Mustard, you are not capable of moderating this website.
>You allow the creation of referendums and voluntarily give up part of your authority so users can decide certain rules.
>You actively encourage the system by publishing the referendum creation process.
>You approve the creation of a Senate to oversee referendums.
>You leave its purpose and authority vaguely defined, practically ruining the system because you failed to write a proper constitution with clear objectives for the Senate.
>I try to fix that by helping you write a constitution, but instead of answering my questions or discussing it with me, you tell me to post it in the senators' group so they can decide.
>Then you make a vague five-sentence announcement on /meta/, acting as if that were enough instead of waiting for me, you, and maybe the rest of the Senate to draft something together that would actually bring order to the system.
>Finally, you throw the whole thing away for being "inefficient," even though you were the one who made it that way by refusing to stay involved or discuss these ideas with the people who actually keep the site running.
How did Quote ever leave you as the site's sole admin?
Make up your mind. Either you're going to make all the decisions yourself, or you're not. Stop creating useless systems that last a single week and fall apart because you can't communicate clearly or discuss ideas with the people who make your site function. @custard.
>You actively encourage the system by publishing the referendum creation process.
>You approve the creation of a Senate to oversee referendums.
>You leave its purpose and authority vaguely defined, practically ruining the system because you failed to write a proper constitution with clear objectives for the Senate.
>I try to fix that by helping you write a constitution, but instead of answering my questions or discussing it with me, you tell me to post it in the senators' group so they can decide.
>Then you make a vague five-sentence announcement on /meta/, acting as if that were enough instead of waiting for me, you, and maybe the rest of the Senate to draft something together that would actually bring order to the system.
>Finally, you throw the whole thing away for being "inefficient," even though you were the one who made it that way by refusing to stay involved or discuss these ideas with the people who actually keep the site running.
How did Quote ever leave you as the site's sole admin?
Make up your mind. Either you're going to make all the decisions yourself, or you're not. Stop creating useless systems that last a single week and fall apart because you can't communicate clearly or discuss ideas with the people who make your site function. @custard.
33
26
2
1
1
1
1
It was created by the people that voted it in I would blame democracy
10Mymykiller1488
I am not racist! I just hate niggas.And i like fpe and talk about it with tiquan and Wooski.
Mustard is so retarded. Also isn't shroot the other admin
7Mymykiller1488
I am not racist! I just hate niggas.And i like fpe and talk about it with tiquan and Wooski.
Also isn't shenvaly the admin of poopyineedaspanking.metawhining or ketchup took xer positionMustard is so retarded. Also isn't shroot the other admin
weren't referendums cobble's idea?
mustard pron
No, it was his @muscular_engineerweren't referendums cobble's idea?
Mymykiller1488
I am not racist! I just hate niggas.And i like fpe and talk about it with tiquan and Wooski.
It was the idea of a anon from bothnia in soyak.ircweren't referendums cobble's idea?
Mymykiller1488
I am not racist! I just hate niggas.And i like fpe and talk about it with tiquan and Wooski.
I brag about muscular engineer badge i haveNo, it was his @muscular_engineerShow quoted text
weren't referendums cobble's idea?
the senate was his ideaNo, it was his @muscular_engineerShow quoted text
weren't referendums cobble's idea?
If he had the authority to scrap the whole thing, he should've done it before if he knew he wasn't capable of moderating it properly. He literally did exactly that when he removed Gold from the position. On top of that, I offered to help, and he completely ignored it. It's he's fault for being lazy and don't trust me or any senator.It was created by the people that voted it in I would blame democracy
Prince_Narcissist
Prince of Soybooru / Coq aout in public fuqqqing 333 girls / Sexiest person on the soysphere
Fire this hunky and then give me approver again
snca
no bodey cares
1
11mdl owns you blud
womp womp
But I AM!!
2
2
22
22You should be glad he allows you to moderate this site lil bro. If it was me I'd fire you for disrespect ngl
5
1
1
1if you get demoted ill never get approver>You allow the creation of referendums and voluntarily give up part of your authority so users can decide certain rules.
>You actively encourage the system by publishing the referendum creation process.
>You approve the creation of a Senate to oversee referendums.
>You leave its purpose and authority vaguely defined, practically ruining the system because you failed to write a proper constitution with clear objectives for the Senate.
>I try to fix that by helping you write a constitution, but instead of answering my questions or discussing it with me, you tell me to post it in the senators' group so they can decide.
>Then you make a vague five-sentence announcement on /meta/, acting as if that were enough instead of waiting for me, you, and maybe the rest of the Senate to draft something together that would actually bring order to the system.
>Finally, you throw the whole thing away for being "inefficient," even though you were the one who made it that way by refusing to stay involved or discuss these ideas with the people who actually keep the site running.
How did Quote ever leave you as the site's sole admin?
Make up your mind. Either you're going to make all the decisions yourself, or you're not. Stop creating useless systems that last a single week and fall apart because you can't communicate clearly or discuss ideas with the people who make your site function. @custard.
coem!Log in to reply to this thread.