews, an expression of antisemitism. Does it suddenly mean something else because he drew the swastikas the other way, due to their origin? No, it is the same expression.
6 days ago#1332040
You, my good sir have lost a vote. Enjoy this downvote.>wanting to throw away something that has been in the Soysphere for a long time and been accepted by manyShow quoted text
So you just want to throw away something that has been in the Soysphere for a long time and been accepted by many? Admittedly not what it used to be since it get misused but it is more of a destroyed history than a coin slot your trying to destroy.Show quoted text
YES
Margarine_Man
I AM FULL OF HATE
Margarine_Man
I AM FULL OF HATE
Olgol
Enemy of the fatherless nation (Shroom)
6 days ago#1332077
Gold the Timmycel this response still fails.False dichotomy again, trying to desperately put more words in my mouth than you stuff serbian cocks up your ass.Show quoted text
No, Gold, by depicting Doll as a babyjak you're depicting an ADULT as a babyjak. No amount of arbitrary culture nonsense can get past this fact. Is Doll not an adult? Are those posts not depicting Doll? Answering negatively to one of these guarantees absurdity.
Culture matters, you admitted to it. DOLL is an adult. Cacajak is not. You simply putting cacajak through an AI is still a depiction of caca. If we put shitlita through an ai and somehow she looks like a young woman, does that suddenly make it okay? No, still an expression of shitlita, and a depiction of it.
>B-but le different origins
Does not negate the argument, you admitted culture matters so please stop the pretending. The inverted swastika and normal swastika shows the same effect when you fly the nazi flag or hindu swastika in Poland, the locals will not be fond of it regardless how you fly it, and thus it is inappropiate. And i bet any person who graffitis swastikas, regardless of the origin of inverted or eastern on a synagogue will be regarded as someone who is not fond of jews, an expression of antisemitism. Does it suddenly mean something else because he drew the swastikas the other way, due to their origin? No, it is the same expression.
No, I used culture to show that even under your premises you still face a contradiction. Personally in my analysis culture is obsolete, a useless reason so consider something ban worthy or not. Doll is an adult, cacajak is age neutral. This is not a cultural truth, this is an empirical truth
And sure, Soylita could in some cases be mistaken with a young woman. But we have the thread where it originated, it has been archived. That we know the intentions of the people who created her should solve any ambiguity as to how old she is.
It does negate the argument. And I never said that culture matters I just used your own principles against you.
And Re: the polish example, it doesn't work. It only works if the locals don't know the difference. If the locals knew the difference and what the Hindu swastika actually represents, they would be fine with it, 100%
The expression is different
6 days ago#1332136
DOLL being an adult only works because the way he is depicted actually is visible, notable and culturally significant enough for someone to say "yeah that is not caca, the kid, that is DOLL, the 30 something admin that caca calls "dada" because it is actually an adult" who is depicted fatter, and larger.False dichotomy again, trying to desperately put more words in my mouth than you stuff serbian cocks up your ass.Show quoted text
No, Gold, by depicting Doll as a babyjak you're depicting an ADULT as a babyjak. No amount of arbitrary culture nonsense can get past this fact. Is Doll not an adult? Are those posts not depicting Doll? Answering negatively to one of these guarantees absurdity.
Culture matters, you admitted to it. DOLL is an adult. Cacajak is not. You simply putting cacajak through an AI is still a depiction of caca. If we put shitlita through an ai and somehow she looks like a young woman, does that suddenly make it okay? No, still an expression of shitlita, and a depiction of it.
>B-but le different origins
Does not negate the argument, you admitted culture matters so please stop the pretending. The inverted swastika and normal swastika shows the same effect when you fly the nazi flag or hindu swastika in Poland, the locals will not be fond of it regardless how you fly it, and thus it is inappropiate. And i bet any person who graffitis swastikas, regardless of the origin of inverted or eastern on a synagogue will be regarded as someone who is not fond of jews, an expression of antisemitism. Does it suddenly mean something else because he drew the swastikas the other way, due to their origin? No, it is the same expression.
Olgol
Enemy of the fatherless nation (Shroom)
6 days ago#1332157
Moving the goalposts again. Nice.DOLL being an adult only works because the way he is depicted actually is visible, notable and culturally significant enough for someone to say "yeah that is not caca, the kid, that is DOLL, the 30 something admin that caca calls "dada" because it is actually an adult" who is depicted fatter, and larger.Show quoted text
False dichotomy again, trying to desperately put more words in my mouth than you stuff serbian cocks up your ass.
Culture matters, you admitted to it. DOLL is an adult. Cacajak is not. You simply putting cacajak through an AI is still a depiction of caca. If we put shitlita through an ai and somehow she looks like a young woman, does that suddenly make it okay? No, still an expression of shitlita, and a depiction of it.
>B-but le different origins
Does not negate the argument, you admitted culture matters so please stop the pretending. The inverted swastika and normal swastika shows the same effect when you fly the nazi flag or hindu swastika in Poland, the locals will not be fond of it regardless how you fly it, and thus it is inappropiate. And i bet any person who graffitis swastikas, regardless of the origin of inverted or eastern on a synagogue will be regarded as someone who is not fond of jews, an expression of antisemitism. Does it suddenly mean something else because he drew the swastikas the other way, due to their origin? No, it is the same expression.
Is this a babyjak? I think the physique is "visible, notable and culturally significant" enough for someone to say "hey that is babyjak but a gigachad, glad he grew up"
6 days ago#1332200
Origin does not matter, culture and current meaning matters, and you have to use my logic now because you are my slave. Culture may be dependent on the origin, which is how it can matter, but that means my point still standsGold the Timmycel this response still fails.Show quoted text
False dichotomy again, trying to desperately put more words in my mouth than you stuff serbian cocks up your ass.
Culture matters, you admitted to it. DOLL is an adult. Cacajak is not. You simply putting cacajak through an AI is still a depiction of caca. If we put shitlita through an ai and somehow she looks like a young woman, does that suddenly make it okay? No, still an expression of shitlita, and a depiction of it.
>B-but le different origins
Does not negate the argument, you admitted culture matters so please stop the pretending. The inverted swastika and normal swastika shows the same effect when you fly the nazi flag or hindu swastika in Poland, the locals will not be fond of it regardless how you fly it, and thus it is inappropiate. And i bet any person who graffitis swastikas, regardless of the origin of inverted or eastern on a synagogue will be regarded as someone who is not fond of jews, an expression of antisemitism. Does it suddenly mean something else because he drew the swastikas the other way, due to their origin? No, it is the same expression.
No, I used culture to show that even under your premises you still face a contradiction. Personally in my analysis culture is obsolete, a useless reason so consider something ban worthy or not. Doll is an adult, cacajak is age neutral. This is not a cultural truth, this is an empirical truth
And sure, Soylita could in some cases be mistaken with a young woman. But we have the thread where it originated, it has been archived. That we know the intentions of the people who created her should solve any ambiguity as to how old she is.
It does negate the argument. And I never said that culture matters I just used your own principles against you.
And Re: the polish example, it doesn't work. It only works if the locals don't know the difference. If the locals knew the difference and what the Hindu swastika actually represents, they would be fine with it, 100%
The expression is different
Also very convenient you ignored the synagogue, you thought you could escape LOL.
Jonkler
TheCatalan1977
6 days ago#1332226
What synagogue?Origin does not matter, culture and current meaning matters, and you have to use my logic now because you are my slave. Culture may be dependent on the origin, which is how it can matter, but that means my point still standsShow quoted text
Gold the Timmycel this response still fails.
No, I used culture to show that even under your premises you still face a contradiction. Personally in my analysis culture is obsolete, a useless reason so consider something ban worthy or not. Doll is an adult, cacajak is age neutral. This is not a cultural truth, this is an empirical truth
And sure, Soylita could in some cases be mistaken with a young woman. But we have the thread where it originated, it has been archived. That we know the intentions of the people who created her should solve any ambiguity as to how old she is.
It does negate the argument. And I never said that culture matters I just used your own principles against you.
And Re: the polish example, it doesn't work. It only works if the locals don't know the difference. If the locals knew the difference and what the Hindu swastika actually represents, they would be fine with it, 100%
The expression is different
Also very convenient you ignored the synagogue, you thought you could escape LOL.
Log in to reply to this thread.