1 hour ago#876789
THEY HIDE MICROPHONES IN THE ICECREAM SO WHEN THE KIDS EAT IT THEY CAN TRACK THE ACID SOUNDS AND REPLICATE IT TO MAKE HUMAN CLONES+THIS IS WHY KIDS FEEL SO FULL AFTER EATING ICECREAM NOT BECAUSE OF THE ICECREAM BUT BECAUSE OF THE MICROPHONE. THEY ALSO HAVE HIDDEN CAMERAS ON THE ICECREAM TRUCK THAT SHOOTS BULLETS.
kendohighway
never goon never edge
1 hour ago#876802
27caca46
Not that brown
1 hour ago#876810
Hey dude what do you think about THE THEORY OF ARROWS
This is basic knowledge. However, I still felt it necessary to transcribe them, insofar as we need steady rules that we can refer to in times of disagreement. If you are casually reading, you can skip this part, although I still recommend taking a look before starting to duel.
By posting >[statement] and attaching an soyboy image you are claiming him (the person of the statement) to be a soyboy. When this is posted whoever stated that statement is objectively an soyboy.
(Law of Rage)
To counter this, you must post >>[statement]. This implies that the person that implies that the statement is soy is a soyboy and the statement he implies is soy is not soy.
To counter this too, you must add another arrow, which makes it >>>[statement]. This reverts it back to >[statement]. Similarly, adding yet another arrow, which would make it >>>>[statement], reverts it back to >>[statement].
As you can imagine, >>>>>[statement] reverts to >[statement], and so on until the post reaches letter limit. (more on letter limit in Part 2)
Not using any arrows makes it your own statement. As you can see, arrowX[odd number] is negative (-) to the original (non- arrowed) statement, while arrowX[even number] is positive (+) to the original statement. (order 1) This is assuming the attached pic is a soyboy pic. But if it is a GigaChad pic it makes arrowX[odd number] + and arrowX[even number] -, (order 2) as should be obvious. In the case of an attached pic of neither onions nor GigaChad it should be clear if it is order 1 or order 2, or if it is order 3 which is neutral or order 4 which is randumb
A.K.A. could be 1, 2 or 3.
The "original" statement might have been posted before or made up on the spot by using 1 or more arrows.
[edit edit source]
Now for the Techniques.
A FEW BASIC TECHNIQUES
I will not share all my techniques, certainly not the most advanced ones, in this manifesto. They will be gradually revelaed in exciting duels. Of course, as these techniques are unveiled, I will soon have to continue innovating.
On the Letter Limit: As after reaching the letter limit more arrows cannot be added, a duel between 2 players of great dedication (autism) will eventually reach the limit, thus
everything depends on the post to reach the limit. The first to post can, then, manipulate the result of the duel by choosing the right amount of letters. On Anticipation: As an example, Player1 can post >>>>>[statement] right after posting >>> [statement], befor >>>>[statement] is posted by Player2. In this situation Player2 has been outplayed, as his >>>>[statement] has already been claimed as soy, and he is merely fitting in the stereotype. (if he himself does not outplay Player1, of course).
On Contradiction: For example, Player1 posts >>>[statement] with onionsboy image and Player2 posts >>>[statement] with GigaChad image, then it is a situation of Neutrality and both players are losers. There are many, many more techniques, including ones that nullify the above ones, but I will not share
them right now & here.
t introduce in this short introduction to the basics, the
I dare
immense subject of the soyposting aesthetic, which largely
transcends the rules.
ON THE EXCITEMENT OF THE DUEL
edit source]
[...] Good duelling!
Snopes
[edit
1. ↑ https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/3214660#3215259
>There are many, many more techniques, including ones that nullify the above ones, but I will not share them right now & here.
This is basic knowledge. However, I still felt it necessary to transcribe them, insofar as we need steady rules that we can refer to in times of disagreement. If you are casually reading, you can skip this part, although I still recommend taking a look before starting to duel.
By posting >[statement] and attaching an soyboy image you are claiming him (the person of the statement) to be a soyboy. When this is posted whoever stated that statement is objectively an soyboy.
(Law of Rage)
To counter this, you must post >>[statement]. This implies that the person that implies that the statement is soy is a soyboy and the statement he implies is soy is not soy.
To counter this too, you must add another arrow, which makes it >>>[statement]. This reverts it back to >[statement]. Similarly, adding yet another arrow, which would make it >>>>[statement], reverts it back to >>[statement].
As you can imagine, >>>>>[statement] reverts to >[statement], and so on until the post reaches letter limit. (more on letter limit in Part 2)
Not using any arrows makes it your own statement. As you can see, arrowX[odd number] is negative (-) to the original (non- arrowed) statement, while arrowX[even number] is positive (+) to the original statement. (order 1) This is assuming the attached pic is a soyboy pic. But if it is a GigaChad pic it makes arrowX[odd number] + and arrowX[even number] -, (order 2) as should be obvious. In the case of an attached pic of neither onions nor GigaChad it should be clear if it is order 1 or order 2, or if it is order 3 which is neutral or order 4 which is randumb
A.K.A. could be 1, 2 or 3.
The "original" statement might have been posted before or made up on the spot by using 1 or more arrows.
[edit edit source]
Now for the Techniques.
A FEW BASIC TECHNIQUES
I will not share all my techniques, certainly not the most advanced ones, in this manifesto. They will be gradually revelaed in exciting duels. Of course, as these techniques are unveiled, I will soon have to continue innovating.
On the Letter Limit: As after reaching the letter limit more arrows cannot be added, a duel between 2 players of great dedication (autism) will eventually reach the limit, thus
everything depends on the post to reach the limit. The first to post can, then, manipulate the result of the duel by choosing the right amount of letters. On Anticipation: As an example, Player1 can post >>>>>[statement] right after posting >>> [statement], befor >>>>[statement] is posted by Player2. In this situation Player2 has been outplayed, as his >>>>[statement] has already been claimed as soy, and he is merely fitting in the stereotype. (if he himself does not outplay Player1, of course).
On Contradiction: For example, Player1 posts >>>[statement] with onionsboy image and Player2 posts >>>[statement] with GigaChad image, then it is a situation of Neutrality and both players are losers. There are many, many more techniques, including ones that nullify the above ones, but I will not share
them right now & here.
t introduce in this short introduction to the basics, the
I dare
immense subject of the soyposting aesthetic, which largely
transcends the rules.
ON THE EXCITEMENT OF THE DUEL
edit source]
[...] Good duelling!
Snopes
[edit
1. ↑ https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/3214660#3215259
>There are many, many more techniques, including ones that nullify the above ones, but I will not share them right now & here.
1 hour ago#876825
Mmm, ice cream. 
Log in to reply to this thread.