Question regarding animal abuse and gore.
Why is Gore allowed while animal abuse is prohibited?
Does a animal dignity worth more that our fellow human beings?
I don't prefer one over the other at all; in fact, I condemn both, but I want to know why contemporary morality (if there is such a thing nowadays) has this narrative.
>
Does a animal dignity worth more that our fellow human beings?
I don't prefer one over the other at all; in fact, I condemn both, but I want to know why contemporary morality (if there is such a thing nowadays) has this narrative.
>
214lesothowon88
wew, anyways what were you saying?
im guessing maybe the animals that can be abused are typically more innocent than the average human
Animals do not reason, so they lack ethical standards, which leads to a lack of morality; they are also quite opportunistic, so they will kill any of their victims if it suits them. In fact, certain studies document animal behavior and reveal unnecessary cruelty and brutality in killing, unlike the typical human being, who today slaughters animals using the least painful methods ever devised.im guessing maybe the animals that can be abused are typically more innocent than the average human
But what about the DNB case? He was just a child—clearly an innocent human being—and yet his death has been the subject of repeated mockery and desecration, taken to these extremes.
5
Context for the dead nigger baby:
The name of the macheted child is Sitsofe Abotsi. He was murdered in Kpeyiborme, in the Volta region of Ghana on June 18, 2014. He was killed by his father, Gideon "Jarah" Abotsi, after his wife refused to have sex with him. Snopes: https://megalodon.jp/2026-0713-0312-57/https://www.graphic.com.gh:443/news/general-news/man-slashes-son-s-throat-over-sex-denial-by-wife.html
The name of the macheted child is Sitsofe Abotsi. He was murdered in Kpeyiborme, in the Volta region of Ghana on June 18, 2014. He was killed by his father, Gideon "Jarah" Abotsi, after his wife refused to have sex with him. Snopes: https://megalodon.jp/2026-0713-0312-57/https://www.graphic.com.gh:443/news/general-news/man-slashes-son-s-throat-over-sex-denial-by-wife.html
Jones
trans rights are human rights! soyjak porn. i am the next nulee. gore spam
you could kind of compare it to racial jokes not being okay outside of a certain race. saying nigger as someone who isnt a black person isnt socially acceptable. in this case, you could say that gore of other human beings is somewhat okay since it involves other human beings but gore of animals isnt.Animals do not reason, so they lack ethical standards, which leads to a lack of morality; they are also quite opportunistic, so they will kill any of their victims if it suits them. In fact, certain studies document animal behavior and reveal unnecessary cruelty and brutality in killing, unlike the typical human being, who today slaughters animals using the least painful methods ever devised.Show quoted text
im guessing maybe the animals that can be abused are typically more innocent than the average human
But what about the DNB case? He was just a child—clearly an innocent human being—and yet his death has been the subject of repeated mockery and desecration, taken to these extremes.
also most animal torture imagery involves common pets and most pets, like cats, are innocent. they appear "cute" in the eyes of humans and that could contribute to why people condemn animal abuse.
>and yet his death has been the subject of repeated mockery and desecration, taken to these extremes.
only monsters mock his death, most people either dont care or condemn it
Jones
trans rights are human rights! soyjak porn. i am the next nulee. gore spam
also animal abuse imagery, like dee en bee, is illegal in certain countries. it might be a matter of law and not morals or ethics.
1bump
helichadian
CAPE VERDE WON
animal abuse is illegal in more countries than common gore
PuertoRican
I am sorry to those I treated unjustly here.
I don't like either type of this gore, and I agree that the life of a person is worth much more than the life of an animal, but if I were to guess why one is prohibited while the other is not, maybe it is because it is easier to kill an animal without repercussions?Animals do not reason, so they lack ethical standards, which leads to a lack of morality; they are also quite opportunistic, so they will kill any of their victims if it suits them. In fact, certain studies document animal behavior and reveal unnecessary cruelty and brutality in killing, unlike the typical human being, who today slaughters animals using the least painful methods ever devised.Show quoted text
im guessing maybe the animals that can be abused are typically more innocent than the average human
But what about the DNB case? He was just a child—clearly an innocent human being—and yet his death has been the subject of repeated mockery and desecration, taken to these extremes.
Log in to reply to this thread.