supersagecoal
What is popping, 'jakkers? Jeff here. I'm ready to make gemmy OC
6 days ago#1331858
bump
supersagecoal
What is popping, 'jakkers? Jeff here. I'm ready to make gemmy OC
6 days ago#1331874
Turrican has rose up in votes
supersagecoal
What is popping, 'jakkers? Jeff here. I'm ready to make gemmy OC
6 days ago#1331883
6 days ago#1331892
6 days ago#1331911
Only if it is DOLL since you are just depicting babyjak without changing any aspects that does not distance itself from caca.No that isn't the point. Then the senate is just referendums 2.0. It loses its force.Show quoted text
Yeah that is the point.
Also DOLL is a person, just making babyjak literally realistically depicted as an adult through AI does not count as depicting him as an adult. You are depicting babyjak. Not DOLL. You are comparing apples and oranges!
Also Doll is an adult, which means that if a Doll babyjak exists, so does an adult babyjak. This is literally just logical deduction, nothing more and nothing less. You lost already
Stop comparing apples and oranges, stop pretending things dont exist, also admit you think culture matters.
Olgol
Enemy of the fatherless nation (Shroom)
6 days ago#1331923
No, Gold, by depicting Doll as a babyjak you're depicting an ADULT as a babyjak. No amount of arbitrary culture nonsense can get past this fact. Is Doll not an adult? Are those posts not depicting Doll? Answering negatively to one of these guarantees absurdity.Only if it is DOLL since you are just depicting babyjak without changing any aspects that does not distance itself from caca.Show quoted text
No that isn't the point. Then the senate is just referendums 2.0. It loses its force.
Also Doll is an adult, which means that if a Doll babyjak exists, so does an adult babyjak. This is literally just logical deduction, nothing more and nothing less. You lost already
Stop comparing apples and oranges, stop pretending things dont exist, also admit you think culture matters.
Margarine_Man
I AM FULL OF HATE
6 days ago#1331928
HOW AM I DOING
6 days ago#1331933
More people need to immediately fucking vote for me
Margarine_Man
I AM FULL OF HATE
6 days ago#1331937
You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend. Perhaps if you grabbed an adult that is not derived from bernd, who happens to have a beard, put a binky on him that does not have association with caca, perhaps we can call it such.Only if it is DOLL since you are just depicting babyjak without changing any aspects that does not distance itself from caca.Show quoted text
No that isn't the point. Then the senate is just referendums 2.0. It loses its force.
Also Doll is an adult, which means that if a Doll babyjak exists, so does an adult babyjak. This is literally just logical deduction, nothing more and nothing less. You lost already
Stop comparing apples and oranges, stop pretending things dont exist, also admit you think culture matters.
You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
6 days ago#1331949
In this context it also has to be completely independent from the motive of depicting a substitute, replacement or recreation of cacajak. Which is done by making it completely unassociated, and i deem this almost impossible because anyone who tries this knows why they are doing it, they want to be called pædophile.You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend. Perhaps if you grabbed an adult that is not derived from bernd, who happens to have a beard, put a binky on him that does not have association with caca, perhaps we can call it such.Show quoted text
Only if it is DOLL since you are just depicting babyjak without changing any aspects that does not distance itself from caca.
Stop comparing apples and oranges, stop pretending things dont exist, also admit you think culture matters.
You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
If cacajak porn wave never existed, perhaps i may see a possibility.
Margarine_Man
I AM FULL OF HATE
6 days ago#1331951
BAN ALL PORNIn this context it also has to be completely independent from the motive of depicting a substitute, replacement or recreation of cacajak. Which is done by making it completely unassociated, and i deem this almost impossible because anyone who tries this knows why they are doing it, they want to be called pædophile.Show quoted text
You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend. Perhaps if you grabbed an adult that is not derived from bernd, who happens to have a beard, put a binky on him that does not have association with caca, perhaps we can call it such.
You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
If cacajak porn wave never existed, perhaps i may see a possibility.
Olgol
Enemy of the fatherless nation (Shroom)
6 days ago#1331961
Lots of talk yet still no answer to my question.You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend. Perhaps if you grabbed an adult that is not derived from bernd, who happens to have a beard, put a binky on him that does not have association with caca, perhaps we can call it such.Show quoted text
Only if it is DOLL since you are just depicting babyjak without changing any aspects that does not distance itself from caca.
Stop comparing apples and oranges, stop pretending things dont exist, also admit you think culture matters.
You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
>You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend
Uh yes it fucking does, it looks like a caca because it uses the babyjak subvariant. And you always ignore the other aspects like the stubble and the obese body. Biologically speaking, that's an adult. So this "culture" can go fuck itself, it has precisely zero authority on the visual reality of the post you are looking at.
>You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
Well that character just gained another cultural meaning at few months ago. Culture has no authority, instead let us decide based on pure visual information and the prior usage of the character.
>We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
Even though the Nazi swastika is tilted 45 degrees to the right, while the Hindu one isn't. And just because they feel uneasy looking at it doesn't mean that it represents the Nazi swastika.
Olgol
Enemy of the fatherless nation (Shroom)
6 days ago#1331972
No people are doing it because you guys leak over it. If someone posted an image of babyjak to TikTok and spammed it all over the place, nobody would care. All the fagphilia you're seeing is in your mind, which means that it really isn't fagphilicIn this context it also has to be completely independent from the motive of depicting a substitute, replacement or recreation of cacajak. Which is done by making it completely unassociated, and i deem this almost impossible because anyone who tries this knows why they are doing it, they want to be called pædophile.Show quoted text
You just suddenly deciding it is an adult, pretending it is an expression of such, while purposefully keeping it such to make it look like caca, does not make it an implied adult due to the nature of the trend. Perhaps if you grabbed an adult that is not derived from bernd, who happens to have a beard, put a binky on him that does not have association with caca, perhaps we can call it such.
You are still implying the expression and depiction of a character that has a cultural meaning.
We cannot put giant buddha statues with giant swastikas in Warsaw, the cultural meaning of swastikas for the poles is different. Even if the non-inverted cross means peace and tranquility in Nepal or India.
If cacajak porn wave never existed, perhaps i may see a possibility.
Log in to reply to this thread.