how can i stop producing low tier iron and get good at making soyboy wojacks

66 replies·588 views
User avatar
Jones

No Enemies

2 days ago#1149056
title :neutral:
/ 4
2 days ago#1149546
Pineapple
Post #200842Post #201992Post #201376Post #186023Post #241277
Nuvariants are the way
^
User avatar
ScientoloJu

YO YO YO YO YO YO YO YO YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, WUDDDDUPPPPPP!

2 days ago#1149554
Jones
ScientoloJu
Show quoted text
come on bro you really dont get the reference
no
go look it up and get yo White ahh cultured
2 days ago#1149556
ScientoloJu
you should start a meme called jones bbq and foot massage
:unc:
User avatar
Jones

No Enemies

2 days ago#1149584
ScientoloJu
Jones
Show quoted text
no
go look it up and get yo White ahh cultured
GAY
User avatar
Govnoje

Goytivities

2 days ago#1149589
Read the Talmud
User avatar
muscular_engineer

Inventor of the Mineral Inspecteur Soyjak

2 days ago#1153949
Jones
muscular_engineer
Show quoted text
Jones
Show quoted text
title :neutral:
Looking at your posts most of them are just unfinished. Not only in the sense of not even being fully colored in, missing backgrounds when not a template, and so forth, but they just don't have creative elements.
Making a good 'jak isn't about the topic. You can make a funny 'jak about literally anything. The part that matters is that you add funny details to it. These can either be creative and relevant or you can use the shotgun method (as in slopjaks) by simply adding on random shit and hoping that something sticks.
Let's look at one of your jaks:
Post #242618
It's olgol and he's horny for a black dildo. None of that is actually specific to olgol other than the olgolstein variant which you pasted in. It's bare, unfinished.
Olgol is bosnian, which is a country with a high muslim population. What if you drew the dildo as part of a goat-shaped sex doll?
Olgol hates the "Shroom". Why not shape the tip of the dildo's dick like the mushroom in the "shroom" variant?
Olgol also hates "Fashies". Why not put four dildos toghether in the shape of a swastika that hes looking at?
All those ideas are still unfinished. But you can see the technique, which is you need to continue adding features and relevant absurdity, exaggeration with a grain of truth, etc., until you have produced an absurd, comical, or grotesque image of which the subject could in some manner be considered to look like this and say this.
Hope this helps
Post #242957
i dont want to make slopjaks or fully get into namefag shitflinging. that post was something funny i made in 2 minutes.
also the bare version can be a bit funnier since its just him and a bbc.
Not what I said, the reason your 'jaks aren't funny is because they have no substance. They are uncreative and overly simple. Constructive criticism, take it or leave it
/ 4
Log in to reply to this thread.