make SNCAPEDIA a hostile website

amogusimposter↗

@Quote

Don't you think she knows about this place?

Banning the only place that gives a somewhat neutral viewpoint is not a good look

Abelian↗

Banning the only place that gives a somewhat neutral viewpoint is not a good look

we're making a new one

amogusimposter↗

Abelian↗

Show quoted text

Banning the only place that gives a somewhat neutral viewpoint is not a good look

we're making a new one

why? what’s the point?

What the fuck are you talking about, meds

Abelian↗

amogusimposter↗

Show quoted text

Abelian↗

Show quoted text

Banning the only place that gives a somewhat neutral viewpoint is not a good look

we're making a new one

why? what’s the point?

me and north and marketpliers linked up to make sncapedia but gooder without failtrolls, cacas, and sperging 'tards

amogusimposter↗

Abelian↗

Show quoted text

why? what’s the point?

me and north and marketpliers linked up to make sncapedia but gooder without failtrolls, cacas, and sperging 'tards

i can’t imagine there will be much user base for a splinter of a splinter of a wiki, especially if it has basically the same information as it. if you want a more rulescucked version of sncapedia, just use the sharty wiki. the problems you list are not as bad as you make them seem.

amogusimposter↗

Abelian↗

Show quoted text

Banning the only place that gives a somewhat neutral viewpoint is not a good look

we're making a new one

So basically you want to kill your competition before you've even started?

isnt it just soyjak wikipedia??

I'm not gonna tell you what or what not to do, you do you

Vashkentya↗

amogusimposter↗

Show quoted text

@Quote

Don't you think she knows about this place?

Thanks for using xer real pronouns

Unscerost↗

Vashkentya↗

Show quoted text

amogusimposter↗

Show quoted text

@Quote

Don't you think she knows about this place?

Thanks for using xer real pronouns

Her*

amogusimposter↗

>The owner is banned sitewide
>openly calls the quote adminstration pedophiles
>took too long to ban chinnyfails
>has a shit ton of cp archive links that they don't check
>half the userbase is cacas, the other are failtrolls documenting themselves

The owner is banned because nobody wants to ban the person behind the suggestive baby jak material and he spammed the forums because of it. Of course people are gonna be mad about it, what do you expect? Failtrolls are banned majority of the time, if not all the time. Only when people started bringing up how the chinny was genuinely unmoderated and full of awful people did they actually start removing all links to it. I also don't know what archive links you're referring to, but if you see them, go email the admins and mods of that site if you can instead of just standing there. Those are my two cents though.

Also stop worshipping admins. Quote is gonna end up shutting down everything in like, 2 to 3 years anyway.

ban everything i don't like. ban everyone i don't like. ban everyone i disagree with. ban everything my favourite janny doesn't like. mods = gods