Chud: ^Brap

Chud:

Chud:

TTDMachine5000: I look like this

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

Soob1234: tvke above me

Chud: two muscular A10 lightskin beasts above me

XXX_YAKUBSGRAFTINGDESCENDANT_XXX: My artist tag? I don't take responsibility for raisinty flagspam.

TTDMachine5000: I look like this

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

Chud: https://stroimsami.zt.ua/ElektricheskayaProvodka/dvost-nn-dimar-z-nerzhav-ucho-kislotost-yko-stal-nad-yn-st-ta-efektivn-st

Chud: https://intersect.host/servers

Chud: i say this but chud1 is right

Chud: I don't say this and chud2 is right

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

Hills: Dust.

Chud:

Chud: This is how every Fooey chads look like. Plus, Joe Lowsac/RaHoWarrior has been raising hell there since he got banned here. I guess that explains why more Fooey chads are coming here to take a dump on the sharty.

Chud: Joe Brapbro

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

YobaPeaches156: literal who

Chud¹: looks cursed with brown hair doe

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

Chud¹: make xir browner, uglier and fatter and you get a m3xitvrd

Alfietheboorufag: does he have a license for that?

ConservativeWaluigi: [url=site://post/view/136294#c1084719]@Alfiethebooruflamboyant person[/url]: Xhe's going to shoot (You) for misgendering xer

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

Chud: @Astrofene: FPE is antimatter thoughbeit

Chud: @Astrofene: Astrofene, are you a FPEchad?

TTDMachine5000: I look like this

Alfietheboorufag: @TTDMachine5000: you typed the same message on 2 other posts featuring this strange TV....

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

beefsoup: congrats

TermiteSilva: @beefsoup: thanks

TermiteSilva: @Black_Watch: yes

Alfietheboorufag: i still wonder why this guy LARPs as a termite

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

Silberfisch: Unfunny ugly personstone

Chud: cemetery comment section

Chud: @Warrior-Z: [thumb]89447[thumb]

Chud: @Warrior-Z:

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy:

KeKino: Thx for ACTUALLY tagging your own posts, you really never deserved to be a Janny for forcing others to tag your posts back then

Chud: bromigo come back

Chud: Add tag nas:pepe

Magnus: @Chud: Done.

professornothingburger2: Assuming Batman holds a Christian ethical worldview... (and he usually does), no it is not nonsensical to have that worldview, and even then you could justify his no kill rule simply by saying he believes all justices should be carried out to their end by the Law system, and since he himself is literally not a judge nor jury or executioner, he has to let the actual judges, jury and executioners EXECUTE their laws on the villains of Gotham... The only reason Joker has never been executed is because of insanity plea, and this is perfectly in line with how actual New Jersey law operates. Bane? Hes a foreign terrorist with a small country at his back and is practically bullet proof, he might even survive an electric chair, depending on how you scale him. Deathstroke? Too valuable of an asset to the US government and Amanda Waller to execute, and he has the league of shadows at his back, especially after marrying Lady Shiva. Ra's al ghul? He literally cannot die as his league of assassins will always overthrow or infiltrate whatever government tries to contain him and put him in a Lazarus pit, you'd have to find a justifiable reason for the U?S government to want or care about literally vaporizing him... and EVEN THEN his descendants and subordinates will take his place as the Head of the demon... I could go on and on about why each villain REALISTICALLY either wouldn't get executed, would only be imprisoned, or would be literally UNCONTAINABLE in the long term, like Clayface or Solomon Grundy. So even if Batman attempted to kill every single one of his villains, Deathstroke is literally rivaling him in combat prowess, and Solomon Grundy is a straight up Superman contending villain multiple times, so Batman having no qualms about killing wouldn't even do much for the story, there's also the fact that Joker being killed would canonically lead to the Batman who laughs... who literally ended up murdering the entire bat family and putting the ENTIRE DC MULTIVERSE as risk, to the point it took Mobius Chair Wally (The Fastest character in fiction)The Justice league and plenty of DC's hardest hitters to take down the Darkest Knight... So tell me.. HOW does Batman killing all his villains benefit him in any way... it results in him abandoning most of his morals entirely... it falsely presumes that ALL of Batman's villains deserve execution, (which is stupid, considering the nuance in Mr. Freeze, Grundy, Man-bat, White Bunny and plenty of other's stories. On TOP of the aforementioned DIMENSIONAL catastrophe that could result just off of Batman killing joker alone... So this video missed EVERY mark imaginable, you have to prove that EVERY Batman villain EVER is deserving of execution and is impossible to rehabilitate... you have to demonstrate why this somehow wouldn't contradict Batman's moral groundings... and then you have to demonstrate why Batman's villains either wouldn't be brought back to life, instantly replaced, or Near impossible to kill by traditional means already. Learn The Batman Mythos or don't speak on it at all, just because the Snyder goof thinks Batman should kill doesn't now mean it makes sense and should be how Batman operates. :joy: