AccountPostsCommentsHelpSystemTagsSoyBooru Guidesoyjak.party
AllMy FavoritesPopular PostsPopular by DayPopular by MonthPopular by YearRandom Post
Blotter updated: 02/05/26 Show/Hide Show All

IP 216.73.216.180 has been banned until the end of time because of VPN Detected

If you couldn't possibly be guilty of what you're banned for, the person we banned probably had a dynamic IP address and so do you. Please email mustard@soyjak.st or post in the /q/ thread.

See http://whatismyipaddress.com/dynamic-static for more information.

Contact the staff (be sure to include this message)

Advertisement
Image
main image
Uploader Jones, avatar
Tags booru dan gigachad meta:tagme nas:gigachad nate subvariant:female_cobson subvariant:perceptive_chud that_one_fucking_picture_of_nate_being_a_smug_little_bastard variant:chudjak variant:cobson variant:soyak
Source
Locked No
Rating IAS
Prev | Index | Next
Comments
avatar Olgol - Reply
The gigachads still got brown hands tho
avatar Chud1 - Reply
Two ogols in the first panel
avatar Jones - Reply
@Olgol: wow, why did you notice this? do you want to suck their BBCs?
avatar Chud2 - Reply
Why are they all Ogol-skinned?
avatar GarryNealson - Reply
Why are they all [nameflamboyant person I don't like] skinned?
avatar Coemskong - Reply
Evil cannot create new things, only subvert what has already been done.
avatar Jones - Reply
@Coemskong: yeah, slopjaks are evil as they are simply deformed versions of existing gemmy variants. femjaks are the way to go as they require skill and dedication to create.
avatar Coemskong - Reply
@Jones:
>Muh femjaks are skill needed


Don't make me laugh bruh
avatar Chud3 - Reply
@Chud: @Chud: @Jones: ack black_hair bloodshot_eyes crying fascism flag:nazi_germany gigachad hanging holding_mirror mirror mustache nazism red_shirt rope subvariant:patrick swastika teeth tongue variant:chudjak
avatar Jones - Reply
@Coemskong: are you specialed? do i have to put /s after every sentence?
avatar JimboClittyLeakageArchive - Reply
2 jimbos top panel
avatar Chud4 - Reply
@Coemskong: This similar to St Thomas' conception of evil as outlined in Summa Theologiae.
Basically he viewed evil as not something existing itself independently, rather he viewed evil as a privation of good. This would imply that evil has no nature of its own, and that it's only nature is lack of nature.
This sums it up well
"That which is good, is;that which is evil, isn't"
Commenting
Comment Formatting Options
Want to report a comment? Report the post itself with relevant details.
Advertisement