Referendum: Ban Suggestive Babyjak/Caca Content
A trend I, and a good majority of this site's considering the ratings, am really sick and tired of seeing is Babyjak porn.
Prior to this, Babyjak was depicted as a non-figurative child. Whether it's bait or not, I feel like it's getting to a point of ironypoisoning.
If this referendum is added, Rule 2 will be amended to include the posting of suggestive art of characters with childlike characteristics as an offense.
<reddit space
Rule 2: Do not upload, post, or promote pedophilic content, including suggestive depictions of characters with certain deliberate childlike characteristics (For example; Babyjak).
Prior to this, Babyjak was depicted as a non-figurative child. Whether it's bait or not, I feel like it's getting to a point of ironypoisoning.
If this referendum is added, Rule 2 will be amended to include the posting of suggestive art of characters with childlike characteristics as an offense.
<reddit space
Rule 2: Do not upload, post, or promote pedophilic content, including suggestive depictions of characters with certain deliberate childlike characteristics (For example; Babyjak).
- Posting, promoting, or using suggestive child implied content: Week->Month->Permanent
Ban suggestive Babyjak content
Yes218 (90.8%)
No22 (9.2%)
is this formatted right? 

bump

I think that you should add 'or any variants with child-like characteristics'. Also add escalating punishments for breaking the ruleis this formatted right?
fixed
bvmp
no way we're still leaking over this shit
i'm not mad per se but it's really weird and grossno way we're still leaking over this shit
Give babyjak 'p posters bottom surgery so they are forced to be a tranny forever
that's the equivalent to evolving a pokemon, have you lost your mindGive babyjak 'p posters bottom surgery so they are forced to be a tranny forever
drawn 'p but soyjaks
drawn 'p but soyjaks

final bump of the night.
Log in to reply to this thread.



