2 weeks ago#2317638
soyvankek
Be back soon.
2 weeks ago#2317642
>Take notes @cobblestone
>Each header that's added in a page, the person who made it must add an additional 45+ words with relevant information + wittiness to prevent coal pages. If someone wants to make an article about a namefag; it must have 200+ words with relevant information. Namefag pages are very important because if a nuGQD comes to any of the 'sphere sites and see SECA namefag drama, they'll most likely have no idea what they're talking about, it's also just really good to know about who the notable namefags are in the 'sphere because you get to know more about them and not be left out of the loop.
>If a page about a namefag has: for example:
>The "faggot template". There must be 45 or more words that explain and elaborate on why that is. Each template that's added to an article must stack and add an additional 5 or more words that increases exponentially for each template.
>For example:
>Faggot template: 45+ words
>Pedophile template: 45+ words and an additional +5 words
>Disturbing criminal template: 45+ words and an additional 10+ WORDS
<'dit space to make this readable
>This project will eradicate ALL HTSM 'KI USERS BY MAKING THEM PUT IN MORE EFFORT IN THEIR FUCKIN PAGGGEEEEESSS
>META-WHINING IS ARYAN BTW, IF THAT MATTERS
2 weeks ago#2317645
2 weeks ago#2317719
Namefag pages should also have categories that provide even more information. If you're gonna make a namefag article, you should research their activity in any or all of the sites they're in and add it to your article.
I'm not gonna contribute to this because I'm a eslGQD
I'm not gonna contribute to this because I'm a eslGQD
2 weeks ago#2317731
What was the purpose of thisShow quoted text
>Take notes @cobblestone
>Each header that's added in a page, the person who made it must add an additional 45+ words with relevant information + wittiness to prevent coal pages. If someone wants to make an article about a namefag; it must have 200+ words with relevant information. Namefag pages are very important because if a nuGQD comes to any of the 'sphere sites and see SECA namefag drama, they'll most likely have no idea what they're talking about, it's also just really good to know about who the notable namefags are in the 'sphere because you get to know more about them and not be left out of the loop.
>If a page about a namefag has: for example:
>The "faggot template". There must be 45 or more words that explain and elaborate on why that is. Each template that's added to an article must stack and add an additional 5 or more words that increases exponentially for each template.
>For example:
>Faggot template: 45+ words
>Pedophile template: 45+ words and an additional +5 words
>Disturbing criminal template: 45+ words and an additional 10+ WORDS
<'dit space to make this readable
>This project will eradicate ALL HTSM 'KI USERS BY MAKING THEM PUT IN MORE EFFORT IN THEIR FUCKIN PAGGGEEEEESSS
>META-WHINING IS ARYAN BTW, IF THAT MATTERS
werbell_iii
SOLDATY BEZ GRANITS
2 weeks ago#2317736
BruhShow quoted text
>Take notes @cobblestone
>Each header that's added in a page, the person who made it must add an additional 45+ words with relevant information + wittiness to prevent coal pages. If someone wants to make an article about a namefag; it must have 200+ words with relevant information. Namefag pages are very important because if a nuGQD comes to any of the 'sphere sites and see SECA namefag drama, they'll most likely have no idea what they're talking about, it's also just really good to know about who the notable namefags are in the 'sphere because you get to know more about them and not be left out of the loop.
>If a page about a namefag has: for example:
>The "faggot template". There must be 45 or more words that explain and elaborate on why that is. Each template that's added to an article must stack and add an additional 5 or more words that increases exponentially for each template.
>For example:
>Faggot template: 45+ words
>Pedophile template: 45+ words and an additional +5 words
>Disturbing criminal template: 45+ words and an additional 10+ WORDS
<'dit space to make this readable
>This project will eradicate ALL HTSM 'KI USERS BY MAKING THEM PUT IN MORE EFFORT IN THEIR FUCKIN PAGGGEEEEESSS
>META-WHINING IS ARYAN BTW, IF THAT MATTERS
soyvankek
Be back soon.
2 weeks ago#2317741
>What was the purpose of thisShow quoted text
Show quoted text
>Take notes @cobblestone
>Each header that's added in a page, the person who made it must add an additional 45+ words with relevant information + wittiness to prevent coal pages. If someone wants to make an article about a namefag; it must have 200+ words with relevant information. Namefag pages are very important because if a nuGQD comes to any of the 'sphere sites and see SECA namefag drama, they'll most likely have no idea what they're talking about, it's also just really good to know about who the notable namefags are in the 'sphere because you get to know more about them and not be left out of the loop.
>If a page about a namefag has: for example:
>The "faggot template". There must be 45 or more words that explain and elaborate on why that is. Each template that's added to an article must stack and add an additional 5 or more words that increases exponentially for each template.
>For example:
>Faggot template: 45+ words
>Pedophile template: 45+ words and an additional +5 words
>Disturbing criminal template: 45+ words and an additional 10+ WORDS
<'dit space to make this readable
>This project will eradicate ALL HTSM 'KI USERS BY MAKING THEM PUT IN MORE EFFORT IN THEIR FUCKIN PAGGGEEEEESSS
>META-WHINING IS ARYAN BTW, IF THAT MATTERS
2 weeks ago#2317768
BVMP
2 weeks ago#2317845
2 weeks ago#2317848
2 weeks ago#2317862
How many people are in the 'ki staff? How many of them are active users?it's a good idea but kind of hard to enforce, the wiki is built up with many retarded editors adding small bits of knowledge then one good editor compiling and factchecking it all. i learned its hard to expect quality from the start
2 weeks ago#2317864
check special:usersHow many people are in the 'ki staff? How many of them are active users?Show quoted text
it's a good idea but kind of hard to enforce, the wiki is built up with many retarded editors adding small bits of knowledge then one good editor compiling and factchecking it all. i learned its hard to expect quality from the start