Ohnonono IRCmutts...

So I came to the IRC only to be leaked at by Aout, which opened the topic about him posting a sexual depiction of Smuglet.
He agreed it was a loli once again but then him, @soycheckmark and @isaac33 tried to say
>SAAR YOU LEFT IT UP AND IT'S INHERENTLY FAGPHILIC
Soylita is explicitly modeled after the concept of a "Lolita." The term "Lolita" comes from Lolita, whose central subject is an adult man's sexual obsession with a 12-year-old girl. The term "Lolita" has become widely associated with the sexualization of underage girls.
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girls
Moreover he didn't contact me about any of this and just went out and posted Smuglet porn btw.
Come die on this topic.