schizorald

cobbleugly personoon is built for BVC

@trevor: she's built for my bwc keep coping tiny vlod pecker

@KAYOS: twb*
VLODSON >>>

@KAYOS:

>wc

>b

oh, euroaches.............

Cobblestone please sit on me

@Chud: Kurdish request

@emerald: ^ angloraisin mindbroken by kurds

@trevor: Just say you hate white people

@emerald: why would I hate myself

@trevor: mindbroken by people who get genocided by iraqis lmao

@Chud: I'm Iraqi and Kurdish, wdym

@trevor: iranians and mongols

@trevor: iraqi and Kurdish
Claims to be white

@trevor: Europeans are white. Iraqis are not European. Henceforth, you're not white.

@Chud: just look up "Kurdish man" and you'd see a variety of skin colors ranging from pure white to olive

@trevor: zimplish

@trevor: All I see are raisinskins who believe in goat fucking and bombing. Nothing European about that.

@Chud: we won the crusades keep raging on us KEK!

@Chud: you think whiteness is when you're a ugly person diddyblud? Islam won

@Chud: Trevor famously loves transgenders, especially the brown pooner variety!

@Chud: How old were Muhammad's wives?

@Chud: the youngest was Aisha at 19

@trevor: Liberal revisionism. Ibn Sa'd's biography holds her age at the time of marriage as between six and seven

@Chud: trevor famously loves emeralds? especially the JClitty Tundra variety?

@Chud: Ibn Sa'd was an anti-muslim chad who worshipped muahwiyah and uthman, bringing up actual flamboyant people into this

@trevor: I would also be anti islam if i found out someones wife was 7 years old

@Chud: debunked
[url]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MiupfAM3Sb5GNC9HkP58MbhYUQe2JW38-W9QuZ9e2o8/edit?tab=t.0[url]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MiupfAM3Sb5GNC9HkP58MbhYUQe2JW38-W9QuZ9e2o8/edit?tab=t.0

@trevor: pisslam lost doey

@Chud: w concession

@trevor: This is gish gallop, ferret just cite what's in the document instead of sending a random link.

@Chud: your ADHD ass is too lazy to read the document?

@Chud: kafircel to illiterate to read is also too fat and lazy to press a link, news at 12

@trevor: I thought you're a explosive person

@trevor: 1. I'm not clicking a random link from you. 2. If you were so confident in what's in it, you'd be able to present that information to me without being a lazy gish galloping flamboyant personlord.

@Chud: I'm a Muslim, YOU'RE the one who conceded me winning the argument because you said "pisslam lost doey" after ignoring the document

@Chud: just admit you lost

@Chud: He's from the middle east and believes in Islam you really thought think he's white

@trevor: why can't you bring up anything that's in it geg

@Chud: special who can't read award

@trevor: Why are you arguing with nophonos

@trevor: you are just the muzzrat version of jimbo

@Chud: why cant you click a link and read, fatty?

@Chud: the document talks about the fallacies of Sahih al bukhari and uses a formula to calculate and prove Aisha's age being 18-19 and with many other variables as well

@Zonky: they're just logged out raisinskins who are too afraid to debate me 1 on 1

@trevor: you are Kurdish so this is somewhat of a self own tbf

@trevor: you are Kurdish so this is somewhat of a self own tbf

@Zonky: this man is black?
https://live.staticflickr.com/7304/9501180421_27b2a10422_z.jpg

@Zonky: kurds and iranians are literal gemmys btw, iraqis and all arabs and semites are white btw

@trevor: The "19-20" raisin relies on speculative reconstructions and selective readings of historical reports, which cannot override explicit, mass accepted hadith testimony under Islamic historiographical standards just admit you warship a child rapist

@Chud: I have no idea why goys try to refute that greedy people aren't white, they pretty obviously are (other than the hooked nose) like in cases such as Adin Ross

@trevor: Just because you're not Black doesn't mean you're not raisin skin. There are pale Indians; are Indians white now? No.

@Chud:

>Composed by Imam Muhammad al-Bukhari

Composed after 222 years of death of Prophet Muhammad (s).
Number of hadiths collected by Imam Bukhari = 600,000 hadiths.
Number of hadiths rejected by Imam Bukhari = 592,725 hadiths.
Number of hadiths selected by Imam Bukhari = 7,275 hadiths.
Hadiths rejected by assumptions = 99%
Hadiths accepted by assumptions = 1%
Imam Bukhari rejected 99 % of what he collected and called it pure lies and fabrication and accepted only 1 %.
Was he infallible like messengers ? No
Was he divinely guided by Allah in his work? No
So what is his criterion of assuming a hadith right or wrong ?

Answer - Personal assumptions.
why personal assumptions?
Because,
There was no public library of hadiths as hadiths were burned and banned at the time of four caliphs and was not recorded till first 250 years after Prophet's departing of world. (why that's another long answer)
There was no Internet database like Google drive at that time.
(mainly.....)
Imam Bukhari assumes according to him which narrators are not liars and which hadith can be considered authentic and which narrators are liars and hadith is false.
Now,
(Just calculate the mathematical and rational probability of Imam Bukhari of being wrong in some of hadiths among that 1% too)
and what authority he is of Islam?

(I have absolutely no idea how anyone can assume who is liar and who is not from first narrator in the time of Prophet Muhammad who existed 250 years ago to last narrator who was alive at the time of Bukhari)

(I can't even tell you today while living in world of modern information age that a person who lived in 1817 is liar or truthful lest the chain of narrators from 1817 to 2017 | can you?)

@trevor: Trevor says "greedy people are white" JSID

@Chud:

>just cause you ain't raisinskin color doesn't mean you ain't a raisinskin mayne

@Chud: called a white man with green eyes a "raisinskin"

JSID

@Chud: yes, semites are as core whites as germanics special.

@trevor: >greedy people are yt peolpe tu maybe just were all gemmys mayne be acceptin n shiet

@trevor: Where is that man from?

@Chud: look at this
https://as2.ftcdn.net/jpg/05/39/31/97/1000_F_539319753_UshHq3b66Rq61AT3w9Lo93CebSt9K4Cy.jpg
I get that he looks funny cause he's got greedy personish genes but he's pretty obviously white, and if you don't accept that you're anti-white

@Chud: Iraqi kurdistan

@trevor: Imam Bukhari did not rely on "personal assumptions" it was (`ilm al-rijal and isnad criticism) that was publicly shared, cross-checked, and independently applied by thousands of scholars (le snopes) ALL of who scrutinized and agreed with his conclusions saying he "couldn't know who was reliable" would also invalidate all pre modern history geg since we routinely assess the credibility of people who lived centuries ago using documented testimony. No one wants Muslims in america. Regarldess of background.

@trevor: >explosive person thinks he knows what is and isnt gemmy.

@trevor: Ok so not a white country, got it.

@Chud: The claim that "Imam Bukhari did not rely on personal assumptions; thousands of scholars scrutinized and agreed with him" misunderstands both how hadith criticism works and what Shia scholars are actually disputing.

1. Criticizing a narration = rejecting ilm al-rijal as a whole
No Shia scholar claims Bukhari "made things up" or that isnad criticism is meaningless. The disagreement is whether Bukhari's methodology is infallible or whether every narration he accepted is beyond reevaluation.

Even Sunni scholars themselves reject many narrations in Sahih al-Bukhari:
* al-Daraqutni explicitly critiqued dozens of Bukhari narrations
* Ibn Hajar admits some reports are sahih by isnad yet problematic in content

So saying "criticizing this narration invalidates all pre-modern history" is a false dilemma. Pre-modern history is assessed using multiple independent sources, chronology, and corroboration, not blind acceptance of a single report.

@Chud: the first nativist group in america the knownothings was run by a greedy person and primarily against the irish, proof semites are corewhites and will always be whiter than "muh europe"

3. Mass acceptance does not equal historical certainty
Hadith authenticity means:

"This chain meets technical criteria"
-not-
"This event is historically certain beyond contradiction"

History works differently.

When multiple early reports contradict a single isolated narration, historians must reassess.

4. Strong historical evidence supports an older age (~17-19)
Even using Sunni sources only:
* Asma' bint Abi Bakr was 10 years older than Aisha
* Asma' died at 100 AH at age 100
* This places Aisha at 17-19 at marriage, not 6-9

Additionally:
* Aisha is recorded as remembering pre-Islamic events
* She participated in early Meccan history, inconsistent with being a toddler

These reports are earlier, broader, and historically coherent, unlike the isolated Iraqi narration.

Rejecting one isolated narration with known transmitter issues, when it contradicts stronger chronological evidence, does not undermine ilm al-rijal, Sunni scholarship, or pre-modern history.

It simply means hadith grading is not the same as historical certainty, and even Sunni scholars acknowledge this distinction.

@Chud: I just showed you a white man, living in Iraq, Iraq is white cope

@trevor: https://files.catbox.moe/u8200g.png trevor bros.....

@Chud: OHNONONONONOONONNOONONONOONONONONO

@Chud: I used ai because this was a basic surface level argument, give me an actual thoughtful argument rather than the same shallow ones that have been debunked many times

@trevor: "I can't argue so I use ai" ferret uses his brain for literally nothing JSIDA

@Chud: nope, I already debunked this many times, so I just end up using ai to do it because its so easy, your arguments suck ass

@trevor: if the arguments are that bad why do you have to use ai why cant you easily debunk them on your own

>Mi too lazy to click link

>Mi too lazy to read

>why you no spoonfeed me? waaa no ai change my diaper AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCKKKKK

holy raisin I don't know how trevor tolerates the windowlicking speds seething on him 24/7 @Chud:

@Chud:

>going on the white christian website to argue why islam is good and why Kurdish people are white

@Chud:

>mi trevor logged out because im le flamboyant person!

@Chud: Hi trevor. how's it going ferret

@Chud:

>everyone who disagrees with goat rapist ideology is just a sped ok?

@Chud: this website is far from white

Considering she banned me for "tag vandalism" (even if it was some of my OWN posts) and other nameflamboyant persons for it then I believe it

@MenstrualCykill: I think that she was completely based for that since cobblestone is always right and Never ever wrong

@PinkStew: ferret she won let you hit

won't*

@MenstrualCykill: Everything has to be about sex with you guys. Can't a man just admire a strong, independent woman who singlehandedly saved Soywiki without some bitter chud assuming he's trying to get in her pants? I swear, you people never learn. Men, amrite?