SoyBooruIP 216.73.216.108 has been banned until the end of time because of VPN Detected
If you couldn't possibly be guilty of what you're banned for, the person we banned probably had a dynamic IP address and so do you.
See http://whatismyipaddress.com/dynamic-static for more information.
Image
Commenting
Comment Formatting Options
Want to report a comment? Report the post itself with relevant details.
Want to report a comment? Report the post itself with relevant details.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
p but ste need vericaton use temmail o algo
tempshitskinmail.org: Practic, easy temp-mail provided for 'P!"
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
https://web.archive.org/web/20190220143359/http://aryanism.net/
it was "white" american racist retards like francis parker yockey,george lincoln rockwell and wiliam luther pierce,who made nazism synonymous with white supremacy/ethno-nationalism (which it self is another form of judaism)
contrarily to what wignats believe,jews aren't bad because they're liberals or leftist,but because they're RIGHT WING (see ayn rand,murray rothbard,meir kahane,benjamin nethanayu,Ovadia Yosef,the heritage foundation,projet esther,project 2025,"end wokeness","libs of tiktok",bronze age pervert and all zionist jews in right-wing parties.)
actual fascists/third positionists like benito mussolini,adolf hitler, gaddafi or the SSNP has nothing to do with right-wigners, ethno-nationalists and "white" supremacists (zionist stooges) like the KKK,yockey,rockwell,pierce,anders breivik and brenton tarrent.
now answers these questions,wignats:
When Adolf Hitler condemned white colonial atrocities, he was engaging in a rhetorical strategy rather than expressing genuine moral outrage or solidarity with colonized peoples. Hitler's references to colonial atrocities-such as those committed by the British, French, or Americans-were typically meant to highlight what he saw as the hypocrisy of Western powers who criticized Germany's actions while having their own histories of violence and oppression in their overseas empires
Key points about Hitler's intent:
Deflection and Justification: Hitler used the example of white colonial atrocities to deflect criticism from Nazi policies and actions. He argued that the so-called "civilized" Western democracies had themselves committed mass violence, dispossession, and genocide in their colonies, and thus had no moral authority to judge Germany
Hypocrisy of the West: He accused Western powers of being "hard-hearted and obdurate" toward the suffering of Jews while ignoring or justifying their own colonial crimes, such as the dispossession and killing of indigenous peoples in the Americas or Africa
Rationalization of Nazi Policy: Hitler sometimes cited colonial atrocities to rationalize Nazi expansionism and racial policies. He admired the imperial models of the British and Americans, viewing their conquests and treatment of indigenous populations as precedents for his own ambitions in Eastern Europe
No Genuine Condemnation: There is no evidence that Hitler's condemnation was motivated by genuine concern for the victims of colonial violence. Instead, he used these examples to serve Nazi propaganda and to make a case for German actions as part of a global pattern of power politics
In summary, when Hitler condemned white colonial atrocities, he was not denouncing imperialism out of principle, but rather using it as a rhetorical tool to attack his enemies, justify Nazi policies, and expose what he saw as Western hypocrisy.