02/13/26 - How it works, controversial sorting: Posts are ranked by Total Activity (most votes) once they reach a 5-vote minimum. To qualify as "Controversial," a post must have a split between 45% and 65% for either Upvotes or Downvotes.
02/13/26 -
★
(You) need to save our The Democracy. (You)r votes are now more powerful.
★
02/11/26 - DID YOU KNOW THAT: white_background, transparent_background, drawn_background, irl_background etc are good tags?
02/05/26 - Reporting now uses a drop-down menu instead of a blank field. Please familiarize yourself with it.
02/02/26 - Approvers: Mentioning rule-breaking posts in the approval queue instead of silently letting them get deleted is grounds for a demotion.
@OrHoweverTheBurgerIsEaten: wtf? why ? so one guy , who was posting 'jaks on xhis account ,just chooses, somehow, at random, to upload child gore? how do you know ?
@MenstrualCykill: if you REALLY want to know, just ask a janny on the IRC. It doesn't always need to be public knowledge and have a drama train around it
@MenstrualCykill:
First off, no one even asked and he just went out of his way to say what he got banned for
Secondly, if someone asked he could've just said either "banned for gore" or "rule breaking posts" or nothing at all instead of blowing it out of proportion and being like "OYYYYYYYY DOCTOSSSSSS IT'S A GIRL TIED UP AND IT COULD BE CHILD ABUSE BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW HER AGE" or whatever
Exactly what he said.
Highly actual since it would've been uploaded if it was soyjak because "the archive must act like a archive* or however custard said it
just doing random weird raisin for no reason
I never said that
First off, no one even asked and he just went out of his way to say what he got banned for
Secondly, if someone asked he could've just said either "banned for gore" or "rule breaking posts" or nothing at all instead of blowing it out of proportion and being like "OYYYYYYYY DOCTOSSSSSS IT'S A GIRL TIED UP AND IT COULD BE CHILD ABUSE BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW HER AGE" or whatever