Referendum Rework & Senators
I have decided that referendums need an overhaul if senators are to do anything useful, and that this will massively simplify what they can and cannot do.
Referendums must separately be for changing rules on the forum and the booru separately as they function as two distinct things. I am wiping all previous referendums as null and void.
Referendum voting will now be done through senator votes, and senators should explain why they are saying yes or no to a referendum in a thread. They can also side with popular opinion if they so choose.
Referendums differentiating the forum and the booru should be created with titles stating [forum] and [booru] seperately.
If a referendum is created with popular votes in mind, the senators have the power to override the opinion, but they can also choose to side with the popular vote.
I also have the power to dissolve the senate at-will and nullify referendums as needed.
Useless referendums such as ban (x) person will not be regarded.
5
4
4
2Ok
Is smuglet still banned on the gallery? Mostly asking out of curiosity
What about people who were banned in the past due to referendums?
All the other users I dont care about but gooner is the only one i want gone forever
More related to the actual post, does this mean that popular votes on referendums are mostly a formality and senators have the final say on these matters?
Im sure we will make another anti gooner rule soon anyway and then she will get permad again, here's hoping.
So no shitter referendums about banning people or giving people roles?
Olgol
Enemy of the shriveled up nation (Shroom)
1
1
1
Log in to reply to this thread.