Ohnonono IRCmutts...
So I came to the IRC only to be leaked at by Aout, which opened the topic about him posting a sexual depiction of Smuglet.
He agreed it was a loli once again but then him, @soycheckmark and @isaac33 tried to say
>SAAR YOU LEFT IT UP AND IT'S INHERENTLY FAGPHILIC
Soylita is explicitly modeled after the concept of a "Lolita." The term "Lolita" comes from Lolita, whose central subject is an adult man's sexual obsession with a 12-year-old girl. The term "Lolita" has become widely associated with the sexualization of underage girls.
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girls
Moreover he didn't contact me about any of this and just went out and posted Smuglet porn btw.
Come die on this topic.
He agreed it was a loli once again but then him, @soycheckmark and @isaac33 tried to say
>SAAR YOU LEFT IT UP AND IT'S INHERENTLY FAGPHILIC
Soylita is explicitly modeled after the concept of a "Lolita." The term "Lolita" comes from Lolita, whose central subject is an adult man's sexual obsession with a 12-year-old girl. The term "Lolita" has become widely associated with the sexualization of underage girls.
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girls
Moreover he didn't contact me about any of this and just went out and posted Smuglet porn btw.
Come die on this topic.
45
7
3
2
2
2
1
5find someone who cares
Snophono
Terminal SNCA
Bump
Smuglet being traced from a Blue Archive asset doesn't make every use of Smuglet a sexual image. By that logic, every screenshot from a controversial work would permanently inherit every theme of its source. That's not how people interpret memes. You'd have to prove that the specific Smuglet image itself is intended to sexually arouse or depict a sexualized character who's underage or underage looking. That's a non sequitur. These don't necessarily retain the original sexual context. If someone crops a character's face out of a swimsuit illustration, the crop itself isn't a swimsuit image because that property is taken away. I'll grant that Blue Archive is Diddyphilic, but it doesn't establish the image itself kek. If thousands of people used Smuglet for years without even knowing where it came from, that suggests the image functions independently as a reaction image. Learning the source doesn't change what the image communicates.INCOMPREHENSIBLE FILIPINVKE BELOW
Smuglet wasn't just "claimed" to originate from the Blue Archive community, it did. The exact origin (according to this random preddit thread https://www.reddit.com/r/BlueArchive/comments/wolljn/comment/ikco84t/) is from Tokyu Marui's VR Market collaboration with Blue Archive. There are two galleries, and presumably the (now deleted) second gallery had the actual image Smuglet was traced off of. Do note that in the first gallery there are pantyshots of the very same (presumably underage...) characters. Even without this inherently fagphilic origin, the fact that the image was traced from any character from Blue Archive (the gacha game that panders to lolicons while also nurturing a community of the said lolicons) already makes it bad enough, never mind that the character is one of the lolis that Blue Archive uses to pander to fags with.
>Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic.
1. Not knowing that Smuglet was from Blue Archive doesn't make it any less bad that it is being posted on here. Even if the origins were from clueless people tracing MACARONI's pfp, the variant gains a new context when it was discovered that it was infact from an inherently fagphilic source.
2. The argument where you compare Smuglet to posting an image of Kid Goku isn't exactly the same, because the game Blue Archive panders to fags through it's characters, thus making it's characters fagphilic in nature, and making posting them much worse than posting an image of Kid Goku, who's character is NOT meant to pander to fags.
My final argument here is that this entire situation wouldn't be happening if the simplest answer was taken, to ban Smuglet entirely from the site. It's only used by people who intend to bait others through it's ugliness and getting them to call the variant fagphilic, and therefore doesnt serve a role in the site important enough to justify it's roots.
So yeah this isn't really a good argument, again this doesn't address Aout basically making loli porn and without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from that guy's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girls. Gonna say that again because all of this was just a shadow box.
I do agree it should be banned though.
Aout is a disturbing criminal.
GapeNewell
Poop and niggers dying
poop and niggers dying
Says the kiwifail!Aout is a disturbing criminal.
>Wait an hour for Warrior-Z's response
>It's SNCA brim
>It's SNCA brim
Metro2033
To Be Over
get aout of town!
Snophono
Terminal SNCA
Aout, is, also, a valid transexual queen.
REMINDER: AOUT MADE PORN OF SMUGLET, A LOLI. HE IS TRYING TO FLIP THIS BUT CANT KEK.
Yea yea yea, keep ignoring me, kiwifail!
luggage
Log in to reply to this thread.