Source
No source
Rating
Safe
Comments(104)
Log in to comment
GEEEEEEEG
>A. Wyatt Man
No...the guy who drew happy merchant would never do that
No...the guy who drew happy merchant would never do that
Gem even doe Anime Was invented by JapanARYANS Not Americunts
He did tho. Gramp's country went into steep demographic decline upon "winning", and now even his grandson is a mutt
It's only a "decline" in the eyes of Nazis, coincidentally the same people who lost 🤣He did tho. Gramp's country went into steep demographic decline upon "winning", and now even his grandson is a mutt
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberatePopulations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
Inb4 fashie cope
On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementThis is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Errata: aboriginal estonian population
@Olgol Reply NOW
Yeah which was my point dipshit. There is no insidious plot to destroy the white race. Any reported "destruction" is likely unintentional.On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementShow quoted text
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Also, white people aren't "aboriginals" in the US. They were actually invaders. Shows how retarded crackers like you are
Addendum: discard the last paragraph
I explicitly mentioned Estonia as an example not the US and using the US as an example is even worse for you, the repealing of the Reed-Johnson act which restricted immigration to the british isles and assorted NW european countries was deliberately pushed by "anti-racist" as is well documented in the Culture of Critique. They argued that it wouldnt "upset the makeup of the nation" which was a clear lie. 60 years later and american nordids are approaching a minority in their own nation when they made up close to 90% of the population.Yeah which was my point dipshit. There is no insidious plot to destroy the white race. Any reported "destruction" is likely unintentional.Show quoted text
On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementShow quoted text
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Also, white people aren't "aboriginals" in the US. They were actually invaders. Shows how retarded crackers like you are
Addendum: discard the last paragraph
Also, read Madison Grant nusoi
**anti-racists
>The Culture of CritiqueI explicitly mentioned Estonia as an example not the US and using the US as an example is even worse for you, the repealing of the Reed-Johnson act which restricted immigration to the british isles and assorted NW european countries was deliberately pushed by "anti-racist" as is well documented in the Culture of Critique. They argued that it wouldnt "upset the makeup of the nation" which was a clear lie. 60 years later and american nordids are approaching a minority in their own nation when they made up close to 90% of the population.Show quoted text
Yeah which was my point dipshit. There is no insidious plot to destroy the white race. Any reported "destruction" is likely unintentional.Show quoted text
On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementShow quoted text
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Also, white people aren't "aboriginals" in the US. They were actually invaders. Shows how retarded crackers like you are
Addendum: discard the last paragraph
Not a serious scholarly work, you know? Of course your sources are other dumb conspiritards. The guy who wrote it is a psychologist who thinks he is an appropriate authority figure to speak on topics beyond his expertise. Literal crank work
Read Stephen J Gould's "The Mismeasure of Man", he provides a surface level but engaging refutation of "scientific" racism.Also, read Madison Grant nusoi
Not an argument, are you genuinely incapable or approaching material and forming your own opinion? You probably study some snca education like pharmacology instead of something aryan like mechanical/electrical engineering.>The Culture of CritiqueShow quoted text
I explicitly mentioned Estonia as an example not the US and using the US as an example is even worse for you, the repealing of the Reed-Johnson act which restricted immigration to the british isles and assorted NW european countries was deliberately pushed by "anti-racist" as is well documented in the Culture of Critique. They argued that it wouldnt "upset the makeup of the nation" which was a clear lie. 60 years later and american nordids are approaching a minority in their own nation when they made up close to 90% of the population.Show quoted text
Yeah which was my point dipshit. There is no insidious plot to destroy the white race. Any reported "destruction" is likely unintentional.Show quoted text
On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementShow quoted text
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Also, white people aren't "aboriginals" in the US. They were actually invaders. Shows how retarded crackers like you are
Addendum: discard the last paragraph
Not a serious scholarly work, you know? Of course your sources are other dumb conspiritards. The guy who wrote it is a psychologist who thinks he is an appropriate authority figure to speak on topics beyond his expertise. Literal crank work
You are a slave and I am your master, today, tomorrow and forever.
Are you a psychic? You nailed my area of interest pretty accurately...Not an argument, are you genuinely incapable or approaching material and forming your own opinion? You probably study some snca education like pharmacology instead of something aryan like mechanical/electrical engineering.Show quoted text
>The Culture of CritiqueShow quoted text
I explicitly mentioned Estonia as an example not the US and using the US as an example is even worse for you, the repealing of the Reed-Johnson act which restricted immigration to the british isles and assorted NW european countries was deliberately pushed by "anti-racist" as is well documented in the Culture of Critique. They argued that it wouldnt "upset the makeup of the nation" which was a clear lie. 60 years later and american nordids are approaching a minority in their own nation when they made up close to 90% of the population.Show quoted text
Yeah which was my point dipshit. There is no insidious plot to destroy the white race. Any reported "destruction" is likely unintentional.Show quoted text
On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementShow quoted text
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Also, white people aren't "aboriginals" in the US. They were actually invaders. Shows how retarded crackers like you are
Addendum: discard the last paragraph
Not a serious scholarly work, you know? Of course your sources are other dumb conspiritards. The guy who wrote it is a psychologist who thinks he is an appropriate authority figure to speak on topics beyond his expertise. Literal crank work
You are a slave and I am your master, today, tomorrow and forever.
Regardless, no I'm not, and Kevin MacDonald isn't qualified as a historian
^lost the debate like a retard and is embarrassed award
Gem, what is this Amermutt doing?
Funny, considering that the guy used a non academic source for his argument.^lost the debate like a retard and is embarrassed award
every ww2 veterans thats getting abused by a ghetto black woman at a retirement home
Do you have any actual refutations of his claims beyond saying "he's a psychologist"? Did he make any errors or did he manipulate his sources? If you're interest in an actual critique/debunking of his work I would highly recommend the exchange between him and Cofnas, you can find their papers and articles here:Are you a psychic? You nailed my area of interest pretty accurately...Show quoted text
Not an argument, are you genuinely incapable or approaching material and forming your own opinion? You probably study some snca education like pharmacology instead of something aryan like mechanical/electrical engineering.Show quoted text
>The Culture of CritiqueShow quoted text
I explicitly mentioned Estonia as an example not the US and using the US as an example is even worse for you, the repealing of the Reed-Johnson act which restricted immigration to the british isles and assorted NW european countries was deliberately pushed by "anti-racist" as is well documented in the Culture of Critique. They argued that it wouldnt "upset the makeup of the nation" which was a clear lie. 60 years later and american nordids are approaching a minority in their own nation when they made up close to 90% of the population.Show quoted text
Yeah which was my point dipshit. There is no insidious plot to destroy the white race. Any reported "destruction" is likely unintentional.Show quoted text
On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementShow quoted text
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Also, white people aren't "aboriginals" in the US. They were actually invaders. Shows how retarded crackers like you are
Addendum: discard the last paragraph
Not a serious scholarly work, you know? Of course your sources are other dumb conspiritards. The guy who wrote it is a psychologist who thinks he is an appropriate authority figure to speak on topics beyond his expertise. Literal crank work
You are a slave and I am your master, today, tomorrow and forever.
Regardless, no I'm not, and Kevin MacDonald isn't qualified as a historian
https://nathancofnas.com/debate-with-kevin-macdonald/
But respectfully Olgol, do you have any actual refutations? You ignored me citing a wikileaks document, you ignored me citing a UN document. I'm sorry, but your argumentation style just seems to be ignoring all the main points and focusing on minor flaws (I left out Estonia then corrected myself, etc).
**interested
It is certainly an academic works, his previous two books on judaism were highly regarded and praised by jewish groups, but when he argued that judaism is a group evolutionary strategy they suddenly soured.It's not academic. Thats just a fact
Also, since you complained about non-academic sources, note the peer-reviewed articles in journals I linked in the exchange between them in extremely high impact journals.Do you have any actual refutations of his claims beyond saying "he's a psychologist"? Did he make any errors or did he manipulate his sources? If you're interest in an actual critique/debunking of his work I would highly recommend the exchange between him and Cofnas, you can find their papers and articles here:Show quoted text
Are you a psychic? You nailed my area of interest pretty accurately...Show quoted text
Not an argument, are you genuinely incapable or approaching material and forming your own opinion? You probably study some snca education like pharmacology instead of something aryan like mechanical/electrical engineering.Show quoted text
>The Culture of CritiqueShow quoted text
I explicitly mentioned Estonia as an example not the US and using the US as an example is even worse for you, the repealing of the Reed-Johnson act which restricted immigration to the british isles and assorted NW european countries was deliberately pushed by "anti-racist" as is well documented in the Culture of Critique. They argued that it wouldnt "upset the makeup of the nation" which was a clear lie. 60 years later and american nordids are approaching a minority in their own nation when they made up close to 90% of the population.Show quoted text
Yeah which was my point dipshit. There is no insidious plot to destroy the white race. Any reported "destruction" is likely unintentional.Show quoted text
On the contrary it largely discuses immigration from underdeveloped nations into developed nations. The result, not the intention is what matters, however, there has been genuine lobbying to convince europeans of the "benefits of diversity" as was shown by a wikileaks document where the US invested heavily into convincing the aboriginal population into accepting their replacementShow quoted text
This is just importing more people to offset low fertility in countries. This has nothing to do with deliberately replacing white people. If there are white immigrants willing to live in a country, it's fair game.Show quoted text
>Only a cracker like you would think it's deliberateShow quoted text
Populations change, and only a dumb cracker European like you would think it's deliberate replacement.Show quoted text
Meanwhile, le un:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
Your little gotcha has been refuted.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06TALLINN578_a.html
Also, white people aren't "aboriginals" in the US. They were actually invaders. Shows how retarded crackers like you are
Addendum: discard the last paragraph
Not a serious scholarly work, you know? Of course your sources are other dumb conspiritards. The guy who wrote it is a psychologist who thinks he is an appropriate authority figure to speak on topics beyond his expertise. Literal crank work
You are a slave and I am your master, today, tomorrow and forever.
Regardless, no I'm not, and Kevin MacDonald isn't qualified as a historian
https://nathancofnas.com/debate-with-kevin-macdonald/
But respectfully Olgol, do you have any actual refutations? You ignored me citing a wikileaks document, you ignored me citing a UN document. I'm sorry, but your argumentation style just seems to be ignoring all the main points and focusing on minor flaws (I left out Estonia then corrected myself, etc).
@Olgol
Jem
Steven Jay Gould doesn't refute any of the central claims of racialism and commited massive fraud by lying about Morton's skulls, a later reinvestigation found that Morton's numbers on cranial volume were right. Not to mention the modern studeis confirming differences in brain size between racesRead Stephen J Gould's "The Mismeasure of Man", he provides a surface level but engaging refutation of "scientific" racism.Show quoted text
Also, read Madison Grant nusoi
His methods were unscientific, he already had presassumptions and did politically motivated research.Steven Jay Gould doesn't refute any of the central claims of racialism and commited massive fraud by lying about Morton's skulls, a later reinvestigation found that Morton's numbers on cranial volume were right. Not to mention the modern studeis confirming differences in brain size between races
Yes, also there are genuine differences, australian aboriginees have brain sizes of 1200 cc, as opposed to nnordids with an average of about 1450-1480 cc.His methods were unscientific, he already had presassumptions and did politically motivated research.Show quoted text
Steven Jay Gould doesn't refute any of the central claims of racialism and commited massive fraud by lying about Morton's skulls, a later reinvestigation found that Morton's numbers on cranial volume were right. Not to mention the modern studeis confirming differences in brain size between races
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1261675/
For cacas who dont know how to use scihub:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/jul/27/higher-latitudes-bigger-eyes-brains
**nordids
Olgol the pseudo-intellectual SLAVE gypsy got BTFO'D BY SVVEDGQD KEEEEEEEEEK
Yeah no shit, at the time that was a pretty good refutation. It's why I said "surface level". Sasha Gusev is the best imoSteven Jay Gould doesn't refute any of the central claims of racialism and commited massive fraud by lying about Morton's skulls, a later reinvestigation found that Morton's numbers on cranial volume were right. Not to mention the modern studeis confirming differences in brain size between racesShow quoted text
Read Stephen J Gould's "The Mismeasure of Man", he provides a surface level but engaging refutation of "scientific" racism.Show quoted text
Also, read Madison Grant nusoi
Blud described all racialistsHis methods were unscientific, he already had presassumptions and did politically motivated research.Show quoted text
Steven Jay Gould doesn't refute any of the central claims of racialism and commited massive fraud by lying about Morton's skulls, a later reinvestigation found that Morton's numbers on cranial volume were right. Not to mention the modern studeis confirming differences in brain size between races
No I was not. I was just busy. I'll make sure to return to this thread to BTFO some crackersOlgol the pseudo-intellectual SLAVE gypsy got BTFO'D BY SVVEDGQD KEEEEEEEEEK
Nobody is denying this, people are just denying skull size having any statistically significant effect on IQYes, also there are genuine differences, australian aboriginees have brain sizes of 1200 cc, as opposed to nnordids with an average of about 1450-1480 cc.Show quoted text
His methods were unscientific, he already had presassumptions and did politically motivated research.Show quoted text
Steven Jay Gould doesn't refute any of the central claims of racialism and commited massive fraud by lying about Morton's skulls, a later reinvestigation found that Morton's numbers on cranial volume were right. Not to mention the modern studeis confirming differences in brain size between races
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1261675/
For cacas who dont know how to use scihub:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/jul/27/higher-latitudes-bigger-eyes-brains
Cracker = white person that I don't like
Nigger = same thing but black
Cope more
BACKTRACKINGCracker = white person that I don't likeShow quoted text
Nigger = same thing but black
Cope more
You're delusionalBACKTRACKINGShow quoted text
Cracker = white person that I don't likeShow quoted text
Nigger = same thing but black
Cope more
backpedaling piece of shit, shitskin confirmedYou're delusionalShow quoted text
BACKTRACKINGShow quoted text
Cracker = white person that I don't likeShow quoted text
Nigger = same thing but black
Cope more
Also whether Gould "lied" is up for debate. Of course you're a race realist so you need to stack up points against your opposition.Steven Jay Gould doesn't refute any of the central claims of racialism and commited massive fraud by lying about Morton's skulls, a later reinvestigation found that Morton's numbers on cranial volume were right. Not to mention the modern studeis confirming differences in brain size between racesShow quoted text
Read Stephen J Gould's "The Mismeasure of Man", he provides a surface level but engaging refutation of "scientific" racism.Show quoted text
Also, read Madison Grant nusoi
You, like Gold and the other guy are simply inferior to me. Cry about itbackpedaling piece of shit, shitskin confirmedShow quoted text
You're delusionalShow quoted text
BACKTRACKINGShow quoted text
Cracker = white person that I don't likeShow quoted text
Nigger = same thing but black
Cope more
ONWO gem
Log in to comment