Funnybenny18
COVENANT
1 week ago#624777
I Read It And It's The Same Point Over And Over Again. Just Because Froot And Doll Interpreted Babyjak As A Caca Doesn't Make It Definite. Doll Considered 'Lita Non-Offensive For A While. Would You Consider That Opinion Now?Dude i am not reading any of this i don't fucking care about this shitShow quoted text
you know what we mean retard LOL
This is like calling criminals "human fucking beings" libtard logic. Or "u just hate black people because of their SKIN and nothing else".
Because before the gif of the spade caca twerking, the context of babyjak was he was a child. Everyone knew this, unless you want to twist history and context.
This is like saying "why are people calling soyjaks soyboys? It's just a man with a stubble". No everyone knows it's supposed to depict something, especially in the context of SOYJAK PARTY it's supposed to be a fucking soyboy.
This is also what makes languages distinct from each other. The word "Nigga" means a black person in English while in China "Ni Ge" means something else. And
Nabbv will even argue that this isn't true because "if you show it to someone else on normienet they will say X", first of all that's not true and even if it was it doesn't matter because we all knew it's a child on soyjakl party
Caca is also a character, and a word to describe actual kids. Between 2022 and 2026 we would call all children "cacas", referring to the cacajaks. It's also a substitute for soylita and shoyta because it was sexualized so much.
If you said in 2024 "Holy shit I want to FUCK that caca" you would get banned, for being a paedophile. Same as saying you wanted to fuck cacajak. You fuckers just decided to hide the fact it's paedophilic by saying it suddenly means something else.
But now you take the opportunity to twist the meaning of cacajak and say it's not paedophilic, because you've realized people won't get banned for it. Just another reason why you fuckers stand on nothing. All these "Abdl" arguments are irrelevant because context exists.
If you drew caca, everyone knew it meant a kid, and since youve used the website for a long time, you know it. But you discovered you can just say "it's actually Abdl guys because they did that briefly in 2023".
You dont admit that of course, that would get you banned lol.
There is zero arguments.
pepsi47
It's Saint Pepsi bitch.
1 week ago#624790
you replied doe, you careDude i am not reading any of this i don't fucking care about this shitShow quoted text
you know what we mean retard LOLShow quoted text
How is the soyjak with a dummy in it's mouth and a beard pedophilic
When we make fun of adults who age regress, are we now projecting pedophiles for jakking them aswell???
This is like calling criminals "human fucking beings" libtard logic. Or "u just hate black people because of their SKIN and nothing else".
Because before the gif of the spade caca twerking, the context of babyjak was he was a child. Everyone knew this, unless you want to twist history and context.
This is like saying "why are people calling soyjaks soyboys? It's just a man with a stubble". No everyone knows it's supposed to depict something, especially in the context of SOYJAK PARTY it's supposed to be a fucking soyboy.
This is also what makes languages distinct from each other. The word "Nigga" means a black person in English while in China "Ni Ge" means something else. And
Nabbv will even argue that this isn't true because "if you show it to someone else on normienet they will say X", first of all that's not true and even if it was it doesn't matter because we all knew it's a child on soyjakl party
Caca is also a character, and a word to describe actual kids. Between 2022 and 2026 we would call all children "cacas", referring to the cacajaks. It's also a substitute for soylita and shoyta because it was sexualized so much.
If you said in 2024 "Holy shit I want to FUCK that caca" you would get banned, for being a paedophile. Same as saying you wanted to fuck cacajak. You fuckers just decided to hide the fact it's paedophilic by saying it suddenly means something else.
But now you take the opportunity to twist the meaning of cacajak and say it's not paedophilic, because you've realized people won't get banned for it. Just another reason why you fuckers stand on nothing. All these "Abdl" arguments are irrelevant because context exists.
If you drew caca, everyone knew it meant a kid, and since youve used the website for a long time, you know it. But you discovered you can just say "it's actually Abdl guys because they did that briefly in 2023".
You dont admit that of course, that would get you banned lol.
There is zero arguments.
XX_IwajuGoyim_XX
gigafly, gigawhy? gigaflies so gigahigh!
1 week ago#624803
who CARES what the admins thinkI Read It And It's The Same Point Over And Over Again. Just Because Froot And Doll Interpreted Babyjak As A Caca Doesn't Make It Definite. Doll Considered 'Lita Non-Offensive For A While. Would You Consider That Opinion Now?Show quoted text
Dude i am not reading any of this i don't fucking care about this shitShow quoted text
you know what we mean retard LOL
This is like calling criminals "human fucking beings" libtard logic. Or "u just hate black people because of their SKIN and nothing else".
Because before the gif of the spade caca twerking, the context of babyjak was he was a child. Everyone knew this, unless you want to twist history and context.
This is like saying "why are people calling soyjaks soyboys? It's just a man with a stubble". No everyone knows it's supposed to depict something, especially in the context of SOYJAK PARTY it's supposed to be a fucking soyboy.
This is also what makes languages distinct from each other. The word "Nigga" means a black person in English while in China "Ni Ge" means something else. And
Nabbv will even argue that this isn't true because "if you show it to someone else on normienet they will say X", first of all that's not true and even if it was it doesn't matter because we all knew it's a child on soyjakl party
Caca is also a character, and a word to describe actual kids. Between 2022 and 2026 we would call all children "cacas", referring to the cacajaks. It's also a substitute for soylita and shoyta because it was sexualized so much.
If you said in 2024 "Holy shit I want to FUCK that caca" you would get banned, for being a paedophile. Same as saying you wanted to fuck cacajak. You fuckers just decided to hide the fact it's paedophilic by saying it suddenly means something else.
But now you take the opportunity to twist the meaning of cacajak and say it's not paedophilic, because you've realized people won't get banned for it. Just another reason why you fuckers stand on nothing. All these "Abdl" arguments are irrelevant because context exists.
If you drew caca, everyone knew it meant a kid, and since youve used the website for a long time, you know it. But you discovered you can just say "it's actually Abdl guys because they did that briefly in 2023".
You dont admit that of course, that would get you banned lol.
There is zero arguments.
popular opinion triumphs over all (usually)
Paranoid
Quis furor, ô nuswa!
1 week ago#624814
I think the whole thing is just another vector to bait people which is why i think no one making this stuff is taking it seriously. I just wanted to question iwaju since they are an active raider, they know more about the type of person people are accusing babyjak posters of beingI Read It And It's The Same Point Over And Over Again. Just Because Froot And Doll Interpreted Babyjak As A Caca Doesn't Make It Definite. Doll Considered 'Lita Non-Offensive For A While. Would You Consider That Opinion Now?Show quoted text
Dude i am not reading any of this i don't fucking care about this shit
Paranoid
Quis furor, ô nuswa!
Paranoid
Quis furor, ô nuswa!
5 days ago#658978
Guys I’m not fucking dumb ok stop reacting to me with this emojiDude i am not reading any of this i don't fucking care about this shitShow quoted text
you know what we mean retard LOL
This is like calling criminals "human fucking beings" libtard logic. Or "u just hate black people because of their SKIN and nothing else".
Because before the gif of the spade caca twerking, the context of babyjak was he was a child. Everyone knew this, unless you want to twist history and context.
This is like saying "why are people calling soyjaks soyboys? It's just a man with a stubble". No everyone knows it's supposed to depict something, especially in the context of SOYJAK PARTY it's supposed to be a fucking soyboy.
This is also what makes languages distinct from each other. The word "Nigga" means a black person in English while in China "Ni Ge" means something else. And
Nabbv will even argue that this isn't true because "if you show it to someone else on normienet they will say X", first of all that's not true and even if it was it doesn't matter because we all knew it's a child on soyjakl party
Caca is also a character, and a word to describe actual kids. Between 2022 and 2026 we would call all children "cacas", referring to the cacajaks. It's also a substitute for soylita and shoyta because it was sexualized so much.
If you said in 2024 "Holy shit I want to FUCK that caca" you would get banned, for being a paedophile. Same as saying you wanted to fuck cacajak. You fuckers just decided to hide the fact it's paedophilic by saying it suddenly means something else.
But now you take the opportunity to twist the meaning of cacajak and say it's not paedophilic, because you've realized people won't get banned for it. Just another reason why you fuckers stand on nothing. All these "Abdl" arguments are irrelevant because context exists.
If you drew caca, everyone knew it meant a kid, and since youve used the website for a long time, you know it. But you discovered you can just say "it's actually Abdl guys because they did that briefly in 2023".
You dont admit that of course, that would get you banned lol.
There is zero arguments.
Log in to reply to this thread.