Referendum: Ban Fetish Content Involving Childlike Characters
After babyjak 'p got banned, people started to post fat fetish content involving babyjak, we should not let them evade the rules like this
Its time to get rid of the babyjak fat fetish content,
If this voting passes, rule 15 will get added:
RULE 15: Do not post any sort of fetish content involving childlike characters/or any variants with child-like characteristics (Example; Babyjak).
Its time to get rid of the babyjak fat fetish content,
If this voting passes, rule 15 will get added:
RULE 15: Do not post any sort of fetish content involving childlike characters/or any variants with child-like characteristics (Example; Babyjak).
People who vote yes you're idiotic lmao
That's already a rule
rule central
Who do you call idiotic, special?People who vote yes you're idiotic lmao
Get rid of the refurendum feature.
There's a reason you guys aren't admins.
There's a reason you guys aren't admins.

Y'know, we wouldn't have this problem if you stopped clittyleaking over it and let it die naturally 

The problem is that this is not how moderators moderate. WE take an "innocent until proven guilty" approach and is why Babyjak 'P was allowed for so long, because it could easily be argued that Babyjak is just a joke, and babyjak having a beard is shows that they're an adult and that it's completely allowed.
the rule covers this special it's just that mods refuse to enforce it





THIS!Y'know, we wouldn't have this problem if you stopped clittyleaking over it and let it die naturally
Its traced off bernd Schmidt a 50 year old fat German
rip half of the sites activityY'know, we wouldn't have this problem if you stopped clittyleaking over it and let it die naturally
Dangerous ideaY'know, we wouldn't have this problem if you stopped clittyleaking over it and let it die naturally
Log in to reply to this thread.






















