Chud¹: warrior-z made this

Chud²: ^ it's true

Chud³: Warrior z here logged out, can confirm

Gringoslayer1488: Warrior 'p logged off

Warrior-Z: @Gringoslayer1488: Chimperator gone baiting after jerking his TBP to pooner porn online, you lose all debates.

Warrior-Z-:

Chud⁴: @Warrior-Z: Are you and gringoslayer competing for public office or some shit? why do the outcomes of "debates" matter so much to you

Chud⁵: @Chud: this site has turned into 100% namefag snca where "debates" over religion. Whatever happened to 'jakking?

Warrior-Z: @Warrior-Z-:
@Chud: Because I actually care about the truth and dismantling bad arguments, along with people being bad faith towards what I stand for.

Chud⁶: @Chud:

>Whatever happened to 'jakking?

satoko_houjou_fan followed by Warrior-Z. That's what happened

Mick: @Chud:
Left out 2022 Penis color wars and Russia-Ukraine

Warrior-Z: @Chud:
@Chud:
I don't get why some of you crybabies think that 'jakking, raisinflinging, debates, and namefagging can't happen in one place. Those things dont contradict each other, it's always been like this.

Chud⁷: ^ huge brap

Chud⁸: @Warrior-Z: shitflinging and debates actually cant happen in one place because the former disrupts the latter

Warrior-Z: @Chud:
Not really, you can insult the othere WHILE making points, that very much possible but it would boil down to a BAD FAITH debate.
@Chud: Brapped on Hoag's Object award.

Chud⁹: @Warrior-Z: if you wanna debate religion, post coal and be an annoying attention whore, then boy do I have a website for you! https://twitter.com/

Slvt4BIBISI: Whiter than u Muhammad.

Chud¹⁰: @Warrior-Z: if you wanna debate religion, post coal and be an annoying attention whore, then boy do I have a website for you! https://www.lipstickalley.com/

Warrior-Z: @Chud:

>if you wanna debate religion,

Religious debates have always happened here.

>post coal

That's subjective.

>be an annoying attention whore

Only attentionwhores are the ones coming to pick fights 24/7 even when I casually go around.
Also go screw youself xitter immigrant.
@Chud: Astrofene goes on that site everyday.

Chud¹¹: @Warrior-Z: Really? Does Astrofene really go on that site every single day of his life? Do you have any proof to back that up?

Warrior-Z: @Chud: What's gonna be the basis for that skepticism?

CatChud:

>ITZ DA AMERUCANS!!!!!

why do pajeets think it's only the US and muslims that hates them? i've seen people from nearly every 1st world country and even south american countries shit on pajeets online and show hate for them. pajeets are the global unifier in the way that everyone hates them

Chud¹²: @Warrior-Z: Well astrofene is a male, and while he may not be white, he most certainly isnt black. Lipstick alley's userbase overwhelmingly consists of black females, so it would be unusual for astrofene to be an active and frequent user of it.

Warrior-Z: @Chud:

>overwhelmingly consists of black females

Really? Where's the substantiation for that?

>so it would be unusual for astrofene to be an active and frequent user of it

Define unusual in this case, and why would it strictly be based off of race?

Chud¹³: @Warrior-Z:

>Really? Where's the substantiation for that?

What's gonna be the basis for that skepticism?

>and why would it strictly be based off of race?

What's gonna be the basis for that skepticism?

sabiopajin: @CatChud: Truth nuke..

Warrior-Z: @Chud:
The fact that claims require evidence.
Because the claim that someone's activity on a forum is "unusual" based on race is an assumption.

Chud¹⁴: @Warrior-Z: The claim that an individual is an active user of a forum also requires evidence

Chud¹⁵:

>dumpter

soiled it

Warrior-Z: @Chud: Sure, but now you're shifting the burden.

Warrior-Z: @Chud: OH HE DID SOIL IT

Chud¹⁶: @Warrior-Z: The burden of proof was always on you because you made the initial claim

Warrior-Z: @Chud: And yet you haven't substantiated the basis for your skepticism.

Chud¹⁷: @Warrior-Z: You don't need to "substantiate" skepticism, especially when the subject of the skepticism is a claim with zero evidence

Warrior-Z: @Chud: Yes you do, because what you're referencing is not the basis but the AUTOMATIC position of skepticism, a position doesn't fulfill itself.

Chud¹⁸: @Warrior-Z: Im dismissing your initial argument via Hitchens razor btw since you didnt provide evidence

Warrior-Z: @Chud:
That's not really how it works since it's now an equal interpretation, you dont have evidence for YOUR premise either, so I can dismiss that. Either way your claims are already in question.

Chud¹⁹: @Warrior-Z: Approve the gigachad post

Chud²⁰: @Warrior-Z: Gigachad

Chud²¹: @Warrior-Z:

> Only attentionwhores are the ones coming to pick fights 24/7 even when I casually go around.

You always use this line to deflect when people accuse you of attention whoring. If you really hated people bringing up your name in random comment sections, you'd stop responding with your brimstones copypastas. But you don't, because you love the attention. And that's without even mentioning my suspicion that you are the one who posts shit like "warrior-'p looks like this" in unrelated comment sections.

Warrior-Z: @Chud:

>You always use this line to deflect when people accuse you of attention whoring

Because it is valid.

>If you really hated people bringing up your name in random comment sections, you'd stop responding

But that would be giving up, that would be LETTING them win. Even if I stopped, they'll continue. Raisintoko for example and others get mentioned in posts but dont blurt out raisin. You don't seem to understand how this works.

>But you don't, because you love the attention

No, it is because I never back down and never give up.

>that's without even mentioning my suspicion that you are the one who posts shit like "warrior-'p looks like this" in unrelated comment sections

Well, no, they come in different timezones AND why would I speak negatively of myself? Not to mention they have differing IPs.
@Chud: Approved.

Penismanhd: @Chud: Look for yourself

Chud²²: @Warrior-Z:

>But that would be giving up, that would be LETTING them win.

This is a loser mindset that produces people like patrick tomlinson

Warrior-Z: @Chud: Patrick didn't have this mindset, he's an effeminate retarded gegbvll that doesn't care about winning but only cares about what he accomplishes for himself. Just an overall selfish person.

Chud²³: @Warrior-Z: His mindset and "family mantra" is literally "Don't let the idiots win" or "#DLTIW"
https://x.com/stealthygeek/status/1171566931293495298

Warrior-Z: @Chud: And what does he mean by winning? What was really his end goal here? They've already won against him.

Chud²⁴: @Warrior-Z: Well patrick is incredibly argumentative, as evidenced by is incessant need to reply to everything, as well as by his school teachers saying that he would argue with a fence post, so to him "winning" probably means "winning arguments"
There's a certain soybooru user who also unhealthily prioritizes winning arguments. I'll give you a hint: His name starts with 'W' and ends with 'arrior-Z'

Warrior-Z: @Chud: Patrick argued for the sake of arguing, even when it didn't benefit him, it actively made him look worse. He wasn't even trying to win he was just obsessed with engagement, and just hearing himself go on and on. I argue because people bring my name up just to take shots at me. If I don't respond, it lets them set the plot. Patrick interprets that differently.

Chud²⁵: @Warrior-Z: holy shit you really have zero self awareness

Warrior-Z: @Chud: Do you even know how narratives work here?

Chud²⁶: @Warrior-Z: you're literally exactly like fatrick lmao, needing to constantly correcT the rec0rd

Warrior-Z: @Chud:
Patrick corrected the rec0rd because he needed the attention that comes from it and again, he wanted to hear himself talk constantly. I do it because if I don't, people like you will run wild with crappy takes and theories.
There's no actual theory about Patrick, everyone knows he's freaking stupid. There's no debate.

Chud²⁷: HOLY NAS WOJAK COAL NOT EVEN A SONGLE SOYJAK

Chud²⁸: @Warrior-Z: Patrick doesn't do it for the attention, he acts the same way even in text messages that only he and his troll could see. And if he liked hearing himself talk, you'd figure his literary output would be a bit higher, but he hasn't published a book in years

Warrior-Z: @Chud: That just proves my point, Patrick wasn't trying to set the narrative to defend himself strategically, he was doing it just to do it, even when it had no audience. That's just brain rot. And not writing books doesn't mean he doesn't love hearing himself talk. Dude spent years spewing nonsense on Twitter, that's enough to write 10 books.

Chud²⁹: guys, i got raped yesterday

Chud³⁰:

Bukhara: the indian uses wojaks, and makes his memes in english, all self-defeating to the concept of his "India"
He leaves his country of origin, usually only to return for remittance, for a hygienic Northern country that he enjoys
Dravidians, upon seeing the Ancient Aryans colonize northern Indian plateaus, immigrated the same way because of the attraction of wealth
Slaves usually always move to the living of their master, because they need instruction through locality by nature of their existence
Indians are surgically attached to the West, like the rest of the Turd World, because they feel entitled to the benefits of people whom they subconsciously perceive to be superior, but whom must be made aware of their purile opinions

sabiopajin: @Bukhara: I did a greentext

Chud³¹: Indian women have always been cum receptacles for superior Aryan cock, the whole of Ancient Indian history has been the BLEACHING of dark-skinned Dravidian women and the slaughter of the native men by blonde-eyed blonde Aryans invading from the northwest, this has produced much atavistic and subconscious resentment in the modern Indian male psyche, since upon apprehension of a White Man with his Main Character Energy he is reminded of the BLEACHING of his female ancestors in ancient history.