AccountPostsCommentsHelpSystemTagsWiki
AllMy FavoritesPopular PostsPopular by DayPopular by MonthPopular by YearRandom Post
Blotter updated: 10/18/25 Show/Hide Show All
  • 10/18/25 - Simple Notice Ticker
    ⚠️ Uploads with fewer than 5 (five) tags and a variant tag WILL be denied ⚠️
  • 10/18/25 - This Sunday at 6PM UTC the first Soytopia gamenight after months of downtime will finally happen. Check the /v/ thread for more information. tf2.soyjak.st
  • 09/15/25 - Flagspam, countrywars, and namefag posts must now be tagged meta:flagspam meta:countrywars or meta:namefags respectively. These tags may be blacklisted by users at will. Flagspam will be blocked by default.
  • 07/07/25 - Questions, complaints, or suggestions? Send them to soysneed@soyjak.st or post in the complaint thread

IP 216.73.216.185 has been banned until the end of time because of VPN Detected

If you couldn't possibly be guilty of what you're banned for, the person we banned probably had a dynamic IP address and so do you. Please email soysneed@soyjak.st or post in the /q/ thread.

See http://whatismyipaddress.com/dynamic-static for more information.

Contact the staff (be sure to include this message)

Advertisement
Image
main image
Uploader Chud,
Tags bald balding beard glasses ias jewtube lore sharty_culture shredded_nerd soyjak stubble thumbnail variant:bartender variant:brandon variant:el_perro_rabioso variant:smugjak youtube
Source
Unknown
Locked No
Rating IAS
Prev | Index | Next
Comments
avatar
- Reply
entiral:
>calls voluptuous taco lover a slopjak

>doesn't know of the original shirtjak image despite it literally being on the 'ki

>video is just a collage of different jaks while not diving further into the details

>Gets soystory wrong

Other than that trvthnvke about xitter which everyone already knows about, this video is a coal with gemmy aspects
Also I recognize a lot of the 'jaks in the video being recently made.
avatar
- Reply
Addison: Interesting
- Reply
Chud1: @entiral: tbf he could be saying that to get around censors
avatar
- Reply
Addison: Watched it, it says the right things but somehow not a single 'jak of mine made it in even doe he's using recent 'ru posts
avatar
- Reply
entiral: @Chud: I'll give it he atleast made reference to ugly personella, not a lot of people would do that
- Reply
Chud2: mentioned soytan therefore gem
- Reply
Chud3: ^jartychad
- Reply
Chud4: @entiral: o algo
- Reply
Chud5:
>o alg-ACK
- Reply
CHRISTBVLL: Kinda sad the only trvthnvke he dropped was about the xitter, wasted potential tbh (still gemmy thoughbeit]
Commenting
Comment Formatting Options
Want to report a comment? Report the post itself with relevant details.
Advertisement