chudnater2: chuvash are the only true white turks although a lot of volga tatars do appear to be pvre Indo-Aryans (they still arent IMO)

Chud¹: @chudnater2: Volga tatars have higher european dna on average than chuvash if you look at PCAs with both

chudnater2: @Chud: no? both are relatively similar albeit volga tatars have slightly more mongol DNA due to the Volga region being setteled by mongols. Chuvash are the pure descendants of Volga Bulgarians (a finno-turkic people) that fled into the forests after the mongols killed 80% of the western steppe. Both have a lot of white features, it's just that volga tatars have more mongol heritage

Chud²⁽¹⁾: @chudnater2: There is no pure population in the volga region, each are a mix of bulgars/scythians/finnics/slavs etc in varying proportions. Volga have trace mongol ancestry yes, but it's counteracted by a greater degree of scythian ancestry that results in a more european profile overall. On vahaduo models volgas score ~19% east eurasian while chuvashes score ~23%

Astrofene: Falseflagged again award

JD_VANCE:

>It's da falseflaaaaaaaag or something

Chud³: @chudnater2: @Chud: oh my god no one fucking cares. this is why no one likes race autists, I'm convinced this raisin is just a cope for people too specialed to ever make anything of their own lives so they have nothing to be proud of other than the fact that their 2856th great grandfather raped a village in Central Asia thousands of years ago

Astrofene: kill all falseflagging noons.

Chud⁴⁽¹⁾: @CrimeanChud: Churka raisinskin cope

Chud⁵:

>Everyone is a churkan or however the homosexual ass post-modern marxist commie gangster neologism

Sectionalism: @chudnater2: Gagauz are White. And Rumelian Turks are probably more European than the Chuvash. I think Volga Tatars are so more European than Chuvash but I don't remember