SERIOUS: Why do (You) hate doll?
Please explain to me why you dislike doll, I was only there for the tail end of his last reign and he seemed like one of the cooler admins why do 'ru keks suddenly hate him out of nowhere I'm out of the loop I guess.
Coemskong
π
>imply that the moderation here allows pedophilia/is going to unban soylitaHe's not banned because I'm still not sure whether he's a pedophile, but regardless of whether he's a pedo or not, I know he's extremely childish and irresponsible to constantly concern troll and try to imply that the moderation here allows pedophilia/is going to unban soylita, or call IRC users pedophiles based off nothing, all while having these disastrous skeletons in his closet. He doesn't like when it's done to him but had no problem doing it to other people. I hope he learns from this.Show quoted text
geg is @HOTDOGHEAD_ADMIN not doll or am I just retarded, why is he still here then this is way worse than what @ScientoloJu got banned for, why is doll still here?
Evendoe there is a lot of soylita posts that mustard don't allow me to delete just bc they are 2023/2024 posts.
>call IRC users pedophiles based off nothing
Not pedophiles but IRC users are cancer
1
Soylita and Shoyta are banned. I don't let anyone upload them even if they're not being used in a pedophilic context. Mustard wants to archive old posts because they reflect the state of the sharty at the time, unfortunately, back then posts like that were extremely common and allowed so that was the state of the sharty. He doesn't want to try to whitewash our history by nuking hundreds of posts and I understand why.Evendoe there is a lot of soylita posts that mustard don't allow me to delete just bc they are 2023/2024 posts.
I agree, they can be pretty cancerous spamming porn and being annoying, but it's still important not to throw the word "pedophile" around at everyone you hate because that dilutes its meaning and slowly normalizes it. It's also bad to try to label people as pedophiles without undeniable evidence.Not pedophiles but IRC users are cancer
9
1
11
1
Can we label people with slightly less horrible labels like zoophile (not saying that raping animals isn't bad, pedophelia is just far worse socially speaking since apparently "white women and dogs" is near normal tier safe sleazy humor shit)Soylita and Shoyta are banned. I don't let anyone upload them even if they're not being used in a pedophilic context. Mustard wants to archive old posts because they reflect the state of the sharty at the time, unfortunately, back then posts like that were extremely common and allowed so that was the state of the sharty. He doesn't want to try to whitewash our history by nuking hundreds of posts and I understand why.Show quoted text
Evendoe there is a lot of soylita posts that mustard don't allow me to delete just bc they are 2023/2024 posts.I agree, they can be pretty cancerous spamming porn and being annoying, but it's still important not to throw the word "pedophile" around at everyone you hate because that dilutes its meaning and slowly normalizes it. It's also bad to try to label people as pedophiles without undeniable evidence.Show quoted text
Not pedophiles but IRC users are cancer
TSMT porn spam is annoying but labeling drawings of adults as 'p waters down its definition as wellSoylita and Shoyta are banned. I don't let anyone upload them even if they're not being used in a pedophilic context. Mustard wants to archive old posts because they reflect the state of the sharty at the time, unfortunately, back then posts like that were extremely common and allowed so that was the state of the sharty. He doesn't want to try to whitewash our history by nuking hundreds of posts and I understand why.Show quoted text
Evendoe there is a lot of soylita posts that mustard don't allow me to delete just bc they are 2023/2024 posts.I agree, they can be pretty cancerous spamming porn and being annoying, but it's still important not to throw the word "pedophile" around at everyone you hate because that dilutes its meaning and slowly normalizes it. It's also bad to try to label people as pedophiles without undeniable evidence.Show quoted text
Not pedophiles but IRC users are cancer
The overreactions to the posts are the main reason why it gets posted in the first place
3
I donβt personally believe that there is another person named red that he knew about unless he provides evidence for these claims
WHY DOES EVERYONE IN A MODERATION POSITION ON THE INTERNET WANT TO RAPE CHILDREN HOW DO YOU FIND THESE PEOPLE CONSISTENTLY
Granite
JSID, also quote is an actual depressed pedophile faggot who wants to end it all if that matters
Why the fuck soysphere attracts alot of fucking pedophiles ffs
1
Granite
JSID, also quote is an actual depressed pedophile faggot who wants to end it all if that matters
alson2
THE monochromejak
>slightly less horrible labels like zoophile
MenstrualCykill
Freedom
I donβt
1#IT2SIDA
alson2
THE monochromejak
If thub got raped just for putting lolinigger dogwhistles on his shitty troony drawings then this fucking zoophile nigger should already be banned.
literally the same situation.
literally the same situation.
1HOTDOGHEAD_ADMIN
soyjak.forum admin
RedYankee and Anglo_Wine/"Red" are two different people. The screenshot cut the first part of the conversation.is there something im not getting about the "red situation". Is it that Red was a janny when DOLL knew they were 12?Show quoted text
You might want to rephrase what you said
https://megalodon.jp/2026-0407-0624-50/https://soyjak.st:443/soy/thread/15768660.html
8HOTDOGHEAD_ADMIN
soyjak.forum admin
Both of the people mentioned are not underage and were not underage when the conversation occurred.
https://soyjak.forum/threads/soyjak-wiki-soyjakwiki-org.89/page-42
Kuz and kaguya both discuss lowering the age of the woman to get "kompromat" on me, which is shown in the screenshot posted. They go from saying she is 17, to 15, to 14, so she would have 4 years until she "expires". Its just nasty pedoshit that I called out 3 years ago.
11women ripen (peak women) at 35 idk what the fuck kuz is on about
3
1Log in to reply to this thread.