"The Talmud supports child rape" debunked
The Talmud is the most comprehensive work of Rabbinic literature, comprising the written history of oral debates between rabbis spanning thousands of years. As part of this, every minority opinion is recorded under 'Elu ve-elu'. The Talmud's primary purpose is not to provide a codified legal work, but rather to study how to exercise debate and learn from intra-rabbinic disputes (makhloket).
>but muh specific passages in Sanhedrin!
These passages describe statements from Rabbis nearly 2,000 years ago, and they are not indicative of any modern scholarly opinion. Modern scholars and rabbis widely acknowledge these passages reflect ancient attitudes that are morally indefensible by contemporary standards. These age thresholds were never codified into normative law in regards to sexual contact, as Jewish law has always strictly prohibited any sexual activity with children. In many of these passages, you can see Rabbis object to the statements being exercised.
Although they are morally reprehensible, to sanitize them would go against the systematic purpose of the work and would betray intellectual honesty.
>b-but you're a Jew!
Yes, goy! You're very smart for noticing that!
Plus the vast majority of Jews haven't followed the Talmud in hundreds of years
>but muh specific passages in Sanhedrin!
These passages describe statements from Rabbis nearly 2,000 years ago, and they are not indicative of any modern scholarly opinion. Modern scholars and rabbis widely acknowledge these passages reflect ancient attitudes that are morally indefensible by contemporary standards. These age thresholds were never codified into normative law in regards to sexual contact, as Jewish law has always strictly prohibited any sexual activity with children. In many of these passages, you can see Rabbis object to the statements being exercised.
Although they are morally reprehensible, to sanitize them would go against the systematic purpose of the work and would betray intellectual honesty.
>b-but you're a Jew!
Yes, goy! You're very smart for noticing that!
Plus the vast majority of Jews haven't followed the Talmud in hundreds of years
11
6
6
4
1
1how come the elite end up doing it
2Nabbv
🇬🇧
Talmud is the biggest battleboard thread ever
11
what if it doesn't matter and I just hate jews
7aNuSoy
Checking the 'booru
The point is that the epistemic question is still left unanswered (because its an incoherent religion)
(Also unrelated to epistemology and what counts as authority but here: Read nigga read -> https://substack.com/home/post/p-156030609)
(Also unrelated to epistemology and what counts as authority but here: Read nigga read -> https://substack.com/home/post/p-156030609)
1Olgol
Enemy of the shriveled up nation (Shroom)
Gem and true
8shad
✹
snca
1
1
1Jableh
You don’t leave SoyBooru, SoyBooru leaves you
thanks for debunking these antisemitic liesThe Talmud is the most comprehensive work of Rabbinic literature, comprising the written history of oral debates between rabbis spanning thousands of years. As part of this, every minority opinion is recorded under 'Elu ve-elu'. The Talmud's primary purpose is not to provide a codified legal work, but rather to study how to exercise debate and learn from intra-rabbinic disputes (makhloket).
>but muh specific passages in Sanhedrin!
These passages describe statements from Rabbis nearly 2,000 years ago, and they are not indicative of any modern scholarly opinion. Modern scholars and rabbis widely acknowledge these passages reflect ancient attitudes that are morally indefensible by contemporary standards. These age thresholds were never codified into normative law in regards to sexual contact, as Jewish law has always strictly prohibited any sexual activity with children. In many of these passages, you can see Rabbis object to the statements being exercised.
Although they are morally reprehensible, to sanitize them would go against the systematic purpose of the work and would betray intellectual honesty.
>b-but you're a Jew!
Yes, goy! You're very smart for noticing that!
Plus the vast majority of Jews haven't followed the Talmud in hundreds of years
11GGF777
Watching gayniggers from outerspace
I didn't read
My Jewish friend told me the Talmud is basically just a large amount of recorded debates
222Some crazy rabbis some more normal
Kazakh_soy
Baiting people
SNCA.
Billinton
"There are no facts, only interpretations" maybe look a little closer or a little farther?
JEWS still have a long record of child sacrifice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passovers_of_Blood
Heres an example
>The book analyses a notorious medieval trial where the Jewish community was accused of murdering a child for ritual purposes as part of Passover.
>Because the book seemed to lend credence to one of the blood libels, it sparked intense controversy including calls for him to resign from or be fired from his professorship; the questioning of his research, historical method(s), and motives as they relate to his writing of the book; threats to his life; and demands that he be prosecuted.[2]
Book is by a jew btw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passovers_of_Blood
Heres an example
>The book analyses a notorious medieval trial where the Jewish community was accused of murdering a child for ritual purposes as part of Passover.
>Because the book seemed to lend credence to one of the blood libels, it sparked intense controversy including calls for him to resign from or be fired from his professorship; the questioning of his research, historical method(s), and motives as they relate to his writing of the book; threats to his life; and demands that he be prosecuted.[2]
Book is by a jew btw
Asoori
The sane person in a world full of insane people will be called insane.
Yeah, fake and made up historycomprising the written history of oral debates between rabbis spanning thousands of years.
I know, the Viagra been invinted to treat cardiovascular diseases and here we are.As part of this, every minority opinion is recorded under 'Elu ve-elu'. The Talmud's primary purpose is not to provide a codified legal work,
And they still used today.but rather to study how to exercise debate and learn from intra-rabbinic disputes (makhloket).
>but muh specific passages in Sanhedrin!
These passages describe statements from Rabbis nearly 2,000 years ago,
Did you just used the word morals?!and they are not indicative of any modern scholarly opinion. Modern scholars and rabbis widely acknowledge these passages reflect ancient attitudes that are morally indefensible by contemporary standards.
The laws of Israel came primary from the Torah, but the fact that the Knesset hold up a debate to discuss the pros and cons of raping prisoners tell me that the Talmud is the primary source of your "people" laws.These age thresholds were never codified into normative law in regards to sexual contact,
torturing an infant by cutting the tip of his penis and giving him a bloody blowjob isn't sexual activity? this isn't even a Talmudic law this been taken from the Torah (the good Jews)as Jewish law has always strictly prohibited any sexual activity with children.
>My bullshit Saturn worshiping religion contradicts itselfIn many of these passages, you can see Rabbis object to the statements being exercised.
Yeah I know xister.
GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGAlthough they are morally reprehensible, to sanitize them would go against the systematic purpose of the work and would betray intellectual honesty.
Yeah I had the hench that you're a Jew back when you defend rapist in my other thread, I am really shocked rn...>b-but you're a Jew!
Yes, goy! You're very smart for noticing that!
Plus the vast majority of Jews haven't followed the Talmud in hundreds of years
Olgol
Enemy of the shriveled up nation (Shroom)
It's just one case lmaoJEWS still have a long record of child sacrifice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passovers_of_Blood
Heres an example
>The book analyses a notorious medieval trial where the Jewish community was accused of murdering a child for ritual purposes as part of Passover.
>Because the book seemed to lend credence to one of the blood libels, it sparked intense controversy including calls for him to resign from or be fired from his professorship; the questioning of his research, historical method(s), and motives as they relate to his writing of the book; threats to his life; and demands that he be prosecuted.[2]
Book is by a jew btw
So much for that "long record"
Olgol
Enemy of the shriveled up nation (Shroom)
Seething pagancuck who worships rocks ^Yeah, fake and made up historyShow quoted text
comprising the written history of oral debates between rabbis spanning thousands of years.I know, the Viagra been invinted to treat cardiovascular diseases and here we are.Show quoted text
As part of this, every minority opinion is recorded under 'Elu ve-elu'. The Talmud's primary purpose is not to provide a codified legal work,And they still used today.Show quoted text
but rather to study how to exercise debate and learn from intra-rabbinic disputes (makhloket).
>but muh specific passages in Sanhedrin!
These passages describe statements from Rabbis nearly 2,000 years ago,Did you just used the word morals?!Show quoted text
and they are not indicative of any modern scholarly opinion. Modern scholars and rabbis widely acknowledge these passages reflect ancient attitudes that are morally indefensible by contemporary standards.The laws of Israel came primary from the Torah, but the fact that the Knesset hold up a debate to discuss the pros and cons of raping prisoners tell me that the Talmud is the primary source of your "people" laws.Show quoted text
These age thresholds were never codified into normative law in regards to sexual contact,torturing an infant by cutting the tip of his penis and giving him a bloody blowjob isn't sexual activity? this isn't even a Talmudic law this been taken from the Torah (the good Jews)Show quoted text
as Jewish law has always strictly prohibited any sexual activity with children.>My bullshit Saturn worshiping religion contradicts itselfShow quoted text
In many of these passages, you can see Rabbis object to the statements being exercised.
Yeah I know xister.GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGShow quoted text
Although they are morally reprehensible, to sanitize them would go against the systematic purpose of the work and would betray intellectual honesty.Yeah I had the hench that you're a Jew back when you defend rapist in my other thread, I am really shocked rn...Show quoted text
>b-but you're a Jew!
Yes, goy! You're very smart for noticing that!
Plus the vast majority of Jews haven't followed the Talmud in hundreds of years
idc + hating jews is aryan
Log in to reply to this thread.