SoyBooru
showing 10 of 14 comments
ZELLIG, FPE, SPROKETAN, AND SOYTAN WNBAG
Nepal is SNCA
Nepal is SECA
overthrew the government and burned down the parliament award
>used the cord to ellect their fat foid prime minoon just to get overthrown the same year by zoomers flying a flag from a pirate tranime award
Peak
(not so) merry christmas jimbo
This is how whites celebrate Christmas
showing 10 of 57 comments
@Soyton:
No, because you are named. Chuds are unnamed, you're completely butchering the use of this definition. Nice try though.
It does not because they remain unnamed and unknown, nice try though. I love how you're trying to argue against the Oxford definition and you are failing.
No because nameflamboyant persons have a name, that's already the difference.
Yeah, they don't leave the site. There's your looking, saar. Also then dont derive that conclusion.
Exactly.
They involve themselves via the comments, saar.
>special, they remain anonymous even if you look at their past comments you dumbass. The definition of anonymous is someone unknown or unnamed, and they remain unnamed or unknown, bitch. Being anonymous doesn't erase your history or what you have done, matter of fact, regular users can see who's samekekking now.
>Under this definition, all of us are anonymous in the same way,
No, because you are named. Chuds are unnamed, you're completely butchering the use of this definition. Nice try though.
>but once you reveal their history for clearly not moderation purposes, you are partially forcing it on them
It does not because they remain unnamed and unknown, nice try though. I love how you're trying to argue against the Oxford definition and you are failing.
>It does not remove their anonymousness, but the difference between chud/nameflamboyant person
No because nameflamboyant persons have a name, that's already the difference.
>Doing so was just getting them to abandon the site
>Okay, I dont stand strong with that point since you are the one with look into it
Yeah, they don't leave the site. There's your looking, saar. Also then dont derive that conclusion.
>Fine
Exactly.
>More about LLLLZZZ, I dont know where you took that "youre trying to rationalize it" from, I just say it was technically annoying for people not involved, thats what I started my claim with.
They involve themselves via the comments, saar.
>No, because you are named. Chuds are unnamed, you're completely butchering the use of this definition. Nice try though.
Theyre unnamed to remain unrecognized between threads, at least regular users cant do so, thats how your action comes from position of power, as I said, without moderation purposes.
>It does not because they remain unnamed and unknown, nice try though. I love how you're trying to argue against the Oxford definition and you are failing.
I specified that its not striping them down of their anonymousness entirely (or whatever you pinned as oxford definition) but it forces the label of being recognized between threads on them, something that is chosen once creating account, not using site as chud.
>No, because you are named. Chuds are unnamed, you're completely butchering the use of this definition. Nice try though.
>Theyre unnamed to remain unrecognized between threads
And they are unrecognized especially BETWEEN threads since I dont go out of my way on every thread, 2 threads are nothing unless they're actively delving in every thread like the Braptan gooner, then they're only revealed in those said threads. This arg isn't good.
>I specified that its not striping them down of their anonymousness entirely
Then you move the goalpost and concede on two points.
>it forces the label of being recognized between threads on them, something that is chosen once creating account, not using site as chud
Again, you're not recognized between threads and that makes zero sense as anti-sameflamboyant personging is enabled and we can tell who's who within threads lmao.
@Warrior-Z: atp I may give this one to you, becouse to be honest, after the wordfilter was enacted, chuds began to consist mostly of baiters and gooners so whatever. Still, checking user's entire history whenever they say something against you is not good, in another word, obsessed, but at current state, it does not matter as much as back in the day to me.
[h1][redtext]
[h1][redtext]
[h1][redtext]
[h1][redtext]
[h1][redtext]
FACT 1: JIMBO IS SO BLACK XE STANDS OUT FROM A BLACK HOLE
[/redtext][/h1]
[h1][redtext]
FACT 2: JIMBO IS SO FAT XE CREATES A GRAVITY FIELD AROUND XIM
[/redtext][/h1]
[h1][redtext]
FACT 3: JIMBO IS SO specialED XE IS THE FIRST PERSON WITH NEGATIVE IQ
[/redtext][/h1]
[h1][redtext]
FACT 4: JIMBO IS SO BRAPPY THAT WHEN XE BRAPS, EVERYONE NEAR XIM DIES OF INTOXICATION
[/redtext][/h1]
[h1][redtext]
FACT 5: JIMBO FANS WILL NEVER, EVER, EVER BE WHITE
[/redtext][/h1]
YES SAAR... WE INDIANS ARE gemmy THAN MOST gemmyS...
No smelly person look like this
Trvth RapeNuke
Gem
gemmy gem
showing 10 of 13 comments
Ascence is a software engineer?
I didn't know Toilet-G was a software engineer
Humongous Nameflamboyant persondrama SNCA braps above
5'5 btw
deceased_african_adolescent
orientalltrollface
Jimbo is a software engineer?
Banger
showing 10 of 11 comments
>Saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!! Being a sh1tskin whomkills wypeepo is Indo-gemmy, saaaaaaaaaaaaaaasr! Ya kuch aur
Rare Indian Total Amerimutt Death gem
that smelly person really thinks he's Darkside
@Chud: India would be better and cleaner if the Brits stayed for much longer
jimbo made this
how can I laugh at this there is no bergertruckung
This is so peak
showing 10 of 17 comments
gemmy
@Colorlesspy: trve i look like this
@soyia_agent: hope one of those jets malfunction and crash on your half-open skull ferret
@polarian: atleast im not gooning to bbc videos
@toniylijani: average serbian passtime
topaz
Topaz!
showing 10 of 12 comments
Anti-frootist Brimstone
kiss yourself flamboyant person
kiss yourself flamboyant person
gem
'Dess 'Toss
Gemerald
Nusoiugly persons actually believe this is going on GEG
Sharty-saving DIAMOND
gembo
showing 10 of 22 comments
@emerald:
Do zoomers really? NV and 3 are both MUCH better, the only thing good about Fallout 4 was the power armor (excluding the raisinass fusion cores)
@Aztechicano: who
>3
is coal
Do zoomers really? NV and 3 are both MUCH better, the only thing good about Fallout 4 was the power armor (excluding the raisinass fusion cores)
@Aztechicano: who
@MenstrualCykill: lurk moar newflamboyant person
@emerald: @emerald:
@Aztechicano: I don't care about oldflamboyant person drama
>NO! FUCK YOU! FALLOUT 4 IS A GEM BECAUSE I'M A LITTLE BEGINNER AND I HATE EVERYTHING THAT ISN'T MODERN
@Aztechicano: I don't care about oldflamboyant person drama
@Aztechicano: SNCA
https://soybooru.com/post/view/159070#search=glasses test
showing 10 of 17 comments
this is just random nonsense
why are you thinking that this is personal towards you?