IP 216.73.216.185 has been banned until the end of time because of VPN Detected
If you couldn't possibly be guilty of what you're banned for, the person we banned probably had a dynamic IP address and so do you. Please email soysneed@soyjak.st or post in the /q/ thread.
See http://whatismyipaddress.com/dynamic-static for more information.
Image
Commenting
Comment Formatting Options
Want to report a comment? Report the post itself with relevant details.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Such narratives have historically been used by fascists, especially the National Socialists, to justify their policies of violence and oppression.
Social reality is not determined by genes, but by the relations of production,that is, the relationship between labor, property, class interests, and the organization of production. These relations are subject to change, and transforming them is the goal of every genuine communist movement.
The claim that humans are determined by their biological "understructure" contradicts not only historical evidence, but also the fundamental principle of socialism: that human beings can change their conditions through collective action, education, solidarity, and the transformation of society itself.
Understructure does not directly precondition the manifesting Social Structures (Superstructure) upon the base but the Base itself. Base rests upon a biological foundation, that is the compositional faculties that Humans differentiate among eachother within geneological sub-composites, colloquially known as Race as with it's most expedient taxonomic code. Social Reality materializes off of Relative Production, or Base in this case, to which itself manifests off of the faculties of Being, to which said faculties come at direct proportionality of the collective Being's physiological, neurological and psychosomatic merits. It would be baselessly universalist and reductive to believe that Races, or genological sub-composites are entirely the same amongst eachother and each of them possessed the same faculties of constructing Productive Relations amongst eachother. Observable history proves this. Marx knew this, and Hegel knew, precisely why they both dabbled within this supposedly "pseudoscientific and reactionary" race science. It is empirically irrefutable. Understructure is the direct connection of Nature towards Human civilization at it's foundation.
Transforming the base via directly transforming it's Understructure was precisely what National Socialists and Fascists sought to do. Socialization of labor only could've achieved so much, socialization of racial biology needed to exist as a necessary precursor. Races, or human genetic sub-composites, were fragmented and solitary (especially within modern conditions), and was directly weaponized by the bourgeoisie to diminish proletarian social relationships amongst eachother. Eugenicism, to such capacity, is praxis as an immanent presentation of the Naturality. Quasi-liberalist moral purity tests that disregard it as "immoral" and "oppressive" mean absolutely nothing amongst concrete reality. Nazism's end-goal is post-race, a world where the remaining Humans possess collective racial geneology. There would be little reason for State to represent socialized ownership of the means of production anymore, and to that means even have to exist, hinted by the means of Volkgemeinschaft. The subsequent deconstruction of the State will transpire under collective ethnonationalist relations.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
get a grip ferret
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Humans aren't robots controlled by DNA. The idea that "racial unification" would somehow eliminate contradiction and create a harmonious society is not only scientifically baseless,it's just Stupid. Class struggle, exploitation, and inequality exist within any group, no matter how genetically similar. These are shaped by ownership, power, and labor, not by someone's genome. You believe in raisin from 80 years ago
Anyone who's actually read Marx knows: historical materialism is about productive relations, not skull shapes. Race science has no place in Marxist theory. Trying to rebrand fascist race theory with Marxist vocabulary just shows you don't understand either one.
- Reply
- Reply
this is probably your start as a fetish artist and you probably dont even know it yet
@Silberfisch:
i went on a side tangent of how [race biology -> material conditions -> society], you could clearly see this distinction both in the original post and how i explained understructure's relations with the dialectical presentation of history. outside the theoretical underpinnings of which i conceived the theory of "Understructure", you're capable of finding out the truth by inglehart-welzel's models, all the numerous available sources on racial physiology, how environmental factors influences neurology, cerebral composite distributions among race, and the human genome in relation to geography.
you're only argument is that Understructure is entirely nebulous and absurd only because it just is, something that cannot be ever treated as fact as it would unravel all the social progress done under the name of marxism if it was so. fortunately, i'm not a marxist, dialectical materialism and economic critique were the only semi-useful sciences that came from leftoids and the rest can be disregarded as utter fragmentivist trash. which is why the only continuation of your philosophy of "marxist" socialism just so happens to be ethnonationalist country that has an observed history with pro-racialist policy (glory to the PRC), or the numerous other forms of semi-successful socialism consisting of authoritarian nationals where the state just substitutes the bourgeoisie to varying forms in the form of labor organization.
also i got these ideas from talking with bunkerugly people, not xitter. somehow interacting with your cohort made me more reactionary by time
- Reply
FUCK i sound so ESL
- Reply
- Reply
forgive me for thinking communists were people concerned with actual rational analysis
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
get actual original material for starters
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
But honestly, It would be gemmy to see communism develop strong, recognizable symbolism again, something that spreads like Nazism does today. You don't need a wall of text or endless arguments if you've got a spinning symbol and some Eurodance.
We gather with heavy hearts to remember Junibooru-a man who lived simply but left a lasting mark on those who truly saw him. Short in stature and chubby in frame, he resided in a modest hut, lived on his own terms, and walked through life with a spirit that was raw, real, and entirely his.
Of African descent, Junibooru cherished his roots and found deep joy in the bold, comforting flavors of Afro cuisine. Meals with him were more than sustenance-they were expressions of love, memory, and identity. Food was one of the many ways he kept his culture close, and he shared it generously.
He was a person of contradictions-gentle but blunt, quiet but unforgettable. He bore a scent that many found hard to ignore-earthy, unapologetic, and part of the unfiltered truth he carried in every aspect of his life. Junibooru did not pretend. He was who he was.
Tragically, Junibooru died by suicide. We do not pretend to understand the weight he carried, nor the pain that brought him to that moment. But we do know this: he mattered. His life, in all its complexity, was worthy of love, compassion, and remembrance.
Let us not define him by how he left us, but remember him for how he lived-with honesty, depth, cultural pride, and a stubborn refusal to be anyone but himself. May we carry forward his memory not only with sorrow, but with tenderness and truth.
Rest peacefully, Junibooru.
You were seen. You are missed. You are loved.
noon? Why are you acting like you're not some immigrant as well?
I've seen you on leftypol, go back.
noon, you're 16, you're doing nothing other than failing school and larping with dead, debunked, specialed economic ideologies from 100 years ago.