make SNCAPEDIA a hostile website
amogusimposter
Analects Chapter 1 Line 6
>The owner is banned sitewide
>openly calls the quote adminstration pedophiles
>took too long to ban chinnyfails
>has a shit ton of cp archive links that they don't check
>half the userbase is cacas, the other are failtrolls documenting themselves
>openly calls the quote adminstration pedophiles
>took too long to ban chinnyfails
>has a shit ton of cp archive links that they don't check
>half the userbase is cacas, the other are failtrolls documenting themselves
17
11
6
4
4
4amogusimposter
Analects Chapter 1 Line 6
Onzikn
From /soyresearch/
Who cares>The owner is banned sitewide
Stop worshipping admins>openly calls the quote adminstration pedophiles
Valid point>took too long to ban chinnyfails
Not true at all>has a shit ton of cp archive links that they don't check
Valid point, but failtrolls are banned often>half the userbase is cacas, the other are failtrolls documenting themselves
12
2
Banning the only place that gives a somewhat neutral viewpoint is not a good look
2amogusimposter
Analects Chapter 1 Line 6
we're making a new oneBanning the only place that gives a somewhat neutral viewpoint is not a good look
Coalimero
Racists reported: 17
What the fuck are you talking about, meds
amogusimposter
Analects Chapter 1 Line 6
i can’t imagine there will be much user base for a splinter of a splinter of a wiki, especially if it has basically the same information as it. if you want a more rulescucked version of sncapedia, just use the sharty wiki. the problems you list are not as bad as you make them seem.me and north and marketpliers linked up to make sncapedia but gooder without failtrolls, cacas, and sperging 'tardsShow quoted text
why? what’s the point?
PuertoRican
I am sorry to those I treated unjustly here.
olgolistheshitskin
im a nusoi in this strange world
isnt it just soyjak wikipedia??
PuertoRican
I am sorry to those I treated unjustly here.
I'm not gonna tell you what or what not to do, you do you
no need to, it's a wikipedia for you know what, it's in the name
76Vale
(⸸) | Ark of the Covenant
The owner is banned because nobody wants to ban the person behind the suggestive baby jak material and he spammed the forums because of it. Of course people are gonna be mad about it, what do you expect? Failtrolls are banned majority of the time, if not all the time. Only when people started bringing up how the chinny was genuinely unmoderated and full of awful people did they actually start removing all links to it. I also don't know what archive links you're referring to, but if you see them, go email the admins and mods of that site if you can instead of just standing there. Those are my two cents though.>The owner is banned sitewide
>openly calls the quote adminstration pedophiles
>took too long to ban chinnyfails
>has a shit ton of cp archive links that they don't check
>half the userbase is cacas, the other are failtrolls documenting themselves
Vale
(⸸) | Ark of the Covenant
Also stop worshipping admins. Quote is gonna end up shutting down everything in like, 2 to 3 years anyway.
1ban everything i don't like. ban everyone i don't like. ban everyone i disagree with. ban everything my favourite janny doesn't like. mods = gods
2
Who hasn't been?>The owner is banned sitewide
Who doesn't?>openly calls the quote adminstration pedophiles
People have a life>took too long to ban chinnyfails
Meds>has a shit ton of cp archive links that they don't check
Just like the sharty>half the userbase is cacas, the other are failtrolls documenting themselves
88Log in to reply to this thread.