What exactly makes a 'Soyjak?'
Obvoiously the ms paint style and the beard and glasses on variants should be on one but many of the variants you see posted are considered dust. Even objectively speaking If all jaks had to be made with these basic rules alone there shouldn't be swinmycucks and oldflamboyant people whining about them
Are they really just traced images with add-ons? Or should they follow a specific i don't know like facial pattern to meet a soyjak criteria?
i think a black & white wojak style is must for a soyjak
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
wojak style is included in the soyjak characteristics
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
wojak style is included in the soyjak characteristics
Most of the classic gems aren't 1:1 traces. (talked about here https://soyjakwiki.org/Tracejak)i think a black & white wojak style is must for a soyjak
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
<noon
Useful guidelines from the 'ki article on 'jakking in picture related
it depends on what you call tracing tbh. I don't think a single prominent soyjak has been made without a templateMost of the classic gems aren't 1:1 traces. (talked about here https://soyjakwiki.org/Tracejak)Show quoted text
i think a black & white wojak style is must for a soyjak
furthermore, it should have atleast 3 of these soyjak characteristics:
- glasses
- bald
- stubble
- gaping mouth
- traced of a soyboy ( or making fun of soybos )
<noon
Useful guidelines from the 'ki article on 'jakking in picture related
Also when you make a new 'jak, your jakking it.
see you next year
Log in to reply to this thread.

