🚨💎🚨 Soysneed has returned. 💎🚨💎 Greedypersonbille has been terminated.
10/18/25 -
Simple Notice Ticker
⚠️ Uploads with fewer than 5 (five) tags and a variant tag WILL be denied ⚠️
09/15/25 - Flagspam, countrywars, and namefag posts must now be tagged meta:flagspam meta:countrywars or meta:namefags respectively. These tags may be blacklisted by users at will. Flagspam will be blocked by default.
07/07/25 - Questions, complaints, or suggestions? Send them to soysneed@soyjak.st or post in the complaint thread
jubilleiswinned: @Chud: ok ok do you want daddy jubille to change your siaper also? maybe delete all female gapejak posts because they remember soylita? what do you want little nusoi?
Geg of course fucking JUBILLE made Soylitanalism a janny
Why did you approve soytan daiper porn and furry fetish art to the 'ru jubille? Why did you unban diddybluds jubille? Why did you make a soylita diddyblud a janny jubille? Or should I say 9a0c/limeade? Why did you hide this post from the front page jubille? Why are you a diddyblud jubille? Why are you scared jubille? I'm at a loss for words at how much of a fa'ggot you are. Commit suicide.
Chud7(3): @jimbo: For anonymous users, its hidden.
@trevor: >oh im a soylita diddy, yes im a jartychad, yes im a projecting soylita diddy fnf like having fun!
Teasuck: @Chud: If you're talking about the pooner edit it's traced from an actual video of a dog being killed (according to the image, thank God I haven't watched that) and Sectianalism called it a gem despite knowing what it's traced from
Sectionalism: 1. I've been an approver since before any of these posts even existed, and before Jubille was on the site, so don't blame him.
2. The shoveldog meme was only gemmy because it was making fun of pooners, not because I support what happened to shovel-dog. I am very much against animal abuse!
3. All of these Soylita posts are from ages ago and none of them are sexual or promote any sort of sexual content. It was coally to use her in the first place, I agree, but I was making soyjaks at a rate of like 1.5x per day around this time. A few of them are bound to be coalers.
Sectionalism: @Chud:
1. No because there is a huge difference between traced 'p and traced animal abuse. Not that I support either of them, but tracing a picture of 'p violates the rights of the victim, while the horror of animal abuse is in the act itself.
2. Most of them are either A) using 'lita as a stock background character, or B) jokes about the rapeson/lita thing, which I agree in hindsight was in poor taste but was still obviously made in a joking tone.
Sectionalism: @jubille: Ho, there... Let's not call me a literal who... I'd like to think I'm pretty important!
@Chud: Based on memes involving a variant that was once, regrettably, quite popular on the website?
estrogenius: @Chud:
yep it's official, i'm done covering for greg... tired of defending his constant antics..
you're alone on this one buddy. hope you have a decent lawyer, greg...
Sectionalism: @Chud: Soylita is coal, but was also one of the most popular variants at the time. Simply making rapeson jokes or including her as a character wasn't considered abnormal or indicative of an affinity for the character. Do I look back at them and cringe? Yes, definitely, I look back at a lot of my past self and cringe. But at the time I was just making whatever memes popped into my head that seemed vaguely clever, and received almost no backlash for it. Instead, people were busy hating on me for being pro-italy or whatever
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
at this point nobody fucking cares about these rules because there's loopholes fucking everywhere
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
@trevor: >oh im a soylita diddy, yes im a jartychad, yes im a projecting soylita diddy fnf like having fun!
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
ahh post
- Reply
2. The shoveldog meme was only gemmy because it was making fun of pooners, not because I support what happened to shovel-dog. I am very much against animal abuse!
3. All of these Soylita posts are from ages ago and none of them are sexual or promote any sort of sexual content. It was coally to use her in the first place, I agree, but I was making soyjaks at a rate of like 1.5x per day around this time. A few of them are bound to be coalers.
- Reply
1. No because there is a huge difference between traced 'p and traced animal abuse. Not that I support either of them, but tracing a picture of 'p violates the rights of the victim, while the horror of animal abuse is in the act itself.
2. Most of them are either A) using 'lita as a stock background character, or B) jokes about the rapeson/lita thing, which I agree in hindsight was in poor taste but was still obviously made in a joking tone.
- Reply
- Reply
@Chud: Based on memes involving a variant that was once, regrettably, quite popular on the website?
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I just think you're trying to stir raisin with random people over menial crap they've done years ago
yep it's official, i'm done covering for greg... tired of defending his constant antics..
you're alone on this one buddy. hope you have a decent lawyer, greg...
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply