You are a vocal minority. Despite everything Vaush has been through, he's as relevant as ever.
Nobody will subscribe to your explicitly extremist political ideology, no matter how hard you try. You're on the wrong side of history.
Vaush won.
@OrientalTrollface: I don't.
Look at Vaush's channel right now. People are still watching him. Still subscribing to him. Still donating to him.
He's on the right side of history, you're not. As shrimple as that.
If you want to brainwash someone, maybe don't use nazis as a moral compass as anyone over the age of 5 have heard they'd been up to no good.
@Chud:
okay, does this argument apply to failed painter from Austria who had millions of followers, supporters, numerous support and donations, and had a whole country supporting being annexed by him? or does this only apply to leftists?
@OrientalTrollface: >equates to failed painter from Austria immediately
You're desperate, aren't you? Alas, it's a false equivalence. For starters, failed painter from Austria lost the war and an hero'd shortly afterwards. Meanwhile Vaush? Is still alive. And I don't think having a few weird off-putting fetishes is as nearly evil as the multitude of war crimes the Nazi Germany had done.
>yeah, all he's doing is a lazy ad populum fallacy
Assording to your logic, you're supposed to answer "yes" because that was the only information I supplied you with and talking about things he did outside of what I was talking about counts as "losing".
My whole argument was as simple as 2 plus 2 - Vaush was only able to gather the audience this big because he was on a right side of history. Everybody knows USSR defeated the Nazi Germany, thus cementing them as "good guys". You trying to bring up Hilter into this while being explicitly told this isn't the case here is silly.
>but from the perspective of a far right leader
I already explained to you why comparing failed painter from Austria to Vaush is wrong.
@Chud:
Far right leaders and influencers also garner big audiences, it isn't because they are on the "right side of history" that vausch is famous, specialGOD...
@OrientalTrollface: Okay? You're the only one who kept trying to bring up far right people here so I hope you're satisfied. Btw, if it isn't because of the "right side of history", then why? Explain.
@OrientalTrollface: You didn't explain why both left and right indiscriminately gain support of people. You just stated your preferable political outcome.
@Chud: of course he hates it because a Chud NKVD officer would've killed him. Hell most of breadtube would've been disposed of by chuds in either a fascist, communist, socialist dictatorship because they are useless. Only a liberal democracy could all such people to exist
Nobody will subscribe to your explicitly extremist political ideology, no matter how hard you try. You're on the wrong side of history.
Vaush won.
Look at Vaush's channel right now. People are still watching him. Still subscribing to him. Still donating to him.
He's on the right side of history, you're not. As shrimple as that.
If you want to brainwash someone, maybe don't use nazis as a moral compass as anyone over the age of 5 have heard they'd been up to no good.
okay, does this argument apply to failed painter from Austria who had millions of followers, supporters, numerous support and donations, and had a whole country supporting being annexed by him? or does this only apply to leftists?
You're desperate, aren't you? Alas, it's a false equivalence. For starters, failed painter from Austria lost the war and an hero'd shortly afterwards. Meanwhile Vaush? Is still alive. And I don't think having a few weird off-putting fetishes is as nearly evil as the multitude of war crimes the Nazi Germany had done.
* Face palm *
Commienoons lost, get over it
Your argument is a fallacy, see above.
Was failed painter from Austria a good guy because he loved his puppy very dearly?
it uses your exact argument but from the perspective of a far right leader, if mine is fallacy yours is aswell.
Fallacy argument, still isn't dismantling my primary argument.
My whole argument was as simple as 2 plus 2 - Vaush was only able to gather the audience this big because he was on a right side of history. Everybody knows USSR defeated the Nazi Germany, thus cementing them as "good guys". You trying to bring up Hilter into this while being explicitly told this isn't the case here is silly.
I already explained to you why comparing failed painter from Austria to Vaush is wrong.
Fallacy argument.
Far right leaders and influencers also garner big audiences, it isn't because they are on the "right side of history" that vausch is famous, specialGOD...
Successful nations: Far Right politics is a staple in its governnace
Failed regimes: Far Left politics is a staple in its governance
Same with the Holohoax.