6 days ago#1400991
>Wildān means sex slaves.
This is simply not what the word means. wildan is the plural of walad (boy/child). The Qur'an uses it to describe youthful attendants in Paradise. Calling them "sex boys" is an assertion that the verse itself never makes.
If someone wants to argue they are sexual servants, the burden is on them to produce a verse or authentic hadith explicitly saying so. They can't.
The pearl comparison has nothing to do with sex. The Qur'an compares many things to pearls because pearls symbolize brightness, and value. 56:22 and 23 compares the women of Paradise to pearls as well.
Ibn al-Qurtubi said because of their beauty, abundance, and purity except that refutes Asoori because this doesn't refer to sex or intercourse. The argument injects an unrelated Arab wedding custom.
>Pearls were scattered on wedding beds.
Even assuming such a custom existed among some wealthy people, that proves nothing. Pearls were also symbols, again. Jumping from pearls existed at weddings to
to therefore every pearl metaphor means sex is retarded.
The Qur'an tells you what these attendants do. They circulate with drinks but nothing sexual is mentioned.
Ghilman likewise means young males or youths depending on context.
> Quraysh were faggots.
Needs evidence.
> Muhammad was gifted a little boy.
Being gifted a servant or captive was common in Late Antiquity. That doesn't imply sexual use and instead of treating them as property, Muhammad PBUH immediately emancipated him and treated him like a beloved son.
> Torturing little boys.
Needs an authentic source with context instead of a vague assertion.
@Garf @Asoori @LesothosTopRapist @Gold
This is simply not what the word means. wildan is the plural of walad (boy/child). The Qur'an uses it to describe youthful attendants in Paradise. Calling them "sex boys" is an assertion that the verse itself never makes.
If someone wants to argue they are sexual servants, the burden is on them to produce a verse or authentic hadith explicitly saying so. They can't.
The pearl comparison has nothing to do with sex. The Qur'an compares many things to pearls because pearls symbolize brightness, and value. 56:22 and 23 compares the women of Paradise to pearls as well.
Ibn al-Qurtubi said because of their beauty, abundance, and purity except that refutes Asoori because this doesn't refer to sex or intercourse. The argument injects an unrelated Arab wedding custom.
>Pearls were scattered on wedding beds.
Even assuming such a custom existed among some wealthy people, that proves nothing. Pearls were also symbols, again. Jumping from pearls existed at weddings to
to therefore every pearl metaphor means sex is retarded.
The Qur'an tells you what these attendants do. They circulate with drinks but nothing sexual is mentioned.
Ghilman likewise means young males or youths depending on context.
> Quraysh were faggots.
Needs evidence.
> Muhammad was gifted a little boy.
Being gifted a servant or captive was common in Late Antiquity. That doesn't imply sexual use and instead of treating them as property, Muhammad PBUH immediately emancipated him and treated him like a beloved son.
> Torturing little boys.
Needs an authentic source with context instead of a vague assertion.
@Garf @Asoori @LesothosTopRapist @Gold
6 days ago#1401189
Many people have nothing but weak hadiths or completely made up hadith's. Like with the claim of how Shias build elephants from clay to fly to Mekkah.>Wildān means sex slaves.
This is simply not what the word means. wildan is the plural of walad (boy/child). The Qur'an uses it to describe youthful attendants in Paradise. Calling them "sex boys" is an assertion that the verse itself never makes.
If someone wants to argue they are sexual servants, the burden is on them to produce a verse or authentic hadith explicitly saying so. They can't.
The pearl comparison has nothing to do with sex. The Qur'an compares many things to pearls because pearls symbolize brightness, and value. 56:22 and 23 compares the women of Paradise to pearls as well.
Ibn al-Qurtubi said because of their beauty, abundance, and purity except that refutes Asoori because this doesn't refer to sex or intercourse. The argument injects an unrelated Arab wedding custom.
>Pearls were scattered on wedding beds.
Even assuming such a custom existed among some wealthy people, that proves nothing. Pearls were also symbols, again. Jumping from pearls existed at weddings to
to therefore every pearl metaphor means sex is retarded.
The Qur'an tells you what these attendants do. They circulate with drinks but nothing sexual is mentioned.
Ghilman likewise means young males or youths depending on context.
> Quraysh were faggots.
Needs evidence.
> Muhammad was gifted a little boy.
Being gifted a servant or captive was common in Late Antiquity. That doesn't imply sexual use and instead of treating them as property, Muhammad PBUH immediately emancipated him and treated him like a beloved son.
> Torturing little boys.
Needs an authentic source with context instead of a vague assertion.
@Garf @Asoori @LesothosTopRapist @Gold
pantokrator
Its retired and over
6 days ago#1401790
the most brootal dnrpill ever
today i debated my siblings on abortion, they stormed off, and i told them "pack my luggage, you lose all debates son" irl
6 days ago#1401923
they were bringing up anti-muslim arguments for some reason even though it has nothing to do with it.today i debated my siblings on abortion, they stormed off, and i told them "pack my luggage, you lose all debates son" irl
>ermmmm women are le oppressed in afghanistan therefore gay freemasonry and promiscuity is a virtue we have to kill babies over here for
Asoori
The sane person in a world full of insane people will be called insane.
It been heavily used to refers to sex slaves.>Wildān means sex slaves.
This is simply not what the word means. wildan is the plural of walad (boy/child).
The word faggot means bundle of sticks, but dose it refers to a bundle of sticks?!
Do you trust Al-Qurtubi's Interpretation?!The Qur'an uses it to describe youthful attendants in Paradise. Calling them "sex boys" is an assertion that the verse itself never makes.
He compared them to pearls that you throw on the bed before fucking the woman.
So yeah.
So you trust part of what Al-Qurtubi said but only the part that suite you?If someone wants to argue they are sexual servants, the burden is on them to produce a verse or authentic hadith explicitly saying so. They can't.
The pearl comparison has nothing to do with sex.
The Quran did not say لؤلؤ منثور about foids in heaven.The Qur'an compares many things to pearls because pearls symbolize brightness, and value. 56:22 and 23 compares the women of Paradise to pearls as well.
It did not compare them to something you do in your wedding night on your wedding bed.
Saracens, Not Arabs.Ibn al-Qurtubi said because of their beauty, abundance, and purity except that refutes Asoori because this doesn't refer to sex or intercourse. The argument injects an unrelated Arab wedding custom.
And the Quran came from them, and al Qurtubi himself compared them to the wedding pearl you throw on bed before having sex.
So do you trust Al-Qurtubi or not?! I did not make this shit up it's completely from your own fucking books you stupid Nigger! you either trust all what he said or don't.>Pearls were scattered on wedding beds.
Even assuming such a custom existed among some wealthy people, that proves nothing. Pearls were also symbols, again. Jumping from pearls existed at weddings to
to therefore every pearl metaphor means sex is retarded.
Which one?!
The Beginning and the End, by Ibn Kathir, Volume two.The Qur'an tells you what these attendants do. They circulate with drinks but nothing sexual is mentioned.
Ghilman likewise means young males or youths depending on context.
> Quraysh were faggots.
Needs evidence.
They used to let their little boys get naked and transfer rocks for some reason.
And your prophet got hit on his head by his uncle who hold him only slaves boy get naked.
That's the breaking point between Ghilman غلمان and Wedan ولدان as the last refer to exclusively to sex slave boys.
Why did he call him a sexual slur then?!> Muhammad was gifted a little boy.
Being gifted a servant or captive was common in Late Antiquity. That doesn't imply sexual use and instead of treating them as property, Muhammad PBUH immediately emancipated him and treated him like a beloved son.
Major Fatwas, Book of Hudud, Volume 3, Chapter Al-taazez الفتوى الكبرى-كتاب الحدود-الفصل الثالث-قسم التعزيز> Torturing little boys.
Needs an authentic source with context instead of a vague assertion.
You are only allowed to torture children if you bought them, so you can't torture children who were owned by others.
Asoori
The sane person in a world full of insane people will be called insane.
6 days ago#1402301
>Umm saaar that verse was misinterpreted
I mean Allah just used a common word that describes a child sex slave referring to little boys who serve you wines while comparing their look as pearls that been thrown on a bed in a wedding night, it's totally has nothing to do with sex with little boys and it's your fault for thinking it's a PDF thing!
fucking kafirs don't know anything about muh theology
I mean Allah just used a common word that describes a child sex slave referring to little boys who serve you wines while comparing their look as pearls that been thrown on a bed in a wedding night, it's totally has nothing to do with sex with little boys and it's your fault for thinking it's a PDF thing!
fucking kafirs don't know anything about muh theology
Asoori
The sane person in a world full of insane people will be called insane.
6 days ago#1402315
>
Why do you sub-human filth keep seething when I bring you something out of your own fucking books?! You and Christcucks and troons are in the same level.
You keep seething on me when I bring you something straight from your own fucking books, why seething on me? I didn't write this!
THAT IS FROM THE QURAN YOU FUCKING NIGGER!Many people have nothing but weak hadiths or completely made up hadith's. Like with the claim of how Shias build elephants from clay to fly to Mekkah.
Why do you sub-human filth keep seething when I bring you something out of your own fucking books?! You and Christcucks and troons are in the same level.
You keep seething on me when I bring you something straight from your own fucking books, why seething on me? I didn't write this!
6 days ago#1402374
I personally don't understand abortion. Yes for cases of sexual violation definitely allowed or if the woman is in dangerous health and not able to give birth then yes. But to the part of woman's health being in danger medical science can medicate those problems. Also to physical disorders in the child. 90% of those happen because of actions by the parents due to lack care into Eugenics and keeping their sperm quality clean along with not able to keep their health up. I don't agree with the part that parents deserve children. But instead i agree that children deserve parents.God i remember when i got stabbed during a argument about abortion. I said its murderShow quoted text
today i debated my siblings on abortion, they stormed off, and i told them "pack my luggage, you lose all debates son" irl
Asoori
The sane person in a world full of insane people will be called insane.
6 days ago#1402511
-Quryish was a tribe of fags
-Abu-Nawas, An Abbasid poet who writes love poems about little boys and he get rewarded for it, here is one of his disgusting poems (he been loved by them especially Harun al-Rashid and al-Ma'mun)
-You are allowed to torture little boys and girls only if you own them and don't leave a mark on them because their value will drop and the economy will get fucked as that the entire mudslime economy. just fag island
This is the only thing I can post.
Because if I posted the rest you gonna claim I advocate for 'P and get me banned just like last time when you banned me and claimed I posted porn on the forum.
So yeah.
I have more. way more disgusting shit that even Epstein would considers it fag shit.
-Abu-Nawas, An Abbasid poet who writes love poems about little boys and he get rewarded for it, here is one of his disgusting poems (he been loved by them especially Harun al-Rashid and al-Ma'mun)
-You are allowed to torture little boys and girls only if you own them and don't leave a mark on them because their value will drop and the economy will get fucked as that the entire mudslime economy. just fag island
This is the only thing I can post.
Because if I posted the rest you gonna claim I advocate for 'P and get me banned just like last time when you banned me and claimed I posted porn on the forum.
So yeah.
I have more. way more disgusting shit that even Epstein would considers it fag shit.
Asoori
The sane person in a world full of insane people will be called insane.
6 days ago#1402561
That the best part, it did but in a deep way.Kek this nigger thinks his religion is perfect. Of course they wont mention sex in a religious book idiot.
See the entire thread, he's just coping and asking for sources (even doe I gave him sources but he still ask for more)
Govnoje
Goy Rapellant
6 days ago#1402583
Yeah, not to mention it was written 1000 years ago in a shitskin muslalalala country. Does he really think im gonna believe this shit?That the best part, it did but in a deep way.Show quoted text
Kek this nigger thinks his religion is perfect. Of course they wont mention sex in a religious book idiot.
See the entire thread, he's just coping and asking for sources (even doe I gave him sources but he still ask for more)
Log in to reply to this thread.