@Chud: I already debunked that you specialed flamboyant person diddyblud. I'm just gonna link the post that I debunked it in because I don't wanna derail this with your senseless drivel.
>It's not based off lolicon, special. It's based off shojo bunka which isn't diddyphilic (https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824835422.003.0003) meaning the culture it's referring to was a thing BEFORE the book (Lolita) was even made KEEEEEKKKK, specialed flamboyant person.
@Chud: So you're saying it's tied because people can twist and pervert that culture to suit the needs of actual lolicon? You sound like a special. I guess that means literally anything else that can be twisted to suit the needs of others automatically mean it's bad too. Let's just stop using YouTube because diddybluds can congretate there. Let's also stop using the soysphere because certain diddys have hid in the community with the sole intention of grooming people. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense now doesn't it?
@jimbo: Yes, I say that, and it was me logged out, now stop malding, there's a higher density of Loliugly persons in the Shoja Bunka community than in the Soysphere, you mutt-noon.
@BigWhiteCock: and with the density of Loliugly persons in the Shoja Bunka community, some of them are bound to make "Shoja Bunka" Styled Games with 50% of the art being lolicon, or something like it, juuuuuust like Oneraisin.
Wouldn't really call lolinoons diddybluds, BUT there is very and I mean VERY thin line between a diddyblud and a lolicon. I'd say they are diddyblud adjacent as well (also applying this to shotanoons)
You never refuted this so I won, kiss yourself.
Oneshotcacas, what is this?