SoyBooru
showing 10 of 17 comments
Seeing all the artists leaking over this is tiring, these flamboyant persons are reaching jartychad levels of obsession, and this is coming from a fellow drawflamboyant person.
@Sectionalism: Normalflamboyant persons are easy to entertain, also there's people doing the exact same raisin on the sharty but with Google AI and jaks.
>PICK UP LE PENCIL
>MIYAZAKI HATES STUFF LIKE THIS, LOOK AT THIS CLIP
>IMMA WHEEL ARTIST, LOOK AT THIS PICTURE I MADE, GIVE ME VALIDATION RIGHT NOW
@Sectionalism: Normalflamboyant persons are easy to entertain, also there's people doing the exact same raisin on the sharty but with Google AI and jaks.
@BrimstoneProduction: i hate angloid artists so much it's unreal
we need an ai model that raisins out the unironic slopjak stuff tumblrtards draw to feel morally superior (like obesity, vitiligo, gender flags, and just general uglyness)
we need an ai model that raisins out the unironic slopjak stuff tumblrtards draw to feel morally superior (like obesity, vitiligo, gender flags, and just general uglyness)
@BrimstoneProduction: Drawflamboyant persons are annoying so I understand countersignaling whatever they say, and I also do not like Miyazaki. But the difference between the occasional AI jak and this is that AI jaks will be entertaining a few times, meanwhile normgroids will find basically the same thing over and over entertaining for like a week straight
Atheist above me ^^^
gem
I hate AI normgroids almost as much as I loathe wifejak posters
showing 10 of 12 comments
t60 shouldn't exist albeit
@Joe_Barbaro: True brother, true
@Joe_Barbaro: it makes me more angry than it should that there is literally zero t-51 in the show, which i get that the show sucks, but how do you neglect THE west coast power armor. i fucking hate t-60. even the dumb looking "ncr power armor" they made is based on t-60.
BBC
brotherhood coal
kiss yourself obsessed mutie or however the slocum bites
4 barps above me
SOYTAN WNBAG
>BWC
showing 10 of 32 comments
Italy has my hero shatcademia which is a brown libtard ugly person reddit show that I hate therefore Argentina gemmyer
Kill raisingentinians
energem
Decepticoons lost
Decepticons aren't traitors doughever
Now only the Analbots can save us from Megaugly person and his Molesticons. o algo
fixed date o algo
>2025
.5
idk this rick ross feller but if schwaub doesnt like him i guess he must be a pretty swell guy
@Chud: rick ross is an gemmy king
Rick may is ballin' in poonerhaven
I looked like this when trevor got banned though
I looked like this when trevor got banned though
"wash your dick" - jordan peterson
>chud, being a bigot just makes me feel more valid!
Olgol
@MenstrualCykill: trvke
@MenstrualCykill: sybau
Tis be olgol
showing 10 of 35 comments
@Sectionalism: You really did. Your "critique" of utilitarianism is a critique of materialism, and how for materialists it is inconsistent to be a utilitarian. Again how you think physicalism being wrong means utilitarianism's utility is also wrong is insane. They arent connected at all.
Not measurable by any outside figure. You cant measure someone's head and see how they feel. Utilitarianism is just a theory of what is best (if the circumstances are most apparent). Only the subject being questioned can answer that. This actually an argument against utilitarianism based on intuition, where the anti utilitarian tries to pick apart the intuition of the utilitarian. Safe to say that that can be done on any ethical system. Neither deontology nor virtue ethics are safe.
It has a qualitative factor to it under idealism. Pleasure and pain are real qualia, they are experienced. "Justice" and "virtue" are abstract post-hoc systems. I dont experience "virtue", and even if I did, it would probably be happiness in connection to something I previously wanted to happen. "Virtue" kind of loses its appeal then.
Almost everyone was accused by the old fuck, even his great teacher (not actually, but Schopenhauer was his idol for a time). But today idealists (think Brapnardo chadstrup, or Donald Hoffmann) are all about Jungianism and "meaning crisis". Schopenhauer was the best idealist (even tho thats questionable), as he was also an antinatalGOD.
>Hedonic calculus makes no sense because pleasure/preference is intrinsically un-measurable.
Not measurable by any outside figure. You cant measure someone's head and see how they feel. Utilitarianism is just a theory of what is best (if the circumstances are most apparent). Only the subject being questioned can answer that. This actually an argument against utilitarianism based on intuition, where the anti utilitarian tries to pick apart the intuition of the utilitarian. Safe to say that that can be done on any ethical system. Neither deontology nor virtue ethics are safe.
>Even if you are an idealist, this remains the case, and utilitarianism becomes no more precise than virtue ethics or deontology.
It has a qualitative factor to it under idealism. Pleasure and pain are real qualia, they are experienced. "Justice" and "virtue" are abstract post-hoc systems. I dont experience "virtue", and even if I did, it would probably be happiness in connection to something I previously wanted to happen. "Virtue" kind of loses its appeal then.
>Most Idealists were accused by Nietzsche of being "Life-Denying" so I don't know where you got that idea from. I'm not into the "life-affirming" "Nietzschean" stuff
Almost everyone was accused by the old fuck, even his great teacher (not actually, but Schopenhauer was his idol for a time). But today idealists (think Brapnardo chadstrup, or Donald Hoffmann) are all about Jungianism and "meaning crisis". Schopenhauer was the best idealist (even tho thats questionable), as he was also an antinatalGOD.
@Olgol:
We are specifically interested in hedonic calculus with respect to outside figures, though. If utilitarianism was only about one's own happiness then it would just be hedonism. I think most virtue ethicists would argue that virtue is recognized intuitively in the same way that we recognize descriptive qualities.
It's fucking specialed that you are glazing Schopenhauer (an Indomaniac) after criticizing me for not completely disregarding the East
We are specifically interested in hedonic calculus with respect to outside figures, though. If utilitarianism was only about one's own happiness then it would just be hedonism. I think most virtue ethicists would argue that virtue is recognized intuitively in the same way that we recognize descriptive qualities.
It's fucking specialed that you are glazing Schopenhauer (an Indomaniac) after criticizing me for not completely disregarding the East
@Sectionalism: Then utilitarianism cant prove what is actually the right thing to do (as in, which choice actually causes what you want to happen). But, if we could somehow prove what will cause people happiness, then it would be objectively good to do it (as in, you will cause someone something they will objectively enjoy. Pleasure is subjective but its an objective fact that people want more of it). Thats all utilitarianism is. Anyone trying to get an 'ought' out of it is dumb. It cant provide that. But if you want to do good to someone, you should be a utilitarian. Hedonism is a lifestyle. Its like someone comparing Stoicism and virtue ethics. They are interconnected, but one is a measly lifestyle, while the other is a position that is somewhat respectable in analytic philosophy (the other isnt). Thats what makes utilitarianism and hedonism different.
smelly personism is only good insofar its pessimist. I was just reading your review of the tranime Neon Genesis diddygelion. I hate the tranime both for its diddyphilia AND its "life good, pain ignore durr" position. I can see the smelly personism you like is also like that. Thats pathetic.
smelly personism is only good insofar its pessimist. I was just reading your review of the tranime Neon Genesis diddygelion. I hate the tranime both for its diddyphilia AND its "life good, pain ignore durr" position. I can see the smelly personism you like is also like that. Thats pathetic.
@Olgol:
That's the problem. It isn't a question of when, it's a question of if, and "if" is already out of the question based on accepted characteristics of folk-psychological emotional conditions. Getting an "ought" out of Utilitarianism is the entire point of it as well as any ethical system. If your position on utilitarianism is "it is true but cannot be used to actually optimize decision making" then you're not talking about ethics.
I think not, Stoics were virtue ethicists. Stoics had their own logic/metaphysics and theory of aesthetics, it wasn't just a lifestyle. I'm not a Stoic, though.
I wrote that years ago. I'm more negative about life now than I was then. My views on Eva also evolved.
>But if we could somehow prove what will cause people happiness
That's the problem. It isn't a question of when, it's a question of if, and "if" is already out of the question based on accepted characteristics of folk-psychological emotional conditions. Getting an "ought" out of Utilitarianism is the entire point of it as well as any ethical system. If your position on utilitarianism is "it is true but cannot be used to actually optimize decision making" then you're not talking about ethics.
>It's like someone comparing Stoicism and virtue ethics
I think not, Stoics were virtue ethicists. Stoics had their own logic/metaphysics and theory of aesthetics, it wasn't just a lifestyle. I'm not a Stoic, though.
>NGE stuff
I wrote that years ago. I'm more negative about life now than I was then. My views on Eva also evolved.
This coming 11pm,all soyjak.party accounts will be CUT. This is according from the creator of soyjak.party. All the activities that was being done this time will be delay, SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. To save you're soyjak.party accounts, please forward this message to 5 threads for us to make sure that you are active user of soyjak.party. If can't pass this to 5 threads you're acount will be cut without hesitancy.
@Sectionalism: Perhaps I didn't make it clear that by "cause" I dont mean physical cause. Truthfully, I take dualism as a given when talking about utilitarianism. I believe that causation (as in one event necessarily following the previous one) can still be used for utilitarianism if possible.
You're right that for utilitarianism to be an ethical system, its supposed to give an ought. I'll concede that. But thats where I part ways with most traditional utilitarian thinking. No ethical system can give an ought, so no need to bother with it. But at the same time, utilitarianism is true in that if you want to cause 'good' (read: pleasure), then its the only true system. I know its tautological, because 'good' is still mostly based on non utilitarian intuition and I end up saying "to cause pleasure, you need to cause pleasure". To cope with this i would argue that all "virtues" promote happiness causing behaviour. I would argue that even if they dont, they are perceived that way, as in it satisfies some intuition that is comfortable. So pleasure is 'good' itself, and if you want to cause 'good', then you should be a utilitarian. If you dont, then Utilitarianism falls apart
I suppose you are more knowledgeable than me on the stoic part. You are correct that the traditional stoics had a full blown metaphysics, epistemology and whatnot. What im saying is that Stoicism as conceived in self help books and in pop psychology is a lifestyle (loosely based on some philosophy). That is exactly how hedonism differs from utilitarianism.
Aha, nice to hear! I'd say its natural to feel as though EVA is deep and all, but when its own director is a loli munching geek, who admitted he skimmed through Kierkegaard's "Sickness Unto Death" and got bored of it, I say that everyone will see through the 'P. But Im sorry that I actually attacked you like this. I admit that I just skimmed over your profile and found the weed stuff, and that I also assumed that you were an antivaxx quack (since Substack is their home) for no reason. You're more based than I expected. I take all my insults back. I apologize
You're right that for utilitarianism to be an ethical system, its supposed to give an ought. I'll concede that. But thats where I part ways with most traditional utilitarian thinking. No ethical system can give an ought, so no need to bother with it. But at the same time, utilitarianism is true in that if you want to cause 'good' (read: pleasure), then its the only true system. I know its tautological, because 'good' is still mostly based on non utilitarian intuition and I end up saying "to cause pleasure, you need to cause pleasure". To cope with this i would argue that all "virtues" promote happiness causing behaviour. I would argue that even if they dont, they are perceived that way, as in it satisfies some intuition that is comfortable. So pleasure is 'good' itself, and if you want to cause 'good', then you should be a utilitarian. If you dont, then Utilitarianism falls apart
I suppose you are more knowledgeable than me on the stoic part. You are correct that the traditional stoics had a full blown metaphysics, epistemology and whatnot. What im saying is that Stoicism as conceived in self help books and in pop psychology is a lifestyle (loosely based on some philosophy). That is exactly how hedonism differs from utilitarianism.
Aha, nice to hear! I'd say its natural to feel as though EVA is deep and all, but when its own director is a loli munching geek, who admitted he skimmed through Kierkegaard's "Sickness Unto Death" and got bored of it, I say that everyone will see through the 'P. But Im sorry that I actually attacked you like this. I admit that I just skimmed over your profile and found the weed stuff, and that I also assumed that you were an antivaxx quack (since Substack is their home) for no reason. You're more based than I expected. I take all my insults back. I apologize
This coming 11pm,all soyjak.party accounts will be CUT. This is according from the creator of soyjak.party. All the activities that was being done this time will be delay, SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. To save you're soyjak.party ac counts, please forward this message to 5 threads for us to m ake sure that you are active user of soyjak.party. If can't pass this to 5 threads yo u're acount will be cut without hesitancy.
@Olgol: Its ok. I probably have substonks which deserve more criticism than they get anyways
@Sectionalism: you made olgol's clxtty leak...
@Metro2033: good to know you're a chad
@Vergilius: guy with one post
@Metro2033: that's meursault
[url=site://post/view/165689#c1509419]@CoalFarmerTheBestNameflamboyant personInPol[/url]: guy said "on soot" as well
RIP soot he never returning now
RIP soot he never returning now
showing 10 of 38 comments
@jimbo: when
@antiswarthy: when you made 122135
@jimbo: but that was in response
@sabiopajin: geg
@antiswarthy: in response to what? i made that post on you two days after you posted that
@Garf: Thank you for gegging at this
>jakkin till a hunnid mill
>The world is yours o algo
jimbo
happy birthday rick ross!
showing 10 of 16 comments
is this supposed to be antiswarthy?
margerald
Jimbo
jimbrap
jclitty
happy birthday rick ross!
showing 10 of 11 comments
@trevor: Warrior-Z fought alongside him
@Sectionalism: approve my post
too white to be warrior-'p
forgot to make super Z brown
Supergem
He defeated rapeson, but at what cost...
"... Here we can see the connection between this state of self-delusion and conversion (regardless of the nationality of the neophyte). The essential disease of conversion is to identify the Faith with externals. 'Beard competition Orthodoxy' is a typical example of this, but so is wearing prayer knots around the wrist or wearing a large cross outside one's clothes or women wearing an exaggerated head covering. Genuine conversion is all about not being different in externals, not attention seeking, but about converting the inside. Go to any ordinary parish and you will see people dressed anonymously - they could be anyone, but maybe one of them is a saint. Genuine Orthodox Christians do not stand out, except by their example of living a good life."
marge I don't get it explain please
lord Jesus Christ have mercy upon me
@Brazilian_Chud:
I stand before the doors of thy temple, and yet I refrain not from my terrible thoughts. But do thou, O Christ God, who didst justify the publican and hadst mercy on the Canaanite woman and didst open the gates of paradise to the thief: open unto me the compassion of thy love toward mankind, and receive me as I approach and touch thee, like the harlot and the woman with the issue of blood; for the one, by but touching the hem of thy garment, received healing, and the other, by embracing thine immaculate feet, received the forgiveness of her sins. And I, who am pitiful, dare to partake of thy whole Body. Let me not be consumed, but receive me as thou didst receive them, and enlighten the senses of my soul, burning up the accusations of my sins, through the intercessions of her that without seed gave thee birth and of the heavenly powers; for thou art blessed unto ages of ages. Amen.
I believe, O Lord, and I confess that thou art truly the Christ, the Son of the living God, who didst come into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief. And I believe that this is truly thine own immaculate Body, and that this is truly thine own precious Blood. Wherefore I pray thee, have mercy upon me and forgive my transgressions both voluntary and involuntary, of word and of deed, of knowledge and of ignorance; and make me worthy to partake without condemnation of thine immaculate Mysteries, unto remission of my sins and unto life everlasting. Amen. Of thy Mystic Supper, O Son of God, accept me today as a communicant; for I will not speak of thy Mystery to thine enemies, neither will I give thee a kiss as did Judas; but like the thief will I confess thee: Remember me, O Lord, in thy Kingdom. Not unto judgment nor unto condemnation be my partaking of thy Holy Mysteries, O Lord, but unto the healing of soul and body.
I stand before the doors of thy temple, and yet I refrain not from my terrible thoughts. But do thou, O Christ God, who didst justify the publican and hadst mercy on the Canaanite woman and didst open the gates of paradise to the thief: open unto me the compassion of thy love toward mankind, and receive me as I approach and touch thee, like the harlot and the woman with the issue of blood; for the one, by but touching the hem of thy garment, received healing, and the other, by embracing thine immaculate feet, received the forgiveness of her sins. And I, who am pitiful, dare to partake of thy whole Body. Let me not be consumed, but receive me as thou didst receive them, and enlighten the senses of my soul, burning up the accusations of my sins, through the intercessions of her that without seed gave thee birth and of the heavenly powers; for thou art blessed unto ages of ages. Amen.
I believe, O Lord, and I confess that thou art truly the Christ, the Son of the living God, who didst come into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief. And I believe that this is truly thine own immaculate Body, and that this is truly thine own precious Blood. Wherefore I pray thee, have mercy upon me and forgive my transgressions both voluntary and involuntary, of word and of deed, of knowledge and of ignorance; and make me worthy to partake without condemnation of thine immaculate Mysteries, unto remission of my sins and unto life everlasting. Amen. Of thy Mystic Supper, O Son of God, accept me today as a communicant; for I will not speak of thy Mystery to thine enemies, neither will I give thee a kiss as did Judas; but like the thief will I confess thee: Remember me, O Lord, in thy Kingdom. Not unto judgment nor unto condemnation be my partaking of thy Holy Mysteries, O Lord, but unto the healing of soul and body.
showing 10 of 14 comments
@cocoschoppenboer: you're acting like all the 20+yos don't also do this
@weakspaget: isn't he almost 20?
@Beauregard: iirc he just recently turned 18
gemmy
also i see that cobson's pacifier is over gapejak's head even though hes far away you lazy noon fug you fuggen jerdee
Noooooooo! QOUTE BANNED ME AND NOW I HAVE TO GO OUTSIDE INSTEAD OF SPAMMING ON THE RU ALL DAY NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
@Chud: no arrow
why is xhe slim
@Argentinian_Chud: xhe took ozempic
showing 10 of 11 comments