Chud¹: Marge

Chud²: gem

Chud³⁽²⁾: Nique t.a.on m.p.ere !!
Soyons inclusifs, mais pas pour les aveugles et les dyslexiques. On les emmerdes, littéralement.

Chud⁴: Je vois que les clés s'approprient le site

Chud⁵: j' <3 negre

Chud⁶: 'm >4 nigri

Chud⁷: Not French, context? Did the Academie française do something based?

Chud⁸⁽²⁾: @Chud: First you need to know that the "Académie Française" is what establishes in french language different rules, to perfect the french in a lot of aspects essentially.
The character of the left is typical leftist that absolutely want people to write in a specialed way to make people "feel included" (mainly women IMHO), all because masculine is the default gender in french (unlike the german one which is feminine first).

This principle of "écriture inclusive" (or simply : "Inclusive writing") already existed in french, but using parenthesis, instead of the points between each words like so : "Cher·e·s lecteur·rice·s", while the original way is written like so : "Cher(e)s lecteur(ice)s".

They basically feel offended that you're put between parenthesis, yet, they were already included, it's already something nice to do. So the "Académie Française" just said no, it makes the language ugly and unreadable, thus, leftist consider the Académie to be filled with old chuds, you know, the typical leftist complotist theories that are never questionned.

They can eventually be so specialed that they write words that cannot be gendered, with a ".e" at the end, "just in case".

I however don't know why there's Touhou character features (Junko and Reisen), go figure.

Chud⁹: Both handmade for BBC

Chud¹⁰:

Chud¹¹⁽¹⁰⁾:

>Both handmade for BBC

Chud¹²: @Chud: Bravo. Wise words. Some Leftists really want to complicate language in horrendous ways.