shad
✹
4 hours ago#1163858
Subject: If the site is against it now, why does the legacy content remain? Me and my beloved kvrdbro @CIYAGER88 have been discussing this offsite and were both mad at the fact this shit isnt deleted.
I’m making this thread because I think it’s time we have a serious conversation about the site's history and its current standards.
As many of the newer users likely don’t know, there was a time prior to early 2024 when the 'ru allowed soylita. That changed when the rules were updated, and today, posting that kind of material results in a permaban.
This brings up a significant inconsistency. If the administration and the community have taken a firm stance against this content to the point of permabanning users who post it now, why does the legacy content from before the rule change still exist in the archives?
If this site truly cares about moving away from that past and enforcing a strict standard against such material, leaving the old content up feels like a major oversight. It contradicts the current rules and the message the site claims to stand for. Why hasn't there been a full purge of this content?
If we are supposedly a community that has moved past that pedotroon shit, we shouldn't be hosting the history of it either. I’d like to hear what others think should this legacy content be purged to align with our current rules. Tired of hearing this archival bullshit, it's literally 'lita. here is an example i found:
if you agree with removing this shit and react with 
if your a pedonigger and want it to stay. and here are some screenshots of 2 admins and a mod refusing to remove this shit as proof: CIYAGER88
operâsyona TAD
Read thisYeah but it doesn't look pedophilic to meShow quoted text
pedoniggertroon fictional depictions of prepubescent or young-looking female characters? isnt this already a known thing
https://soyjakwiki.org/Soylita
shad
✹
3 hours ago#1164143
don't think its bannable since its a 'ki pageBruh how do i remove the embedShow quoted text
BootsandChainsaws
Racial retard on the loose
3 hours ago#1164148
shad
✹
3 hours ago#1164160
considering the variant's reputation they still should be. its bannable for posting the non-pedophilic ones too btwShow quoted text
Nuswapilled....Show quoted text
Yeah but it doesn't look pedophilic to meWait I reread the wiki I get it more now but the really old non-pedophilic ones shouldn't be deleted or somethingShow quoted text
do you know about variant's reputation?Show quoted text
Yeah but it doesn't look pedophilic to me
CIYAGER88
operâsyona TAD
3 hours ago#1164191
Leak the ip of the nigger who reactedLook , it's inherently pedophilic ; the nigger who made this brimstone probably sexualizes Kurdish children . That's why it must be taken downShow quoted text
Wait I reread the wiki I get it more now but the really old non-pedophilic ones shouldn't be deleted or something
shad
✹
BootsandChainsaws
Racial retard on the loose
3 hours ago#1164243
shad
✹
3 hours ago#1164249
i dont know nigga The op was probably some turkniggerWhy Kurdish specificallyShow quoted text
Look , it's inherently pedophilic ; the nigger who made this brimstone probably sexualizes Kurdish children . That's why it must be taken downShow quoted text
Wait I reread the wiki I get it more now but the really old non-pedophilic ones shouldn't be deleted or something
BootsandChainsaws
Racial retard on the loose
Log in to reply to this thread.