Tourist63
I'm probably the one Tranny reacting you.
1 month ago#1304210
Obvoiously the ms paint style and the beard and glasses on variants should be on one but many of the variants you see posted are considered dust. Even objectively speaking If all jaks had to be made with these basic rules alone there shouldn't be swinmycucks and oldfags whining about them
i think a black & white wojak style is must for a soyjak
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
wojak style is included in the soyjak characteristics
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
wojak style is included in the soyjak characteristics
1 month ago#1304406
Most of the classic gems aren't 1:1 traces. (talked about here https://soyjakwiki.org/Tracejak)i think a black & white wojak style is must for a soyjak
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
<nigger
Useful guidelines from the 'ki article on 'jakking in picture related
1 month ago#1304454
it depends on what you call tracing tbh. I don't think a single prominent soyjak has been made without a templateMost of the classic gems aren't 1:1 traces. (talked about here https://soyjakwiki.org/Tracejak)Show quoted text
i think a black & white wojak style is must for a soyjak
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
<nigger
Useful guidelines from the 'ki article on 'jakking in picture related
SwagdChristBeliever
SwagdChristBeliever
1 month ago#1304494
Also when you make a new 'jak, your jakking it.
Log in to reply to this thread.