On the Saracens and their question

 
Among all sub-humans in this world the Saracens ranked the lowest, and I am tired of pretending they are Arabs, Semites, or even humans.
>Who are the Saracens?
Originally the name "Saracen" came from the Arabs to refer to a group of sub-humans who lived besides them, these Niggers knew nothing but stealing, high way robbery and prostitution.
The term "Saracen" came from the Aramaic root "𐡎𐡓𐡒-Saraq" Which mean literally means "thieves" and since Arabic born from an Aramaic dialect it made it, "سرق، السراقيين او السراسيين" .
>Another theory came from John of Damascus
Was that they came form Sarah, AKA Abraham's wife, and it make sense as the Saracens were splits in 2 cast, one of them where called the Saracens-السراسنة and the other been called The Hajrian Saracens-السراسنة الهاجريون, but in general they didn't call themselves these names as these were their casts, they didn't have a name, they just called themselves by their tribe's name till some Greek Nigger tried to to create the world map and named them Arabs, but not to mixed them with normal Arabs he twisted the name to be "Arabians".
>And this wasn't the first time either
White people and their mentality of "You are all the same" isn't a new thing, they also called the Hun with this name because they looked like the Han people.
Anyway the Saracens are also known as Beduion/Gulfies/Arabians today, and the term Saracens never been used ever since the middle ages.
And the Arab larp is more real than ever today.


Historically Arabs been the nomadic tribe of Aram, even the name itself in Aramaic means "Nomad".
And Historically the whole Semitic race started like this:

This has been proven to be linguistically accurate, as not much been known about the Amorites but a lot is known about the Arameans and their Nomadic variants (AKA Arabs)
>In linguistic laws every language name has a meaning in the Language itself
Take for example German language, there is no such thing as a "German language" it's "Dutch" which literally means "people" or folks as the name of the language itself and the ethnic group point to a people.
The same goes with the Norse Language, "Norse" is referring to the Northern people who migrated from Germany, again, it refer to a people and it have a meaning in the language itself.
The same goes for Vietnamese, there is no such thing as "Vietnamese Language" it's "Tiếng Việt" and the "Việt" was a name for an ethnic group of china that means farmers, again, the name of the language had a meaning in the very language itself.
But Arabic? Arabic have absolutely no meaning, the Name Arab in Arabic has no meaning besides the Islamic story about some dam in Yemen and some Jew abandoning his wife and son in the desert and some how this make the story of a language.
The fact that Arabic have no meaning in itself but has a meaning in Aramaic have pushed a German Linguist named Christoph Luxenberg to search the language, and he wrote The "Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran", in it he discussed the fact that Arabic didn't evolve as a language, but was indeed an Aramaic dialect, another researcher named Ahmad Al-jallad toke his book and based his search on more archeology than linguistics, he wrote "A manual of the historical grammar of Arabic", he also have come to the conclusion that Arabic is indeed an Aramaic dialect, this, not to mention that ALL Ancient text found in Arabia been written in southern Semitic language not northern, keep in mind that Arabic is a northern Semitic language.
>And the oldest Arabic script
been found in Syria 600 years before Islam while the first Arab Kingdom was also in the Levant, so the fact that emerging languages cannot be written in any system unless it's the father system, for example you can't really write English with chinese characters and the vice versa (unless you put 500 diacritics on letters) and even then it's hard, which is weird considering Arabic have been written using Aramaic alphabet for 1200 years, then the Syriac alphabet, then the modern Arabic as we know it (and even this modern alphabet was created in Iraq and been based on Aramaic geg)
>The whole story of Islam revolve around a lie that isn't allowed to be Discussed
Because it will destroy the foundation of religion itself
To understand this lie, let's start with the first Caliphs, the Umayyads and Abbasids. As the story goes, the Umayyads and Abbasids are naturally relatives, but they are not.
All Genealogy shit aside, these are the descendant of the 2 groups, according to the Genealogy they are cousins, according to the genetic searches they aren't.
Now let's toke a look into the Umayyads empire, shall we?
>Muawiya wasn't a Mudslime
Ahmad bin Hanbil, the founding father of Hanbali school said this (the school the majority of Mudslimes follows) not to mention that the coins in the Umayyads empire had the Nestorian cross, Nestorians were more of an ethno-religion back then

>Muawiya was drinking wine
Which is also prohibited in Islam
And the most thing was al-hara battel, an invasion to Arabia lead by him against his own "cousins" and the complete destruction of Kaaba and Madinah, with tons of the Saracens been enslaved and taken back to Damascus.

Non of this make any sense on why would he do such thing to his own people
>why would he order their killing
>Why would he ordered them to be raped?
>Why would he order them to be enslaved?
>Why would he called them Animals?
Among many other words
>Why would he use the Syrian army
Didn't they have any army base in their own homeland?
So even historically it doesn't make any sense that the Saracens were Arabs
So in a nutshell:
>Linguistically, historically, genetically they aren't Arabs,
What are they then?
Well John of Damascus didn't lie when he said they are kikes, they called him heretic, kafir but they didn't call him a liar.
The Saracens are kikes, and every single trait of a Kike is a trait of a Saracen.
Because when you give Kikes infinite money and power, what would they do with it? Wars, famines, raping of children, the destruction of everything beautiful and has a soul.
The Saracens got infinite money and power since 1974:
>Started 10 wars
In less than 50 years at a rate of one new war every 5 years
>Caused the extinction of 4 wild life
They hunted them to death once they got their hands on a good weapons
>Been known to be the most Pedos
And pray on children, boys and girls alike

>Faggtoroy
The most searched word in both Saudi Arabia and Oman is for gay sex

>The destruction of Art
Saracen groups like MBC, Rotana would buy the artistic shows and turned it into a brimstone by projecting their inner soul on it
They are kikes after all, it isn't a shock for anyone who dig deep in the history of the middle east to discover that.
>Now, why would they be less than sub-humans?
The measurement of humans and sub-humans can be in what Antoun Saadeh said about the evolution and ability to organize in a civil way.

The Saracens couldn't even reach the tribe stage yet despite the fact they take pride in their nomadic history.
>They don't recognize their own rapebabies as one of them
Hell they don't even recognize their own brothers, look up the "Bedoon issue" where hundreds of thousand of Saracens were deprived of human rights just because...just because they aren't like them okay?
>They don't marry from their own race
Just like kikes, 64% of the Saracens marry from other nations with all the obstacles their gov put in place, before these obstacles 100% of them married from non-Saracinia foid because they themselves see their own race as a race of sub-humans.
This is also a trait of a kike, most kikes marry non-Jewesses.
>Ashamed of their own race

>They are a matriarchy
The Saracens literally use their mother's race as an insult.
Such insult exist in no no society but the one ruled by a matriarchal laws

The Saracens aren't Arabs, they are kikes.
And like kikes they exist in the bottom of the racial hierarchy.