>amerifarts love infantilizing young adults. Can be observed everywhere. HS graduation at 18, can’t drink until 21, anyone under 18 is a “literal child,” etc.<\/span>
Fact. On one of my posts some nigger made the case for why relationships between 17 and 23 year olds are fine if there's consent, then an Amerimutt condemned him, but responded with "The AoC should be 25".
I'm anti-pedophile and I'm not for 60 year olds raping 13 year old girls because "mashallah at 13 they are fertile so zey're wumen" like some goatfucker Muslim, but holy shit, 25 is too late. 18's fine for the most part.
You're much more competent at 18 than 13, and if you want to pull out the "they're still not developed enough and they end up being promiscuous" argument, then my response is that that behavior is just a moral failing you can cope with by having a moral compass (or just being a 'teen), or by just having a different environment. Just teach them not to fuck anybody they see and you'll be good.
However i know that 18 is not when the brain is fully developed, so I'd be against big age gaps until 25. Not even 18 and 30 is fine. Those relationships end up being really manipulative for the most part, especially shit like 50 year old (((producers))) fucking their 22 year old actresses and avoiding the slammer by getting their date to lie about consent and the cops going "well it wasn't a kid".
Countries that are crazy enough to have an under 18 AoC have these things called Romeo and Juliet laws, where from the under-18 AoC to 18, you can't be in a relationship with anybody more than 2 years younger or older than you (>or some other number of years like that :mutt:<\/span>).
I suggest the AoC being 18 globally, but with Romeo and Juliet laws until 25 where relationships outside of the 18-25 window for people in it are forbidden. You can't fuck 13 year olds as an 18 year old, and you can't get fucked by 40 year olds as a 22 year old. Then after 25 anybody 25 or older is fair game.

Tags

Comments(29)