⚠️ Uploads with fewer than 5 (five) tags and a variant tag WILL be denied ⚠️
09/15/25 - Flagspam, countrywars, and namefag posts must now be tagged meta:flagspam meta:countrywars or meta:namefags respectively. These tags may be blacklisted by users at will. Flagspam will be blocked by default.
07/07/25 - Questions, complaints, or suggestions? Send them to soysneed@soyjak.st or post in the complaint thread
H3K: I'm not a hater of nuvariants, I really am not, in fact, I find nuvariants to be very useful. But I'm tired of all the raisinty and pathetic excuses for "variants" that are raisinting up the 'catty (such as Vlodstein, Floweyjak, the storybotsjak, etc). I despise these dusty "variants" that BARELY meet the soyjak criteria, whether it be an awful forced fusionjak (and trust me, I usually like fusionjaks), or some specialy ugly personslop with a stubble and glasses edited in to say:
>LOOK GUYS, MY VARIANT IS HECKIN' IAS BECAUSE XHE HAS A STUBBLE AND GLASSES PLEASE VALIDATE MY TRANSGENDER IDENTITY AND NEOPRONOUNS!
Want to know what a good nuvariant looks like? Look at Blartjak, Mentaljak, Syndromejak, and Dumjaqcue (or Doomjak), these are all examples of gemmy nuvariants (or at the very least nuvariants with gemmy potential) that caught on organically.
H3K: @greg: It's far better than Vlodstein.
@Chud: I find my own remake to be better personally, and hopefully my remake lets the nuvariant unlock its potential that it has hidden inside of it, most nuvariants have a little bit of potential.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Want to know what a good nuvariant looks like? Look at Blartjak, Mentaljak, Syndromejak, and Dumjaqcue (or Doomjak), these are all examples of gemmy nuvariants (or at the very least nuvariants with gemmy potential) that caught on organically.
- Reply
- Reply
Meds
- Reply
- Reply
@Chud: I find my own remake to be better personally, and hopefully my remake lets the nuvariant unlock its potential that it has hidden inside of it, most nuvariants have a little bit of potential.
- Reply
- Reply
GEG! THIS IS FUNNY!
- Reply