Chud¹: me in the middle

Chud²: if this was a captcha, it would be "select all women below"

Chud³: I use arch and I do look like this

Chud⁴: me on every frame

BWCGODXXX: made for tbp only

Chud⁵: Windows won

Chud⁶: Windows lost

ShadowMario: very funny

Chud⁷: Allow me to add to this, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation. Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ. One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS

more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff

including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you? (An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example. Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn't the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you've heard this one before. Get used to it. You'll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it. You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn't more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn't perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument. Last, I'd like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn't be fighting among ourselves over naming other people's software. But what the heck, I'm in a bad mood now. I think I'm feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn't you and everyone refer to GCC as 'the Linux compiler'? Or at least, 'Linux GCC'? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD? If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this: Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux' huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don't be a nag. Thanks for listening.

Chud⁸⁽⁷⁾:

>you VILL use ze heccin' linuxerino and other special raisin and cripple your computers capabilities just to not get spyed on and data mines by corpos (you still are just by random flamboyant person that sells you to chinks) because uhhh it's le heccin' Independent system """free""" of data stealing and it's totally NOT supported by brainlet ugly people!Post #7633

Chud⁹⁽⁵⁾: @Chud:

MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS MEDS

Chud¹⁰: trans people won.

DolI: @Chud: based

Chud¹¹: @DolI: you are NOT doll

Chud¹²: chino lovers and satania lovers have completely different mindset albeit

Chud¹³⁽⁵⁾: Gem

Chud¹⁴⁽¹²⁾: is that a transbian flag on gemson's shirt

Chud¹⁵: 😎 I'd just like to interject for a moment.

What you're refering to as my cock, is in fact, my cock and balls, or as I've recently taken to calling it, cock plus balls. The penis is not a genitourinary system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning set of reproductive organs made useful by the testicles, prostate and vital system components comprising a full reproductive system as defined in The Bible.

Many cock users run a modified version of the reproductive system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of my dick which is widely used today is often called 'tiny', and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the greatest thing since sliced bread, developed by God himself.

There really is a penis, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. My schlong is the intromittent organ: the part of the system that allocates the cum. The cock is an essential part of a reproductive system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete reproductive system. Cock is normally used in combination with the balls: the whole system is basically balls with cock added, or cock/balls. All the so-called cock distributions are really distributions of cock/balls!

Chud¹⁶: *average linux user

Chud¹⁷: anti linux coal

Chud¹⁸: Trans won. Linux won. America won.

Chud¹⁹: anti ugly personux gemerald

vicky: Ｏ　Ｂ　Ｓ　Ｅ　Ｓ　Ｓ　Ｅ　Ｄ

TheGemCritic: 4chan admin team

Chud²⁰: Was ist das.