Wishuponasoy<\/span>↗<\/a><\/div>
Chud<\/span>↗<\/a><\/div>
Cobson was used for self-inserts and posivtive depictions of characters but now can be used to mock BBC fags<\/div><\/blockquote>
Chud<\/span>↗<\/a><\/div>
Wishuponasoy<\/span>↗<\/a><\/div>
Babyjak was always established as a baby since the beginning. If you want to mock age regressors, use some other template (subvariant:pissbaby exists, for example, which doesn't have association with real babies but rather with retarded manchildren)<\/div><\/blockquote>Variant soyak was only supposed to mock soyboys when it was made, but now has multiple usage cases<\/div><\/blockquote>Yes, the meanings of some variants or subvariants can change, but that's because they're more general. For example, nobody uses slopjaks or tranny depictions as self-inserts, because they're more specific and harder\/impossible to modify into something positive, because it already represents one thing: a jartycuck or a troon. Similar for babyjak: he specifically represents a baby<\/div><\/blockquote>The essence of all soyjaks is to mock soyboys, therefore a positive to negative evolution is the most likely outcome (like what happened with babyjak this year)
Wishuponasoy<\/span>↗<\/a><\/div>
Chud<\/span>↗<\/a><\/div>
Wishuponasoy<\/span>↗<\/a><\/div>
False, he was traced from the Guiness World Record for gape (same person as Gapejak) and was not originally used to depict troons, it's just that depictions of trannies with this variant became more popular <\/div><\/blockquote>Gapejak was the positive version of bernd, Bernd was used negatively before, while gapejak was used positively<\/div><\/blockquote>Gapejak was also used negatively, and Bernd was also used positively (think about OMGSISA for example)<\/div><\/blockquote>The omgsisa bernd ones came after bernd and could be used to mock soyboys that are simps, as for gapejak he wasn't that negative in the start apart from the big gape version, but we found other ways to use him to mock soyboys

Tags

Comments(36)