Do Wojaks count?

52 replies·311 views
21 hours ago#418149
:neutral:I see some people posting Wojaks on the gallery but I’m confused, does that count to be approved or do they have to come with a soyjak?
/ 3
20 hours ago#418288
Bludd go to sleep blud its late :sleeping:
User avatar
Broot

Brootally Honest

20 hours ago#418296
Beniunverified
Broot
Show quoted text

And seeing your reply it took you strong effort just to approve that, which is a sign of a bad approver along with discouraging others for approving posts.
even if I didn’t like the post I didn’t refuse to approve it or delete it
But you did that with the posts you pinged me on
20 hours ago#418297(edited 20 hours ago)
Beni
Broot
Show quoted text
Beni
Show quoted text
Since I wanted to have some fun, I tagged you and made a slight joke calling you a horny dog. But that’s about it
Beni
Show quoted text
Post #205584
The post I’m mostly referring to

And seeing your reply it took you strong effort just to approve that, which is a sign of a bad approver along with discouraging others for approving posts.
In what way does this proves you right?
It only proves me more right because that’s what I’m trying to say, even if I didn’t like the post I didn’t refuse to approve it or delete it
Matter of fact @Broot, when I approve that post, it mysteriously vanished/disappeared, but after a few minutes it came back up and then someone interesting said something

the person who is STILL an approver right now, refused to approve it because he didn’t like it
19 hours ago#418305
Broot
Beni
Show quoted text
even if I didn’t like the post I didn’t refuse to approve it or delete it
But you did that with the posts you pinged me on
I didn’t, like i said I approved it and then I saw that YOU approved it so I decided to have a laugh
User avatar
Broot

Brootally Honest

19 hours ago#418318
Beni
Broot
Show quoted text
But you did that with the posts you pinged me on
I didn’t, like i said I approved it and then I saw that YOU approved it so I decided to have a laugh
You didn't approve anything because it would say so on the logs, and as an approver you shouldnt be laughing at people for approving
aaaand conversations over
19 hours ago#418330
Broot
Beni
Show quoted text
I didn’t, like i said I approved it and then I saw that YOU approved it so I decided to have a laugh
You didn't approve anything because it would say so on the logs, and as an approver you shouldnt be laughing at people for approving
aaaand conversations over
>Post #204789 fock you for laughing at me that’s against the magical rules I made up on the spot. Conversation is OVER NUSOI!!
User avatar
DOCTOOOOOOOOOSmutt

DOOOOCTOOOOOOOOOOOES WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SECTION QUOTE UNDO THIS DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCTOS

19 hours ago#418340
I mean, doesn't every employee complain about things in the first day of their job? They're gonna suck it up later on.
>discouraging others for approving posts
Who are they discouraging? Literally nobody gives a shit of someone whining about their approvals, unless they're secretly snowflakes in a fucking 4cuck splinter imageboard of bald men with glasses.
19 hours ago#418344
DOCTOOOOOOOOOSmutt
I mean, doesn't every employee complain about things in the first day of their job? They're gonna suck it up later on.
>discouraging others for approving posts
Who are they discouraging? Literally nobody gives a shit of someone whining about their approvals, unless they're secretly snowflakes in a fucking 4cuck splinter imageboard of bald men with glasses.
Meh yeah. But I just hate the fact I’m being accused of something I didn’t even do
User avatar
Broot

Brootally Honest

19 hours ago#418402
DOCTOOOOOOOOOSmutt
I mean, doesn't every employee complain about things in the first day of their job? They're gonna suck it up later on.
>discouraging others for approving posts
Who are they discouraging? Literally nobody gives a shit of someone whining about their approvals, unless they're secretly snowflakes in a fucking 4cuck splinter imageboard of bald men with glasses.
>make me an approver pls
>sees 9 posts in the queue
>waits for someone else to approve them
>pings them like a retard for approving posts
What's the point of keeping people like that
User avatar
Funnybenny18

Mercenary For Hire

19 hours ago#418414(edited 19 hours ago)
I Believe That You Didn't Actually Intend To Make A Big Fuss About Approving A Post You Didn't Like, You Were Probably Joking About It
But The Decision Was Made Because It Was The Second Strike:

First Strike Was The Supreme Post, Which Could Be Read As "Gosh... Us Approvers Have To Approve Posts We Don't Like... Ugh" (What Broot Mentions As Discouraging), Which Wasn't Grounds For Demotion

The Second Strike Was The Tongue In Cheek Comment About Broot Approving An Image. Your Joke Came Off More Accusatory Than Just Joking. Even If That Wasn't The Intention, That's What Was Assumed. You Can't Really Assume Tone Or Attitude From Text Alone: You Thought It Was More Joking, But It's Just As Likely To Be Read As Accusatory.

That's What I Gather From This...
User avatar
DOCTOOOOOOOOOSmutt

DOOOOCTOOOOOOOOOOOES WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SECTION QUOTE UNDO THIS DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCTOS

19 hours ago#418425
Okay, benny has a good point
Post #333
User avatar
Jableh

JSID

19 hours ago#418455
Yes
19 hours ago#418475
Funnybenny18
I Believe That You Didn't Actually Intend To Make A Big Fuss About Approving A Post You Didn't Like, You Were Probably Joking About It
But The Decision Was Made Because It Was The Second Strike:
First Strike Was The Supreme Post, Which Could Be Read As "Gosh... Us Approvers Have To Approve Posts We Don't Like... Ugh" (What Broot Mentions As Discouraging), Which Wasn't Grounds For Demotion
The Second Strike Was The Tongue In Cheek Comment About Broot Approving An Image. Your Joke Came Off More Accusatory Than Just Joking. Even If That Wasn't The Intention, That's What Was Assumed. You Can't Really Assume Tone Or Attitude From Text Alone: You Thought It Was More Joking, But It's Just As Likely To Be Read As Accusatory.
That's What I Gather From This...
Post #202396
/ 3
Log in to reply to this thread.